Previously Charlie Clark wrote:
>
> Am 02.03.2009 um 19:46 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
>
> > This can happen in two ways, though. Either move the example-
> > application
> > bits into a different package or move the reusable bits into one. If
> > you
> > are really interested in doing this wor
Am 02.03.2009 um 19:46 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
> This can happen in two ways, though. Either move the example-
> application
> bits into a different package or move the reusable bits into one. If
> you
> are really interested in doing this work, I'd be happy to figure out
> what parts of CM
Am 02.03.2009 um 19:27 schrieb yuppie:
>>> This is on my todo list, but I still have to write a proposal.
>>
>> Hmm, I don't recall the issue here.
>
> There wasn't much discussion about this.
>
> Some time ago Dieter asked for grouping support:
> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2008-Sept
yuppie wrote:
> That would mean that CMFDefault-the-example-application will depend on
> z3c.form. If we are going to split off the forms we need to split off
> all browser views and the profiles that use these views. Something like
> 'cmf.app' that includes all the CMFDefault stuff Plone doesn'
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
> yuppie wrote:
>> 1.) look up add view actions in a different way
>> ---
>>
>> The current implementation is not flexible enough. There is no way to
>> sort or group these actions.
>>
>> This is on my todo list, but I still have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>>> I'll look at CMFCore and CMFDefault over the next few days (I'm
>>> traveling). Are there any code changes that you still need or is the
>>> current trunk state ready to
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sun Mar 1 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Mar 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun Mar 1 20:48:22 EST 2009
URL: ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 2, 2009, at 11:30 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> yuppie wrote:
>> 2.) get rid of redundant type info properties
>> -
>>
>> See http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2009-January/028059.html
>>
>> Unf
yuppie wrote:
> 2.) get rid of redundant type info properties
> -
>
> See http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2009-January/028059.html
>
> Unfortunately nobody seems to feel responsible for this.
My mail had: "I have one small todo item on my list
Hi!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> I'll look at CMFCore and CMFDefault over the next few days (I'm
>> traveling). Are there any code changes that you still need or is the
>> current trunk state ready to be released from your point of view?
>
> I haven't looked into it in gre
10 matches
Mail list logo