Hi Jan-Wij,
+1 for implementing convenient CSRF.
I wonder if you could make your implementation more orthogonal by
implementing a CSRF field/widget, and make your `protected` attribute
simply trigger the inclusion of this field implicitly.
This way you wouldn't need to change the `*pageform.pt`
Thanks!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Stephan Richter
stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 04:43:17 PM Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Can anyone please migrate five.grok to GitHub?
Done.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. Zope
Hi repository specialists,
Can anyone please migrate five.grok to GitHub?
Some people have fixes for it, but don't want to touch SVN ever again,
like its some sort of plague...
Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Leo
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Cool, looks nice!
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I wanted to have an up-to-date status page for the status of the Python
3 porting efforts of various zope-ish packages, so I made one:
http://zope3.pov.lt/py3/
Source for the data extraction bits:
Hi Jens,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
[...] All other repositories (Zope, Products.*) were test migrations where I
asked for feedback and never got any. They are throw-away and not final. The
only finished migrations are yours and Tres'.
I've
Here's Guido's official explanation for the divmod behaviour:
http://python-history.blogspot.com.br/2010/08/why-pythons-integer-division-floors.html
IMHO we should treat negative offsets specially, doing the divmod()
with -60 in that case.
Regards,
Leo
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Juan A.
Hi Silvain,
Thanks for the deep analysis. Did you put this code in a branch
somewhere for us to take a look?
Cheers,
Leo
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently find out I had a memory leak in Silva, with Python 2.7. After
playing a
Hi,
This is the mailing list to discuss development of Zope itself. It's
not strictly a support mailing list. You should likely contact:
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
In any case, by googling [libmysqlclient_r.so.15 centos 6]
I found this page:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:31 AM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
CMF uses some ZTUtils in restricted code: Batch, LazyFilter, make_query and
SimpleTreeMaker. The new Zope 2 releases (2.12.24 and 2.13.17) are not
Zope4 Lille Sprint 2012 Report
The first thing we did was discuss the state of contributions to the
Zope codebase, specially in light of many vocal members of the
community that would like to use GitHub (and other members, less
numerous but equally vocal, who would not like to use GitHub at all,
Sorry for the missing subject. Hit Send too fast.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Zope4 Lille Sprint 2012 Report
The first thing we did was discuss the state of contributions to the
Zope codebase, specially in light of many vocal members
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, j...@nexedi.com wrote:
This approach protects from:
- legal risks posed by github
Such as?
I'll let Jean-Paul elaborate, but I suppose it could be something
along the lines of
Speaking of handling command line options and eventually having (or
not) an interactive interpreter, I'd like to point out Michele
Simionato's plac.
http://plac.googlecode.com/hg/doc/plac.html
Just to throught it out there...
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Fred Drake f...@fdrake.net wrote:
On
+1 for merging
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Uli Fouquet u...@gnufix.de wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2012 21:09:44 -0400 Tres Seaver wrote:
On 05/27/2012 07:36 PM, Ulrich Fouquet wrote:
Log message for revision 126504: Do menu-related configuration only if
z.a.zcmlfiles is available.
Changed:
Hi Uli,
Thanks for taking care of this.
IMHO:
Move to a conditional include of a menu.zcml that (or include a
menu.zcml file that conditionally) registers the browser menus for
zmi_views and release a new minor version, declaring an extra
dependency on the packages that provides zmi_views. With
! :-) Hope you're doing fine as well...
On Sun, 27 May 2012 16:16:43 +0200 Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
IMHO:
Move to a conditional include of a menu.zcml that (or include a
menu.zcml file that conditionally) registers the browser menus for
zmi_views and release a new minor version, declaring
Not ZCA/ZODB maintainer, but a big +1 from me.
I've also experienced the negative effects of missing code for
(marker) interfaces in persistent data.
Cheers,
Leo
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 22:04, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
experimental.broken is working well for me. It greatly
Hi,
Anyone going to this PyConUS who would like to sprint on Zope4?
Topics of particular interest to me include security (as I explained
in a previous e-mail) and the new ZMI.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Hi,
Sorry for the cross-post, but I'd like to talk about a possible sprint
topic for the next DZUG sprint[1], and invite myself to it :-)
After the last two rather serious security issues that were recently
patched in the Zope2 code base, it is increasingly clear to me that,
differently than
Hi,
Congratulations on this move, must have been a nice technical challenge.
And although I wholeheartedly agree with it, there is a part of me
that is sad to know that the old zope.org Zope insance has been shut
down for good.
Leo
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:35, Jens Vagelpohl
Hi Joshua,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:59, Joshua Immanuel j...@hipro.co.in wrote:
[...] Worse case scenario is where I have a cancel
action button which just redirects to another page, that too screams for
the NameAlreadyExists error.
For the 'cancel button' case, you need to have a form
Hi Malthe,
How often is the adaptation called?
For example, suppose a Page Template had a tal:repeat that rendered a
macro inside of it. If that tal:repeat looped 5 times, do we get 5
more adaptation calls, besides the call of the outermost Page
Template?
Just asking out of curiosity, I haven't
Hi Hanno,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:18, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would've thought it would also be possible for those who rely on this to
maintain the relevant eggs as optional installations
Hi Hanno,
From the point of view of the ERP5 codebase, this direction for Zope2
should be mostly ok, save for a few comments below:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 03:41, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote
Hi Hanno,
I haven't checked deeply, but the change below seems to break
Products.ZSQLMethods. At least there is an import in
Products.ZSQLMethod from this location. And we depend heavily on it...
Since you're already around that piece of code, would you mind moving
it over there and releasing a
Hi Morten,
OK. Well I have this function now:
def _(msgid, request):
language = request['LANGUAGE']
return translate(msgid, domain='SimpleChat', target_language=language)
Which sends all the relevant bits to the translate function. But, this
doesn't work either, and I can see it
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:55, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I am happy to announce that we have made progress
with the zope.org relaunch project. The first public
version of the new site is now available under
Hi,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:52, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Hi there,
On 05/10/2011 06:55 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
Constructive criticism and feedback is welcome _now_.
Application servers has Zope BlueBream.
[...]
Speaking of
http://beta.zope.org/the-world-of-zope
I usually saw this error when some of the objects persisted in the
ZODB have references to (i.e. they directly provide) interfaces that
are not there in the code anymore anymore, such as when an interface
class is removed or moved to another module or package.
It can be solved by providing the
This being PloneConf week, it's not surprising the attendance was even
lower than usual.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 08:55, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
Hi,
On 10/26/2010 09:14 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
[...]
This week my job of summarizing is suprisingly easy: nothing to
Log message for revision 114755:
Missing changelog for the ImageFile warning
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst 2010-07-14
Log message for revision 114749:
Warn on App.ImageFile.ImageFile deprecated assumption of software_home
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/src/App/ImageFile.py
U Zope/branches/2.12/src/App/config.py
A Zope/branches/2.12/src/App/tests/testImageFile.py
-=-
Modified:
Log message for revision 114757:
Warn on App.ImageFile.ImageFile deprecated assumption of software_home.
Forward ported 114749 from 2.12 branch
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/trunk/src/App/ImageFile.py
U Zope/trunk/src/App/config.py
A
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 19:22, Benji York be...@benjiyork.com wrote:
[...]
Let me make sure I understand your setup: you have a TemporaryStorage
running on a central server that is exposed via ZEO to clients. Right?
So, when the ZEO server restarts the temp storage is reset (it's
contents
Hi,
The latest Zope 2.12.9 release broke the last release of Products.ZMySQLDA.
To demonstrate, bootstrap and run the attached buildout, then run:
$ bin/py -c import Shared.DC.ZRDB, Products.ZMySQLDA
You'll get the following traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File bin/py, line
Hi
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:44, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
[...]
You'll get the following traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File bin/py, line 107, in module
exec _val
File string, line 1, in module
File
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 14:46, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
And I'm not disagreeing with the policy, but it can be argued that
depending on the location of *data* files inside the Zope2 package
Log message for revision 113726:
branch has been merged
Changed:
D Zope/branches/rochael-TM_sortKey/
-=-
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
This should've gone to zope-dev too.
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 23:14, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tres,
That file was brand new from this year. I just copied a copyright
boilerplate that contained 2009 and pasted into the file before adding
it to the repository
Log message for revision 113621:
record setSortKey() changes
Changed:
U Zope/branches/rochael-TM_sortKey/doc/CHANGES.rst
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/rochael-TM_sortKey/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
---
Log message for revision 113622:
merge branch rochael-TM_sortKey: add a setSortKey method to
Shared.setSortKey() method to Shared.DC.ZRDB.TM.TM
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/branches/2.12/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py
A
Log message for revision 113623:
merge branch rochael-TM_sortKey: add a setSortKey method to
Shared.setSortKey() method to Shared.DC.ZRDB.TM.TM
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/trunk/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py
A Zope/trunk/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/tests/testTM.py
-=-
Modified:
Log message for revision 113624:
ReST changes, and it's a new year already
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/branches/2.12/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/tests/testTM.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
Hi Laurence
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:06, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
On 18 June 2010 01:24, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, this issue is completely separate from the
two-phase-commit discussion that we had recently, since all the
connectors
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
In any case, does anyone oppose the existence of a .setSortKey() on
the TM class?
Your branch looks simple enough. Feel free
Log message for revision 113596:
branch for adjustable sortKey() for Shared.DC.ZRDB.TM
Changed:
A Zope/branches/rochael-TM_sortKey/
-=-
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
Log message for revision 113597:
make the result of Shared.DC.ZRDB.TM.TM.sortKey() adjustable
Changed:
U Zope/branches/rochael-TM_sortKey/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py
A Zope/branches/rochael-TM_sortKey/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/tests/testTM.py
-=-
Modified:
Hi,
In ERP5[1], which is CMF based, we have a number of strategies for
high performance and scalability. One of these is that we have
ZSQLCatalog extensively. The other is that we delay execution of
potentially expensive operations (like indexing) for background
execution. For the latter, we
Thanks Tres and Sidnei,
My questions were intended to go to the list anyway.
Can we take a branch from the launchpad mirror and bind it back
directly at svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/ to commit?
For instance, say I'm reviewing a bugfix proposed by someone that
doesn't currently have access to
Log message for revision 109929:
fix lp #534653, reset *CacheManager module level cache id on clone
Changed:
U
Zope/branches/2.12/src/Products/StandardCacheManagers/AcceleratedHTTPCacheManager.py
U Zope/branches/2.12/src/Products/StandardCacheManagers/RAMCacheManager.py
A
Log message for revision 109931:
forward port r109929: fix for lp #534653
Changed:
_U Zope/trunk/
U
Zope/trunk/src/Products/StandardCacheManagers/AcceleratedHTTPCacheManager.py
U Zope/trunk/src/Products/StandardCacheManagers/RAMCacheManager.py
A
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 07:18, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 04:56, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyG5Qee5wbs
Heh, nice! :-)
Except that the song in this clip is what weddings in Brazil
traditionally play in the part where
Log message for revision 107725:
LP #246983: Unicode conflict resolution on variables inside 'string:'
expressions
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
U
Zope/branches/2.12/src/Products/Five/browser/tests/test_pagetemplatefile.py
U
Log message for revision 107726:
merge 107725 from 2.12: fix for LP #246983
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/trunk/src/Products/Five/browser/tests/test_pagetemplatefile.py
U Zope/trunk/src/Products/PageTemplates/Expressions.py
U
We've been through this option recently already. It has been quickly
shot down by those who want interfaces to get the new behaviour
immediately available in existing interfaces, instead of having to
rewrite already existing interfaces to support the new API.
Painful memories of a time when we
Funny you should mention this, I've got this idea bugging for a few
weeks now, after the last thread:
Have the zope.interface package expose a single overridable hook:
def getInterfaceAttribute(iface, name, default):
This method would be called by any attempt to look up an interface
attribute
For my 2 cents (not that I think anyone should care):
+1 for IFoo.adapt[er](*args, **kw) and IFoo.utility(*kw)
-1 for tuple adaptation on 1st arg. Besides losing genericity on tuple
adaptation, we risk situations where a class could trigger
multi-adaptation by inheriting from tuple.
+1 for
I find it rather odd that we're wasting so much time worrying about
backward incompatibility when we have a perfect mechanism to introduce
backward incompatible changes in a way that allows both flavours to be
used by packages in the same application (on a module by module basis
just like Martijn
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 14:34, Benji York be...@zope.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Wilkes
matt...@matthewwilkes.co.uk wrote:
On 2009-11-25, at 1601, Benji York wrote:
I'm not sure I like the following suggestion better than the above, but
throwing it out there anyway:
Wouldn't it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? Is
there a reason for subscribing to such an event which would required
the transaction to be aborted already? I can see the usefulness of the
transaction being already doom()ed before this event, but not aborted.
On Wed, Nov 11,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:29, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? [...]
I can see the usefulness of the
transaction being already doom()ed before this event, but not aborted
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:30, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/16 Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com:
So HTTP seems to contradict itself, typically But from looking at
other peoples responses, most interpret the specification that the
connection should immediately be closed, so
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 16:36, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
[...]
You might also look at fixing varnish: I don't know of any valid
reason for it to be using the half-open connection model to test that
an HTTP-based backend is up
Going out on a limb here, but I think Varnish might
Log message for revision 105097:
Forward port 105096 to trunk. Missed Globals removal.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/Connection.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/Connection.py
===
---
Log message for revision 105096:
Tres, you missed a spot
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/Connection.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.12/src/Shared/DC/ZRDB/Connection.py
===
---
Log message for revision 105060:
Fix HelpSys to work with zope.interface.Interface as it did before the
deprecated methods of scarecrow Interface.Interface were removed.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/src/HelpSys/APIHelpTopic.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.12/src/HelpSys/APIHelpTopic.py
Log message for revision 105062:
Merge 105060 from branch 2.12: Fix HelpSys to work with
zope.interface.Interface as it did before the deprecated methods of scarecrow
Interface.Interface were removed.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/HelpSys/APIHelpTopic.py
-=-
Modified:
Log message for revision 71167:
revert ZCatalog.getobject() semantics not to mask traversal errors and not to
fallback to .resolve_url() when the traversal result is None
Changed:
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py
U
Log message for revision 71168:
revert ZCatalog.getobject() semantics not to mask traversal errors and not to
fallback to .resolve_url() when the traversal result is None
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.9/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py
U
Log message for revision 71169:
revert ZCatalog.getobject() semantics not to mask traversal errors and not to
fallback to .resolve_url() when the traversal result is None
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py
U
Log message for revision 71170:
revert ZCatalog.getobject() semantics not to mask traversal errors and not to
fallback to .resolve_url() when the traversal result is None
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py
U
Em Sex, 2006-11-17 às 07:48 +, Chris Withers escreveu:
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
[]
This is the full method before my changes:
def getobject(self, rid, REQUEST=None):
Return a cataloged object given a 'data_record_id_'
obj
.
--
Leonardo Rochael Almeida
Enfold Systems
http://www.enfoldsystems.com
phone. +1.713.942.2377 Ext 215
fax. +1.832.201.8856
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding
Hi Chris,
Em Qui, 2006-11-16 às 07:33 +, Chris Withers escreveu:
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
@@ -615,8 +615,8 @@
def getobject(self, rid, REQUEST=None):
Return a cataloged object given a 'data_record_id_'
-obj
Log message for revision 71132:
fix for #2235: ZCatalog triggering boolean evaluation of objects
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.9/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/branches/2.9/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py
U Zope/branches/2.9/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/tests/testCatalog.py
-=-
Log message for revision 71133:
typo in CHANGES.txt
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.9/doc/CHANGES.txt
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.9/doc/CHANGES.txt
===
--- Zope/branches/2.9/doc/CHANGES.txt 2006-11-15 08:05:34 UTC (rev
Log message for revision 71135:
fix for #2235: ZCatalog triggering boolean evaluation of objects
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py
U Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/tests/testCatalog.py
-=-
Log message for revision 71136:
fix for #2235: ZCatalog triggering boolean evaluation of objects
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/tests/testCatalog.py
-=-
Modified:
Log message for revision 71127:
fix #2235 for real now
Changed:
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py
U
Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/tests/testCatalog.py
-=-
.
--
Leonardo Rochael Almeida
Enfold Systems
http://www.enfoldsystems.com
phone. +1.713.942.2377 Ext 215
fax. +1.832.201.8856
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding
Hi,
Em Seg, 2006-01-16 às 16:20 +0100, Godefroid Chapelle escreveu:
Hi,
While seaching for objects of all types containing some text through the
ZMI find tab, I got the traceback hereunder. (Zope 2.7.8-final on
windows)
Traceback (innermost last):
[...]
Module OFS.Image, line
Just as a data point.
A lot of autoconf projects (the ones that made ./configure; make; make
install famous) don't just run like that from a checkout, but they are
never more than 2 steps away from that.
The process for a checkout is usually more like
./autoconf; ./automake; ./configure; make;
Hi all,
Em Dom, 2005-11-27 às 21:26 +0100, Florent Guillaume escreveu:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
The first change is in the manage_pasteObjects method of CopyContainer.
There are some _setObject and _delObject calls which grew a new
suppress_events parameter. [...]
Several Folder like
Hi Florent
Em Ter, 2005-11-29 às 15:32 +0100, Florent Guillaume escreveu:
[...]
I'm a bit peeved though at the lack of willingness from the few people that
have reimplemented their version of _setObject/_delObject (which could be
considered private APIs, seeing that they're prefixed with an
Em Qui, 2005-08-04 às 08:39 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl escreveu:
On 4 Aug 2005, at 01:01, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Hi,
I've started the lra-userid_username_separation-branch (from
Zope-2_8-branch to start from a stable point) in order to implement
proper userid/username separation
Em Qui, 2005-08-04 às 16:20 -0300, Leonardo Rochael Almeida escreveu:
I propose that we look up the userid for the username in
RoleManager.manage_{add,set,del}LocalRoles() and change the signature of
these methods to mention username instead of userid.
And we also need to change
, but
a Google search didn't help much.
Are there any other projects in this area that I should colaborate with
instead of duplicating efforts?
Are there any considerations I should be aware of?
Is the Proposals wiki pages still used for this kind of change?
Cheers, Leo
--
Leonardo Rochael
part of a portal_skins setup and deal with
it. Alternativelly, portal_skins should provide the functionality of
expiring RAMCached subitems.
--
Leonardo Rochael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org
if it's empty, or it could implement
__nonzero__() and be considered false even when you want to return it.
Cheers, Leo
--
Leonardo Rochael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
will only be made
effective AFTER all ZConfig configuration has been processed...
Any pointers? Should this go right into the collector?
Cheers, Leo
--
Leonardo Rochael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enfold Systems - http://www.enfolsystems.com/
___
Zope-Dev
Em Seg, 2005-02-14 às 13:36 -0500, Fred Drake escreveu:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:22:38 -0200, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's obvious that the container-class directive is being evaluated
much earlier than the products directive. Without delving further into
the code
Em Ter, 2004-10-12 às 00:23, Kapil Thangavelu escreveu:
i believe you were referring to
http://freedesktop.org/Software/shared-mime-info
spec
http://freedesktop.org/Standards/shared-mime-info-spec
its a system wide shared mime database for use by applications (ie. both
gnome and kde).
() and .setVirtualRoot()
Documentation for those can be found in the Zope Online Help and other
places.
Cheers, Leo
--
Leonardo Rochael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
Em Qua, 2004-08-18 às 12:22, Ames Andreas (MPA/DF) escreveu:
[...]
Questions:
- Is this the right forum/place to send patches to?
This is the right forum to discuss the patches, and to send them for
evaluation if it's a small one, like yours. The best place to actually
send patches to is
Forgot to Cc: zope-dev
-Mensagem encaminhada-
From: Leonardo Rochael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Santi Camps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Referencial Integrity in ZCatalogs
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:05:53 -0300
I would suggest you take a look at mxmRelations, however
+1 for member-only posting
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 22:24, Tim Peters wrote:
Over on the zope and zope-dev lists, there's currently agitation to make
them members-only mailing lists. The point is that spam could not get thru
then (unless posted by a member).
What would zodb-dev members like?
This next Friday (25th) is the last friday of the month. Are we going to
have a bugday?
Cheers, Leo
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 11:59, Casey Duncan wrote:
-1 on changing the list policy. I read and post to all of the public
lists through Gmane, which won't work if the policy is changed.
I rarely see spam get through list either (unless Gmane is filtering it
all out for me), so I fail to see
you do not have access to one of the containing folders.
I certainly hope he'd get a permission error instead of silent 'None'
for '.getObject()' in this case or I'd consider it a bug :-)
Cheers, Leo
--
Leonardo Rochael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 11:56, Lennart Regebro wrote:
From: Ken Manheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb. Can you suggest a
verb the more clearly indicates the result is won't fix?
Tough one...
Live with
Ignore
Keep this bug as is
Zenify
1 - 100 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
