Re: [Zope] running Zope/Plone on a Windows Virtual Machine?

2007-11-07 Thread michael nt milne
yes I realise about the single point of failure. Ideally of course we'd have separate physical servers for this. It's an intranet so security is less of an issue. There just seem to be advantages from running virtual machines. I'm not an expert but aren't they easier to manage, rollback and

Re: [Zope] running Zope/Plone on a Windows Virtual Machine?

2007-11-07 Thread knitti
On 11/7/07, michael nt milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone tried this or had any experience with this? We're using Enfold Server and for staging and development purposes instead of using separate machines we're thinking of setting up a 'virtual machines' on the same server. There appear

Re: [Zope] running Zope/Plone on a Windows Virtual Machine?

2007-11-07 Thread knitti
On 11/7/07, michael nt milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes I realise about the single point of failure. Ideally of course we'd have separate physical servers for this. It's an intranet so security is less of an issue. There just seem to be advantages from running virtual machines. I'm not an

[Zope] running Zope/Plone on a Windows Virtual Machine?

2007-11-07 Thread michael nt milne
Has anyone tried this or had any experience with this? We're using Enfold Server and for staging and development purposes instead of using separate machines we're thinking of setting up a 'virtual machines' on the same server. There appear to be many benefits. However knowing that Zope/Plone are

Re: [Zope] running Zope/Plone on a Windows Virtual Machine?

2007-11-07 Thread michael nt milne
ok, so you could have two virtual machines say development and also staging which sat alongside a live production 'non virtual' instance of Zope. This would all sit on the one physical machine. The dev and staging instances would be switched off and on as required. With enough RAM and CPU would

Re: [Zope] running Zope/Plone on a Windows Virtual Machine?

2007-11-07 Thread knitti
On 11/7/07, michael nt milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, so you could have two virtual machines say development and also staging which sat alongside a live production 'non virtual' instance of Zope. This would all sit on the one physical machine. The dev and staging instances would be

[Zope] Running zope egg-packaged product tests

2007-01-11 Thread Sébastien Nicouleaud
Hello, I'm trying to run tests for an egg-packaged product, deployed in development mode (I'm using zope 2.10.1). I'm using the zopectl test command, with --path set to my product source directory. The problem is that the test runner seems to call the product initialize() function 2 times,

Re: [Zope] Running Zope

2000-12-03 Thread Phil Harris
book, which is available from the front page of Zope.org. hth Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Norm LaDuke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 1:17 AM Subject: [Zope] Running Zope | Can anyone out there tell me why an

Re: [Zope] Running Zope == ZopeVirgins

2000-12-03 Thread Jason Cunliffe
' and password for any further real-world use of Zope. This page should also include a form right there to do this. - Jason - Original Message - From: "Norm LaDuke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 1:17 AM Subject: [Zope] Running Zope |

Re: [Zope] Running Zope

2000-12-03 Thread Jason C. Leach
hi, So you think that because you can not get it going it's Zopes fault? Why not ask a specific question, based on what you say below I have no idea what you are doing or what your problem; this makes it difficult to write a response. Throw in a few details so we know what you are doing. I

[Zope] Running Zope

2000-12-02 Thread Norm LaDuke
Can anyone out there tell me why anyone would use a product whose tutorial won't even run. You guys are either INFINITELY more patient than I or you all have WAY too much time on your hands. I'm about 7 hours into this thing and we do finally have zope up and running but of course the tutorial

Re: [Zope] Running Zope

2000-12-02 Thread scott Burton
-- Original Message -- From: Norm LaDuke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 19:17:50 -0600 Can anyone out there tell me why anyone would use a product whose tutorial won't even run. You guys are either INFINITELY more patient than I or you all

Re: [Zope] Running Zope 2.2.1 as NT service

2000-08-28 Thread Wolfgang Strobl
On 27 Aug 2000, 12:50 Alexander Chelnokov wrote: The option seems to be unavailable under W2000. 2.1.6 could be run that way without any trouble. Could you please elaborate? I just installed 2.2.1 final on my developement machine, under win2000 prof us. The installer asked the usual

[Zope] Running Zope 2.2.1 as NT service

2000-08-27 Thread Alexander Chelnokov
Hello zope, The option seems to be unavailable under W2000. 2.1.6 could be run that way without any trouble. Best regards, Alexander N. Chelnokov Ural Scientific Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics str.Bankovsky, 7. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia ICQ: 25640913

[Zope] Running Zope 2.2 on Solaris 2.7

2000-07-19 Thread Andreas Rippel
I installed Zope 2.2 for Solaris 2.6 on Solaris 2.7. After starting an accessing as superuser I wanted to add an object e.g. a folder. I couldn't add any kind of object, while getting messages like Zope Error Zope has encountered an error while publishing this resource.

Re: [Zope] Running Zope 2.2 on Solaris 2.7

2000-07-19 Thread Christopher J. Kucera
Andreas Rippel wrote: I couldn't add any kind of object, while getting messages like ... Error Type: SuperCannotOwn Error Value: Objects cannot be owned by the superuser That's because in Zope 2.2.0, you can't create objects as the superuser. You'll have to create a

Re: [Zope] Running Zope 2.2 on Solaris 2.7

2000-07-19 Thread Diny van Gool
At 16:41 19-7-00 +0200, Andreas Rippel wrote: I installed Zope 2.2 for Solaris 2.6 on Solaris 2.7. After starting an accessing as superuser I wanted to add an object e.g. a folder. I couldn't add any kind of object, while getting messages like Hi, First you have to create another user and give