Jeff Victor wrote:
Just curious: which process(es) gets "billed" for shared text pages?
Jeff,
We keep track of shared cow segments so they are not double counted.
Off the top of my head I think we just credit that to the first process
we see using the segment, however I'll let Steve chime in h
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Mike,
Mike Gerdts wrote:
In the proposal you say:
As part of this overall project, we will be enhancing the internal
rcapd rss accounting so that rcapd will have a more accurate
measurement of the overall rss for each zone.
Does this spill over to prstat such
Mike,
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On 6/26/06, Gerald A. Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Attached is a description of a project we have been refining for
a while now. The idea is to improve the integration of zones
with some of the existing resource management features in Solaris.
In the proposal y
On 6/26/06, Gerald A. Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Attached is a description of a project we have been refining for
a while now. The idea is to improve the integration of zones
with some of the existing resource management features in Solaris.
In the proposal you say:
As part of
Could we somehow work the zone name into this? It would be nice for
e.g. poolstat(1) observability. Otherwise the user experience is going
to be all about trying to work out what 'SUNWzone34' maps to, which
seems poor.
We need to have the name begin with SUNW or we could have collisions with
e
Dan,
Thanks for your detailed comments. My responses are in-line.
Dan Price wrote:
Very belatedly, I'm just getting around to reviewing this. Overall
I think it looks good. Comments in-line.
1) "Hard" vs. "Soft" RM configuration within zonecfg
...
dedicated-cpu
Very belatedly, I'm just getting around to reviewing this. Overall
I think it looks good. Comments in-line.
> 1) "Hard" vs. "Soft" RM configuration within zonecfg
>
...
> dedicated-cpu
> ncpus (a positive integer or range, default value 1)
>
Amol,
Thanks for your comments. I have some responses in-line.
Amol A Chiplunkar wrote:
These are very exciting features !!
Some comments.
If a dedicated-cpu (or eventually a dedicated-memory) resource is
configured for the zone, then when the zone boots zoneadmd will create
a temporary poo
Mike,
I think most of your comments were addressed in my response to
Jeff but I did want to make sure one thing was clear.
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On 6/27/06, Jeff Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4) Aliases: The notion of aliases also creates redundant output which
could be
confusing. I like the
Jeff,
Thanks for your comments. I have a few responses in-line.
Jeff Victor wrote:
1) General comment: I agree that this will provide needed clarity to the
seemingly unorganized RM features that we have scattered through Solaris
during the last decade. The automation of certain activities (e.
These are very exciting features !!
Some comments.
If a dedicated-cpu (or eventually a dedicated-memory) resource is
configured for the zone, then when the zone boots zoneadmd will create
a temporary pool dedicated for the zones use.
The temp pool created is going to show up in pooladm outp
On 6/27/06, Jeff Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) General comment: I agree that this will provide needed clarity to the
seemingly
unorganized RM features that we have scattered through Solaris during the last
decade. The automation of certain activities (e.g. starting rcapd in the GZ when
ne
1) General comment: I agree that this will provide needed clarity to the seemingly
unorganized RM features that we have scattered through Solaris during the last
decade. The automation of certain activities (e.g. starting rcapd in the GZ when
needed) will also be extremely beneficial.
2) Termi
13 matches
Mail list logo
