Log message for revision 40805:
- Collector #1976: FTP STOR command would load the file being
uploaded in memory. Changed to use a TemporaryFile.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/doc/CHANGES.txt
U
Log message for revision 40806:
- Collector #1976: FTP STOR command would load the file being
uploaded in memory. Changed to use a TemporaryFile.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.9/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/branches/2.9/lib/python/ZServer/FTPRequest.py
U
Log message for revision 40807:
- Collector #1976: FTP STOR command would load the file being
uploaded in memory. Changed to use a TemporaryFile.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/ZServer/FTPRequest.py
U
Log message for revision 40809:
encoding input field is now a hidden field since we enforce UTF-8
Changed:
U
Zope/branches/ajung-zpt-integration/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/pt/ptEdit.pt
-=-
Modified:
Log message for revision 40812:
removed debug output
Changed:
U
Zope/branches/ajung-zpt-integration/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/ZopePageTemplate.py
-=-
Modified:
Zope/branches/ajung-zpt-integration/lib/python/Products/PageTemplates/ZopePageTemplate.py
Log message for revision 40813:
New zdaemon.
This fixes an intermittent test-killing race in
testRunIgnoresParentSignals, which was introduced
the last time a new zdaemon got stitched in.
Changed:
_U Zope/trunk/lib/python/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/trunk/lib/python
Log message for revision 40819:
Made sure logging is configured. Read $INSTANCE_HOME/log.ini if it exists.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/ZopeLite.py
U
Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/doc/CHANGES.txt
U
Log message for revision 40821:
Merged Zope-2_8-branch -r40818:40819 into the trunk.
(Made sure logging is configured. Read $INSTANCE_HOME/log.ini if it exists.)
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/ZopeLite.py
U
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Dec 15 12:01:02 2005 UTC to Fri Dec 16 12:01:02 2005 UTC.
There were no messages.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux
zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2253
Blamelist: andreasjung,jim,jinty,jmo,sidnei
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2254
Blamelist: andreasjung,ctheune,jim,jinty,jmo,sidnei,tim_one,tseaver,yuppie
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2254
Blamelist: andreasjung,ctheune,jim,jinty,jmo,sidnei,tim_one,tseaver,yuppie
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2253
Blamelist: andreasjung,jim,jinty,jmo,sidnei
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2260
Blamelist: andreasjung,hdima,mgedmin,tim_one
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
I've seen the following tests fail today, after updating Zope 2.8
branch for all variants of BTrees:
==
ERROR: testUpdateFromPersistentMapping
(BTrees.tests.testBTrees.IIBucketTest)
[Sidnei da Silva]
I've seen the following tests fail today, after updating Zope 2.8 branch
for all variants of BTrees:
==
ERROR: testUpdateFromPersistentMapping
(BTrees.tests.testBTrees.IIBucketTest)
[Sidnei]
I've seen the following tests fail today, after updating Zope 2.8 branch
...
Python 2.4.2 (#2, Nov 20 2005, 17:20:59)
...
BTW, I think the Official Story is that Python 2.4+ is still not supported
for Zope 2.8. I ran all the stuff in my reply with 2.4.2 too. Doesn't
matter, though
| No idea why it failed for you. The only thing that rings a bell here is
| that this test was added in ZODB 3.4.2b1, corresponding to this ZODB news
| entry:
|
|
| BTrees
| --
|
| - (3.4.2b1) Collector 1873. It wasn't possible to construct a BTree
| or Bucket from, or apply their
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:01:59PM -0200, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| But, why only the 2.8 tests would fail then? I'll try a 'make clean'
| before running the tests and see if it helps.
That did indeed help, sorry for the noise.
--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems, LLC.
http://enfoldsystems.com
[Sidnei da Silva]
But, why only the 2.8 tests would fail then?
Hey, it's your machine, you figure it out ;-) Note that test.py in 2.8 has
little in common with the test.py in 2.9 or Zope trunk, and they may very
well react in different ways to quirks in your environment.
I'll try a 'make
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2268
Blamelist: hdima,mgedmin,shh,yuppie
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
[Andreas Jung, on zope-dev; Tim added zodb-dev to this msg]
I would like to consider the 2.7 branch closed for any kind of fixes except
security related fixes. I don't plan any further 2.7 releases.
In that case (which is fine by me), I'll stop porting fixes to the
ZODB 3.2 line too. No
- Original Message -
From: Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kees de Brabander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope@zope.org
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] user account defined outside context of object being
accessed
Kees de Brabander wrote at 2005-12-13 22:40
[At 15.12.2005 20:31, Tino Wildenhain kindly sent the following quotation.]
You need python2.3.5 or higher and also -dev libs of it. If you run
stable your python might be too far back
Some day maybe, but AFAIK not yet: Debian Sarge (stable release) has
Python 2.3.5 (default, dependency
adeline nombre wrote:
bonjour
je suis un débutant. je veux installer zope sur la debian. mais j'ai
remarqué un repertoire /usr/lib/zope. j'ai donc conclu que zope a été
installé avec mon system debian. maintenant comment faire pour démarer
zope. dois-je faire un start et où?
merci
Hi.
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 20:31 +0100, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Even on debian its recommended to install zope from source.
Debian/Ubuntu zope packages have interesting zope instances handlers.
It would be nice you try them out and see it is worth to use in some
case.
--
A powerfull GroupWare, CMS,
Thanks; this is a problem we are well aware of. Our solution is to
increase the amount of workers, obviously.
However, I'm increasingly getting a feeling that for a rather big
range of unlikely situations that are nonetheless to be expected, Zope
doesn't work _at all_. In a WebServices setting,
Jan-Ole Esleben wrote:
Thanks; this is a problem we are well aware of. Our solution is to
increase the amount of workers, obviously.
However, I'm increasingly getting a feeling that for a rather big
range of unlikely situations that are nonetheless to be expected, Zope
doesn't work _at all_.
Thanks, I will definitely look into that for my immediate problems.
Ole
2005/12/16, Michael Haubenwallner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jan-Ole Esleben wrote:
Thanks; this is a problem we are well aware of. Our solution is to
increase the amount of workers, obviously.
However, I'm increasingly
Hi all,
I am trying to use tal and metal inside of a PloneArticle instance and
can not get it to work.
Should this not be possible?
I am aware that kupu needs to be switched to not strip customg tags on
edit and that there are settings which enable or disble content types in
the article
I don't understand the problem. How is using XML-RPC incompatible
with persistence? What are you trying to exclude?
- C
On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:40 AM, Jan-Ole Esleben wrote:
Thanks; this is a problem we are well aware of. Our solution is to
increase the amount of workers, obviously.
Stefan Kueppers wrote:
I am trying to use tal and metal inside of a PloneArticle instance and
can not get it to work.
Should this not be possible?
Content is generally static, as part of the whole
content/logic/presentation concept. I don't know about PloneArticle, but
I doubt it's any
On 12/15/05, Nicolas Georgakopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all , I'm trying to display on the same page a table with (3
columns) with content from a list . I'm trying to batch the results so
that every 3 elements anothe row is created.
Can anyone give me a clue how to do that ?
Use
I don't understand the problem. How is using XML-RPC incompatible
with persistence? What are you trying to exclude?
I'm sorry, but I don't understand _that_ question. What am I trying to
_exclude_?
XML-RPC and (the concept of) persistence aren't incompatible. XML-RPC
(on a ZOPE server) and
On Dec 16, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Jan-Ole Esleben wrote:
I don't understand the problem. How is using XML-RPC incompatible
with persistence? What are you trying to exclude?
I'm sorry, but I don't understand _that_ question. What am I trying to
_exclude_?
You said:
it would most certainly be
I'm trying to host two site on one zope serverI have two fix IP and I have two network card installed. I changed my zope.conf to include two http server that listen on two different ports. But, I placed my site under different folder and I don't know how to redirect different IP to
Am Freitag, den 16.12.2005, 17:28 -0800 schrieb Allen Huang:
I'm trying to host two site on one zope server
I have two fix IP and I have two network card installed.
I changed my zope.conf to include two http server that listen on two
different ports.
But, I placed my site under different
I don't understand the problem. How is using XML-RPC incompatible
with persistence? What are you trying to exclude?
I'm sorry, but I don't understand _that_ question. What am I trying to
_exclude_?
You said:
it would most certainly be extremely hard to foresee the exact
setup of such
The problem setup is this; I explained it above, but it this has
become a long thread:
I write a ZOPE product. I want to make use of other software on the
internet and the services that software provides. So I use the methods
exposed by that software via SOAP, XML-RPC, whatever.
One of those
It's not about the threads or processes being tied up and waiting,
it's about the transaction breaking: because the internal call (the
one from the second server back to the first) changes the object on
the first server, and thus when the first server checks wether the
object has changed after the
40 matches
Mail list logo
