Could we somehow work the zone name into this?  It would be nice for
e.g. poolstat(1) observability.  Otherwise the user experience is going
to be all about trying to work out what 'SUNWzone34' maps to, which
seems poor.

We need to have the name begin with SUNW or we could have collisions with
existing pools.  I supposed instead of zone{id}, it could be SUNW{zonename}
although you lose the visibility that the pool is associated with a zone.
Maybe SUNWzone_{zonename}?

Or perhaps SUNWtemp_{zonename}?

zones-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to