-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> Florent Guillaume wrote:
>
>> Stupid is in the eye of the beholder. You don't like something that's
>> useful for others so you want it to die. Congratulations for your
>> openmindedness. And you apparently can't grasp the idea
Hi Tres,
Tres Seaver wrote:
No, it isn't, at least in Zope. BLATHER is intended to be "summary"
information, useful for developers but not important enough to show by
default. DEBUG is for more detailed information, and TRACE is for
completely overwhelming detail.
Show me the docs in zope a
yuppie wrote:
By 'broken setups' I meant e.g. if you loose some catalog indexes on
export/import because no handler exists for those index classes. This is
a problem you should know about, but maybe you don't care or you fix
that by hand.
Ah, okay, I kinda agree here, and don't feel strongly
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Stupid is in the eye of the beholder. You don't like something that's
useful for others so you want it to die. Congratulations for your
openmindedness. And you apparently can't grasp the idea that there can
be different levels of informativeness.
Are you honestly tell
Hi Chris!
Chris Withers wrote:
yuppie wrote:
1.) It would be nice to have a policy for Zope. If the Zope core
officially supports the BLATHER level (not just in the deprecated zLOG
module) I'm fine with using it in GenericSetup as well.
It doesn't, ZODB has a mapping for it but it's a stupi
Chris Withers wrote:
yuppie wrote:
1.) It would be nice to have a policy for Zope. If the Zope core
officially supports the BLATHER level (not just in the deprecated zLOG
module) I'm fine with using it in GenericSetup as well.
It doesn't, ZODB has a mapping for it but it's a stupid name left
yuppie wrote:
1.) It would be nice to have a policy for Zope. If the Zope core
officially supports the BLATHER level (not just in the deprecated zLOG
module) I'm fine with using it in GenericSetup as well.
It doesn't, ZODB has a mapping for it but it's a stupid name left over
from before the
Hi Florent!
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I don't want to start another flamewar, but can I bump down the log
levels of CMF's exportimports a bit ?
INFO is too much.
The currently used log levels are provisional, I agree that we should
change at least most of them.
DEBUG or BLATHER ?
I can a
