Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-19 Thread Dieter Maurer
Chris Withers wrote at 2006-3-17 19:54 +: Chris Kratz wrote: How does the refresh interval work for DirectoryView? When zope is in dev mode, each time an fs-based object is rendered, it checks to see if it has changed on disk. This is pretty quick on linux, but can have issues on

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-17 Thread Chris Withers
Paul Winkler wrote: 1. Allow use of source control (branching, diffs, revision history, etc) on all content types as plain text files, not python pickles. 2. Allow editing of zope objects (DTML, ZPT, ZSQL, py script) externally in appropriate editor. 3. Allow us to quickly push out minor

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-17 Thread Chris Withers
Chris Kratz wrote: How does the refresh interval work for DirectoryView? When zope is in dev mode, each time an fs-based object is rendered, it checks to see if it has changed on disk. This is pretty quick on linux, but can have issues on windows. In production mode, it is cached from the

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Withers
Paul Winkler wrote: On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:29:05PM +, Chris Withers wrote: Ouch, DirectoryViews are more likely what you want... Sure, they're great. But through the web they are read-only. That's hardly a complete replacement for Ape. Depends on CK's real needs of course. Let's

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Withers
Hi Chris, Please keep replies on the list... Chris Kratz wrote: Thanks for the pointers. But, isn't directory view part of plone? Yes, but they are more a part of CMF. You can either just install the CMFCore product, or I remember there being a couple of packagings on DirectoryView on

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Kratz
Now, if using svn for source control is the only reason he was using APE, surely you'd agree that DirecotyViews are a more appropriate method? cheers, Chris Yes, you are more or less correct. The primary reason we went to APE was after having tried the nightmares of the various zope cvs

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-16 Thread Paul Winkler
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:00:11AM -0500, Chris Kratz wrote: Now, if using svn for source control is the only reason he was using APE, surely you'd agree that DirecotyViews are a more appropriate method? cheers, Chris Yes, you are more or less correct. The primary reason we went

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Kratz
On Thursday 16 March 2006 12:18 pm, Paul Winkler wrote: On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:00:11AM -0500, Chris Kratz wrote: Now, if using svn for source control is the only reason he was using APE, surely you'd agree that DirecotyViews are a more appropriate method? cheers, Chris

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-16 Thread Paul Winkler
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:59:04PM -0500, Chris Kratz wrote: Hello Paul, How does the refresh interval work for DirectoryView? If I wrote it in english, it wouldn't be any shorter than the code in CMFCore/FSObject.py :-) See the _updateFromFS() method, you can browse it on svn.zope.org. --

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-16 Thread jpenny
I am perhaps being too lazy here. What is the minimal CMF stuff to install to get the CMFCore/FS... objcts installed? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/16/2006 03:05:45 PM: On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:59:04PM -0500, Chris Kratz wrote: Hello Paul, How does the refresh interval work for

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-16 Thread Paul Winkler
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 05:54:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am perhaps being too lazy here. What is the minimal CMF stuff to install to get the CMFCore/FS... objcts installed? I suspect you can download CMF from zope.org, unzip it, and install only the CMFCore directory. It shouldn't

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-15 Thread Chris Withers
Chris Kratz wrote: We are very interested in this as well. We have a large application using Apelib right now to persist our zope application onto the filesystem so we can use subversion. Ouch, DirectoryViews are more likely what you want... ...and maybe GenericSetup for the rest. cheers,

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-15 Thread Paul Winkler
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:29:05PM +, Chris Withers wrote: Chris Kratz wrote: We are very interested in this as well. We have a large application using Apelib right now to persist our zope application onto the filesystem so we can use subversion. Ouch, DirectoryViews are more likely

RE: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-14 Thread Doyon, Jean-Francois
To: zope@zope.org Subject: Re: [Zope] Re: Ape On Saturday 11 March 2006 11:16 am, Shane Hathaway wrote: Dennis Allison wrote: I am looking to map a portion of the local file system into Zope. One way to do this is to use LocalFS, another is to use Ape. I am sure there are onter approaches

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-14 Thread Chris Kratz
:( J.F. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Kratz Sent: March 13, 2006 3:07 PM To: zope@zope.org Subject: Re: [Zope] Re: Ape On Saturday 11 March 2006 11:16 am, Shane Hathaway wrote: Dennis Allison wrote: I am looking

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-13 Thread Chris Kratz
On Saturday 11 March 2006 11:16 am, Shane Hathaway wrote: Dennis Allison wrote: I am looking to map a portion of the local file system into Zope. One way to do this is to use LocalFS, another is to use Ape. I am sure there are onter approaches as well. We are using Zop 2.9.X. Will Ape