Hi all!
I create a ZPT with this result:
form name=Borrador method=post
action=http://yanged:8280/Papeles/Yanged/Links/Eliminar/;
div id=Borrable
input type=submit value=Eliminar name=Borrador /
/div
div class=Links id=Links1
div id=Movibleinput type=checkbox
Peter Bengtsson escribió:
Hi!
does this work on a folder?
Sure it does. Did you understand any of my code? I subclassed it on
the folder class.
The struct.xml function is on a folder object and I would like
struct.xml as an object contained by the folder one
This is
--On 6. Juli 2005 10:29:45 +0200 Garito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is why If I push Eliminar button don't submit the form to the
correct url (http://yanged:8280/Papeles/Yanged/Links/Eliminar)?
What happens instead? Look at your Z2.log to figure out what is requested.
-aj
Andreas Jung escribió:
--On 6. Juli 2005 10:29:45 +0200 Garito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is why If I push Eliminar button don't submit the form to
the
correct url (http://yanged:8280/Papeles/Yanged/Links/Eliminar)?
What happens instead? Look at your Z2.log to figure out
Garito wrote:
Andreas Jung escribió:
--On 6. Juli 2005 10:29:45 +0200 Garito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is why If I push Eliminar button don't submit the form to
the
correct url (http://yanged:8280/Papeles/Yanged/Links/Eliminar)?
What happens instead? Look at your Z2.log to
On 7/6/05, Garito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Bengtsson escribió:
Hi!
does this work on a folder?
Sure it does. Did you understand any of my code? I subclassed it on
the folder class.
The struct.xml function is on a folder object and I would like
struct.xml as an object
A wild guess: Your post works, but returns a redirect to a nother
page, which returns nothing. This will look exactly like notyhing
happened at the browser side.
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross
Lennart Regebro escribió:
A wild guess: Your post works, but returns a redirect to a nother
page, which returns nothing. This will look exactly like notyhing
happened at the browser side.
Yes, looking at Z2.log it seems it but If I execute the action url
manually it works like I expect
Garito wrote:
Lennart Regebro escribió:
A wild guess: Your post works, but returns a redirect to a nother
page, which returns nothing. This will look exactly like notyhing
happened at the browser side.
Yes, looking at Z2.log it seems it but If I execute the action url
manually it works
bruno modulix escribió:
Garito wrote:
Lennart Regebro escribió:
A wild guess: Your post works, but returns a redirect to a nother
page, which returns nothing. This will look exactly like notyhing
happened at the browser side.
Yes, looking at Z2.log it seems it but If I
hi there!
either this is a bug or i'm too stoned to see, what's going on...
i have a folder /1, 2 subfolders /1/11 and /1/22. each subfolder
has a property 'bool', which is a boolean.
there's a zcatalog instance in /1/Catalog with one index bool, indexed
attribute 'bool'. i cataloged the two
Easy. The brain object doesn't have a 'getId()' method. The Catalog has.
What you're probably after is something like this::
for brain in context.Catalog.searchResults({'bool':1}):
cataloged_object = brain.getObject()
if cataloged_object is None:
print ZCatalog out of
i was dumb :)
the metadata table simply didn't have getId, so the brains object
acquires getId from the catalog.
sorry for my nubness ;P
regards, juergen herrmann
[ Peter Bengtsson wrote:]
Easy. The brain object doesn't have a 'getId()' method. The Catalog has.
What you're probably after is
--On 6. Juli 2005 12:44:00 +0200 Jürgen Herrmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi there!
either this is a bug or i'm too stoned to see, what's going on...
i have a folder /1, 2 subfolders /1/11 and /1/22. each subfolder
has a property 'bool', which is a boolean.
there's a zcatalog instance in
Ok, thanks a lot !
Pascal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andreas Jung
Sent: 05 July 2005 15:37
To: Pascal Peregrina; 'zope@zope.org'
Subject: Re: [Zope] About Zope 2.7.7
___
Zope maillist -
I have a regularly occuring WebDAV problem:
A file edited via ExternalEditor gets a WebDAV lock. Upon closing
(Textpad in this case) occasionally the lock is not released.
The lock is not listed in Control Panel WebDAV Lock Manager,
therefore cannot be released there.
Restarting Zope does
Garito wrote:
bruno modulix escribió:
Garito wrote:
Lennart Regebro escribió:
A wild guess: Your post works, but returns a redirect to a nother
page, which returns nothing. This will look exactly like notyhing
happened at the browser side.
Yes, looking at Z2.log it seems it but If I
Hi all!
I've been hacking together a few seperate paypal IPN connections, some
code from basion, and some from random web scrapings... Anyway...
Things are working for the most part, except that this method for some
reason dies when using urllib.urlopen(), and what is really wierd is
that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 2005-7-6 07:50 -0600:
...
The lock is not listed in Control Panel WebDAV Lock Manager,
therefore cannot be released there.
That looks like the bug you need to analyse.
There was not yet a need for me to try to understand how
WebDAV locking works. As you have the
Surely you get an error on the urlopen() bit because it's an HTTPS protocol.
Search the ASPN python cookbook or the google for https python
Next time, try to include your traceback in the email to the list.
On 7/6/05, Ed Colmar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
I've been hacking together a
I'd like to get session-based login going, and on the surface PAS appears to
support that.
First up, is there any documentation?
I've set up in my PAS acl_users the following objects:
1. cookies - a Cookie Auth Helper active for Challenge
2. session - a Session Auth Helper active for
O... is this surfaced through the Zope undo tab?
Chris
Tim Peters wrote:
Update of /cvs-repository/Packages/ZODB
In directory cvs.zope.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29971/ZODB
Modified Files:
Tag: Zope-2_7-branch
FileStorage.py
Log Message:
UndoSearch._readnext(): Add the transaction size to
On 7/3/05, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the current release model of Zope 2 is based on doing at least one beta
release for minor releases (Zope 2.7.X where X 0). I have the strong
impression that beta releases are not adopted and tested by most people.
They usually use the final
[Chris Withers]
O... is this surfaced through the Zope undo tab?
Try it. I'm sure that was Dieter's intent:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2003-October/006157.html
,,,'
The patch also enhances FileStorage and lets its UndoSearch._readnext
provide information
Hi!
Five comes with some code that bridges Zope 2 interfaces to Zope 3
interfaces. This way Zope 2 interface definitions can be reused without
adding redundant code.
This is quite useful, but doesn't work for Zope core interfaces: Five
depends one many Zope core packages and using Five
On 7/6/05, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Five comes with some code that bridges Zope 2 interfaces to Zope 3
interfaces. This way Zope 2 interface definitions can be reused without
adding redundant code.
This is quite useful, but doesn't work for Zope core interfaces: Five
depends one many
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 7/6/05, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Five comes with some code that bridges Zope 2 interfaces to Zope 3
interfaces. This way Zope 2 interface definitions can be reused without
adding redundant code.
This is quite useful, but doesn't work for Zope core interfaces:
On 7/6/05, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Did I understand that correctly, it is a problem if you want to use
Five *from* zope core code?
Correct. It's not always a problem, but the bridging code doesn't depend
on anything else in Five, so I guess moving that code
28 matches
Mail list logo
