[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 9 OK

2007-02-06 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Feb 5 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Tue Feb 6 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : CMF-1.5 Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Feb 5 21:40:38 EST

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Rocky
On Feb 5, 5:40 pm, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5 Feb 2007, at 19:43, Rocky Burt wrote: On Feb 2, 4:41 pm, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, sounds good, I misunderstood your email. I suppose the last bit left to do now is the custom site manager. Rocky? :) Yep,

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Rocky
On Feb 6, 5:45 pm, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right now all you need to do to install CMF is to link all the contained folders into the instance Products folder. I'm somewhat averse to complicate that process. I understand the sentiment and we dealt with the same thing for Plone.

[Zope-CMF] Re: List available on groups.google.com

2007-02-06 Thread Rocky
On Feb 5, 5:43 pm, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hm... I thought gmane was plenty as far as searchable web integration goes. I don't use web interfaces to mailing lists, so I'm not sure where the advantage is. For me it's just the simple fact that I prefer using the google groups UI

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 06.02.2007 um 22:14 schrieb Rocky: Ultimately the closer we get to structuring our code deployment like regular python code the easier it will be to take advantage of things like distutils, eggs, the cheeseshop, etc. I look forward to doing: easy_install ZopeCMF I hate eggs and

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7 Feb 2007, at 00:36, Martin Aspeli wrote: Eggs make your life easier, especially if you want to use tools like workingenv.py or zc.buildout. Well, for simple work with the CMF like setting up a quick instance for hacking and development *I

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 07.02.2007 um 00:36 schrieb Martin Aspeli: Why? Is it the ability to specify sensible version restrictions? Have multiple versions of the same package as different dependencies for different dependents? Automatic downloading of dependencies where possible/desired? Standardised package

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Martin Aspeli
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7 Feb 2007, at 00:36, Martin Aspeli wrote: Eggs make your life easier, especially if you want to use tools like workingenv.py or zc.buildout. Well, for simple work with the CMF like setting up a quick instance for

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Martin Aspeli
Charlie Clark wrote: Am 07.02.2007 um 00:36 schrieb Martin Aspeli: Why? Is it the ability to specify sensible version restrictions? Have multiple versions of the same package as different dependencies for different dependents? Automatic downloading of dependencies where possible/desired?

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Charlie Clark wrote: Am 06.02.2007 um 22:14 schrieb Rocky: Ultimately the closer we get to structuring our code deployment like regular python code the easier it will be to take advantage of things like distutils, eggs, the cheeseshop, etc. I look forward to doing: easy_install ZopeCMF I

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 7 Feb 2007, at 00:36, Martin Aspeli wrote: Eggs make your life easier, especially if you want to use tools like workingenv.py or zc.buildout. Well, for simple work with the CMF like setting up a quick instance for hacking and development *I do not want to use any

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Martin Aspeli wrote: I don't think eggs/setuptools are perfect. But I don't think they're useless either, and on the whole, so far, they've brought more benefits than problems. By playing with eggs, we're playing better with the rest of the Python community (and things like entry points are

[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Rocky wrote: On Feb 5, 5:40 pm, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5 Feb 2007, at 19:43, Rocky Burt wrote: On Feb 2, 4:41 pm, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, sounds good, I misunderstood your email. I suppose the last bit left to do now is the custom site manager. Rocky?

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities

2007-02-06 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 2/7/07, Charlie Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 07.02.2007 um 00:36 schrieb Martin Aspeli: Why? Is it the ability to specify sensible version restrictions? Have multiple versions of the same package as different dependencies for different dependents? Automatic downloading of