The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
efge
- "CMFSetup: provide non-ascii im- and exports",
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/292
- "CMFSetup doesn't correctly detect DCWo
Alright, it's out now. I probably spent 90% of the last two hours
fighting zope.org which was near-unresponsive...
Anyway, since this is a beta the usual precautions apply:
- No non-critical-bugfix checkins on the CMF 1.5 branch until CMF
1.5.3 final is out
- Please help test the release,
The CMF developer community and Zope Corporation are pleased to
announce the release of version 1.5.3-beta of the Zope Content
Management
Framework (CMF). This release is intended for testing purposes only;
we do not recommend deploying it to production servers. The final
release of version 1.
Julien Anguenot wrote:
> Why don't you create your own FSXSLTemplate object ? It's pretty easy to
> register this kind of objects within the CMF using the dedicated
> registry. It might even sub-class FSPageTemplate if it makes sense in
> your case. I would do it like this myself.
We could, but k
On 2 Aug 2005, at 11:11, Duncan Booth wrote:
Julien Anguenot wrote:
Why don't you create your own FSXSLTemplate object ? It's pretty
easy to
register this kind of objects within the CMF using the dedicated
registry. It might even sub-class FSPageTemplate if it makes sense in
your case. I w
Hi!
Geoff Davis wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:30:20 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
It would help everyone if the CMF side opened up a little
more to ideas coming down from Plone, and if the Plone side stopped
reinventing wheels that would be much better off (and benefit
everyone) in the C
Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the discussion around Archetypes, in particular, ended up
> stalled over the question of whether to "code generation" design
> should be preferred over "configuration-based" design (as found in
> CPSSchemas, for instance).
Also now that Zope 3 is t
On 2 Aug 2005, at 13:27, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the discussion around Archetypes, in particular, ended up
stalled over the question of whether to "code generation" design
should be preferred over "configuration-based" design (as found in
CPSSc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I think the discussion around Archetypes, in particular, ended up
>>stalled over the question of whether to "code generation" design
>>should be preferred over "configuration-based
The general mindset of most Plone developers, as I perceive it from the
CMF side, seems to be one of "I'm in Plone code, and I know what to do
here, and I don't need to look beyond my world". Very few developers
have a broader view and even think of pushing generic functionality or
even s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
>
>> The general mindset of most Plone developers, as I perceive it from
>> the CMF side, seems to be one of "I'm in Plone code, and I know what
>> to do here, and I don't need to look beyond my world". Very few
>> developers h
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 2 Aug 2005, at 13:27, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the discussion around Archetypes, in particular, ended up
stalled over the question of whether to "code generation" design
should be preferred over "configuration-based" de
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the discussion around Archetypes, in particular, ended up
stalled over the question of whether to "code generation" design
should be preferred over "configuration-based" design (as found in
CPSSchemas, for instance).
Al
Florent Guillaume wrote:
However I'd like to urge the "Plone guys" (95% of which don't bother to
read or post in this list)
count me among the "plone guys" who lurk on this list... and among the
growing pool of reasonable folks who will advocate for and work towards
convergence.
-r
__
Geoff Davis wrote at 2005-8-1 12:53 -0400:
> ...
>* Are there any particular things in Plone that you think should be pushed
>down into CMF?
"PloneBatch" seems quite useful.
I do not use Plone (due to its GPL) but I found the "FactoryTool"
useful. Because it is GPL, I studied its functionality an
15 matches
Mail list logo
