Tres Seaver wrote:
ZRS secondaries go into "recovery mode" whenever they lose connection
with the promary: that recovery is sufficient to allow it to resync
(even to bring up a new, "empty" secondary).
Hi Tres. This is sort of how I envisioned ZRS (though I have never seen
or used it). I tho
Hi. I have been experimenting with making a hybrid storage for zodb. The
storage seems to work well except that I am getting this error on the
first request to the server and I am not exactly sure where it is coming
from.
Error Type: TypeError
Error Value: unbound method method_descriptor obje
Application instance as first argument (got RequestContainer instance
instead)
The third GET always succeeds (200 ok) in allowing authentication. The
instance behaves as normal in every regard afterwards.
This only occurs on startup.
Regards,
David
David Pratt wrote:
Hi. I have been e
load objects with the initial threads to the storage
before serving requests.
Regards
David
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 7. Mai 2006 09:04:54 -0300 David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got a bit more information from my Z2.log:
On a normal startup attempt with data.fs:
I managed a fix to my threading and it solved my trouble. It was a bit
sidetracked earlier with the Type Error message. My hunch was right in
the end. Many thanks.
Regards,
David
David Pratt wrote:
Hi Andreas. I have been experimenting with creating backend storages for
zope. There is no
Can someone point me to Zope2 running Twisted server from Paris ecm
sprint. I see at least three branches that look like Z2 Twisted
refactoring in the svn. Can someone explain differences between these.
Many thanks.
Regards,
David
___
Zope maillist
Wow. That's great. I realize this is all still experimental but will
https server be added to the mix?
Regards,
David
Andreas Jung wrote:
The stuff has been merged on the Zope trunk and is documented in the
CHANGE.txt file.
-aj
--On 17. Mai 2006 10:00:47 -0300 David Pratt <[EMAIL P
Hi. I am trying to get a better sense of how others are dealing with ZPL
headers in code from original authors once changes are made. For example
if a package is ZPL copyright somebody, I typically see a header at the
top of most files as well as the LICENSE.txt in the package itself. When
chan
6 00:53:09 -0300 David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi. I am trying to get a better sense of how others are dealing with ZPL
headers in code from original authors once changes are made. For example
if a package is ZPL copyright somebody, I typically see a header at the
top of most file
Hi Stephan. This is some really awesome work and some great new examples
as well. There is more to explore and to anticipate with ajax - it is
all really very excellent. When running the demo, I needed to add
zope.rdb to the setup.py and its corresponding meta and configuration
files to site.z
,
again thanks to the great feedback we received -- especially from David Pratt,
Roy Mathew, and Joachim Werner -- we were able to fine-tune our new form
framework even more to make it as robust of a foundation as possible for your
projects! New features include group support, fully internationalized
Very nice. Many thanks for this.
Regards,
David
Baiju M wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am happy to announce that the second Foliage sprint task is
completed. Julian Bonilla, Graham Stratton and I worked on the
outstanding issues on creating a functional version of the APIDOC
Hi Ross. The ZPL is a brief and concise license. It is clear on
providing attribution of authors and copyright. The other requirements
it imposes are fairly minimal. Other than this, it permits the code to
be used in virtually any manner. The components in the Zope repository
upon which Zope an
I would also agree the different license has caused this issue. I don't
think that it is beneficial to rehash past decisions but better to offer
up solutions that are reasonably considered.
The problem posed is that that GPL'd code will normally have only GPL
consumers. To this end, there is n
Hi Hugo. I believe 'file is not of required architecture' may be the
clue here. Ever since mac went to universal binaries, folks with ppc
have been having trouble since it is compiled with i386 arch flags and
vice versa for folks with intel macs (with ppc arch flags). The only way
to get around
o
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:01 AM, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hugo. I believe 'file is not of required architecture' may be the
clue here. Ever since mac went to universal binaries, folks with ppc
have been having trouble since it is compiled with i386 arch flags
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
