Hi Miguel
First, you could drop the Unauthorized Exception from the error_log
object in the root folder of the zope management interface. Then
activate the verbose-security option in your zope.conf file. To do
this, you need to put/replace this lines:
security-policy-implementation python
Hi Miguel,
Is the dtml page accessable by the role myuser has? Did you set the
Use Database Methods permission for that role?
Hi Miguel
First, you could drop the Unauthorized Exception from the error_log
object in the root folder of the zope management interface. Then
activate the
#Martijn
Yes, have role manager
#Josef
After change options and restart
Z2.log:
10.28.1.18 - admin [18/Apr/2008:17:01:08 +0200] GET
/Control_Panel/manage_main HTTP/1.1 200 8023 Mozilla/5.0
(Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; es-AR; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404
Firefox/2.0.0.14
10.28.1.18 - Anonymous
Miguel Beltran R. wrote:
#Martijn
Yes, have role manager
What if you login with the user with your webbrowser instead of your
python program?
--
Martijn Jacobs
Four Digits, Internet Solutions
a: Willemsplein 15-1 6811 KB Arnhem NL
kvk: 09162137 | btw: 8161.22.234.B01
e-mail:
Using web browser work fine.
Using wireshark I see what my python program not send WWW-Authentification.
Now I going to python list. But if someone know how can tell me please
2008/4/18, Martijn Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Miguel Beltran R. wrote:
#Martijn
Yes, have role manager
I have a very old python script which does want you want, I can send it
to you if you like.
Martijn
Using web browser work fine.
Using wireshark I see what my python program not send WWW-Authentification.
Now I going to python list. But if someone know how can tell me please
2008/4/18,
Yes please
and thakns to every body
2008/4/18, Martijn Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have a very old python script which does want you want, I can send it to
you if you like.
Martijn
Using web browser work fine.
Using wireshark I see what my python program not send
Simon,
I created a zexp that demonstrates the use of extjs and zope but I
don't know where to put it for anyone that might be interested. Can
the wiki.zope.org/zope2 site accept .zexp uploads?
This zexp doesn't require the installation of extjs to see how it
works because it uses the extjs
Miguel Beltran R. wrote:
Yes please
and thakns to every body
Here you go :
#!/bin/python
import base64
import urllib2
base64string = base64.encodestring('%s:%s' % (username, password))
url = http://10.28.1.239/bitacoras/alta/estado2.html;
req = urllib2.Request(url)
Log message for revision 85467:
Remember that Hanno's fix should probably be made in zope.app.pagetemplate.
Changed:
U
Zope/branches/philikon-aq/lib/python/Products/Five/browser/pagetemplatefile.py
-=-
Modified:
Log message for revision 85468:
Improve doctest paragraph about calling templates that are instance variables.
Changed:
U
Zope/branches/philikon-aq/lib/python/Products/Five/browser/tests/aqlegacy.py
U
Zope/branches/philikon-aq/lib/python/Products/Five/browser/tests/aqlegacy.zcml
Paul Carduner wrote:
Log message for revision 85449: creating a branch to see what I can
do about extjs integration.
I found Jim removing two of his extjs related libraries from svn due
to license issues (r85246, r85248).
Please make sure that there is no license issue for your work
Tres Seaver wrote:
The second problem that might arise, is that the implicit assumption
that every object inside Zope 2 inherits from Acquisition base classes
no longer holds. Code that relies on the various aq_* attributes to be
there need to be adjusted to use the Acquisition methods
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Apr 17 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Apr 18 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Apr 17 21:00:05 EDT 2008
URL:
Previously Baiju M wrote:
Since extjs is released under LGPL, I guess you can release the library in a
similar license, but only ZPL licensed thing can be committed to our svn :(
There is still an ongoing debate about that even - the extjs authors
basically only want to offer LGPL to you if you
On Friday 18 April 2008, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
There is still an ongoing debate about that even - the extjs authors
basically only want to offer LGPL to you if you meet certain criteria
but won't allow you to redistribute it with just standard LGPL
licensing.
I just researched this a little
Tres Seaver wrote:
[snip]
The second problem that might arise, is that the implicit assumption
that every object inside Zope 2 inherits from Acquisition base classes
no longer holds. Code that relies on the various aq_* attributes to be
there need to be adjusted to use the Acquisition methods
On Apr 18, 2008, at 14:09 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 18 April 2008, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
There is still an ongoing debate about that even - the extjs authors
basically only want to offer LGPL to you if you meet certain criteria
but won't allow you to redistribute it with just
On Apr 18, 2008, at 4:28 AM, Baiju M wrote:
Paul Carduner wrote:
Log message for revision 85449: creating a branch to see what I can
do about extjs integration.
I found Jim removing two of his extjs related libraries from svn due
to license issues (r85246, r85248).
Please make sure that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
The second problem that might arise, is that the implicit assumption
that every object inside Zope 2 inherits from Acquisition base classes
no longer holds. Code that relies on the various aq_*
On Friday 18 April 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
Because of ExtJS licensing issues, we should not check anything into
the repository that builds on or requires ExtJS in any way.
I assume you got lawyer advice; can you elaborate with a few more sentences
why? (I did read their license stuff last
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Merging it into Zope trunk will get it into the Zope 2.12 release
which is at this point not scheduled yet, but is unlikely to get a
release before early 2009. This should give us plenty
On Apr 18, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 18 April 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
Because of ExtJS licensing issues, we should not check anything into
the repository that builds on or requires ExtJS in any way.
I assume you got lawyer advice;
No.
can you elaborate with a
23 matches
Mail list logo
