[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-10-04 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sun Oct  3 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Oct  4 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (failures=3) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun Oct  3 21:54:31 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013610.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun Oct  3 21:48:31 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013607.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun Oct  3 21:50:31 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013608.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun Oct  3 21:52:31 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013609.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-10-04 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 04.10.2010, 13:58 Uhr, schrieb CMF Tests Summarizer  
:

> Subject: FAILED (failures=3) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
> From: CMF Tests
> Date: Sun Oct  3 21:54:31 EDT 2010
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013610.html

Me again: forgot to commit my updated status messages with the relevant  
tests. Fixed in #117214

Charlie
-- 
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-10-03 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 03.10.2010, 13:58 Uhr, schrieb CMF Tests Summarizer  
:

> Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=5) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12  
> Python-2.6.5 : Linux
> From: CMF Tests
> Date: Sat Oct  2 21:56:16 EDT 2010
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013606.html

Mine, of course, but now fixed.

Charlie
-- 
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-10-03 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sat Oct  2 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Sun Oct  3 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=5) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : 
Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Oct  2 21:56:16 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013606.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Oct  2 21:50:16 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013603.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Oct  2 21:52:16 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013604.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Oct  2 21:54:16 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013605.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-09-25 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 25.09.2010, 17:05 Uhr, schrieb Charlie Clark  
:

> Relates to two changes I made yesterday which should now be resolved, at
> least I can't reproduce them here.

ah, yuppie fixed things for me. Thanks!

Charlie
-- 
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-09-25 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 25.09.2010, 13:58 Uhr, schrieb CMF Tests Summarizer  
:

> Subject: FAILED (errors=3) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
> From: CMF Tests
> Date: Fri Sep 24 21:54:46 EDT 2010
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-September/013574.html

Relates to two changes I made yesterday which should now be resolved, at  
least I can't reproduce them here.

Charlie
-- 
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-09-25 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Fri Sep 24 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Sat Sep 25 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (errors=3) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Fri Sep 24 21:54:46 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-September/013574.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Fri Sep 24 21:48:46 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-September/013571.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Fri Sep 24 21:50:46 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-September/013572.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Fri Sep 24 21:52:46 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-September/013573.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-06-27 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 27.06.2010, 13:58 Uhr, schrieb CMF Tests Summarizer  
:

> Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
> From: CMF Tests
> Date: Sat Jun 26 21:52:14 EDT 2010
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013216.html

My fault - wrong permssion on @@logged_out.html

As with my other mails from yesterday this test was not failing locally.

Charlie
-- 
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-06-27 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sat Jun 26 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Sun Jun 27 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Jun 26 21:52:14 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013216.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Jun 26 21:46:14 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013213.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Jun 26 21:48:14 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013214.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Jun 26 21:50:14 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013215.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed, 1 Unknown

2010-06-06 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sat Jun  5 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Sun Jun  6 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Jun  5 21:47:38 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013117.html


Unknown
---

Subject: UNKNOWN : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Jun  5 21:51:38 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013119.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Jun  5 21:43:38 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013115.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Jun  5 21:45:38 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013116.html

Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Jun  5 21:49:38 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013118.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-04-01 Thread yuppie
Hi!


Tres Seaver wrote:
> I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in
> these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to
> keep them?

I don't use the 'instance' part. For manual testing I prefer using 
mkzopeinstance.

The 'i18n*' parts provide an easy way to create .pot files for CMF.

Maybe we should not run those parts by default. Either by removing them 
from parts= of the [buildout] section or by moving them to a separate 
.cfg file.


Cheers,

 Yuppie
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 31.03.2010, 22:07 Uhr, schrieb Tres Seaver :

>> The "instance" part is a pure convenience to quickly fire up an instance
>> if I need to look at something in the ZMI while doing development. If
>> there's no pressing reason to remove it I'd really like to keep it.
> I can see leaving that alone for the trunk-on-trunk buildout:  do you
> need it for the buildouts used to test against other Zope versions?
> The extra clutter and build time seems untidy to me.

Nice to see there is life on this list! :-D

If Jens is using it as I understand it, it's for when developing against  
trunk. This maybe less of an issue at the moment than it was while CMF 2.2  
was in development but still helpful. But, as you say, this is for  
trunk-on-trunk work.

Charlie
-- 
Charlie Clark
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-938-5360
GSM: +49-178-782-6226
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 3/31/10 22:07 , Tres Seaver wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> On 3/31/10 20:33 , Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in
>>> these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to
>>> keep them?
>> The "instance" part is a pure convenience to quickly fire up an instance
>> if I need to look at something in the ZMI while doing development. If
>> there's no pressing reason to remove it I'd really like to keep it.
> 
> I can see leaving that alone for the trunk-on-trunk buildout:  do you
> need it for the buildouts used to test against other Zope versions?
> The extra clutter and build time seems untidy to me.

I'm surprised that you want to remove it. I use it for all buildout
combinations. How do you start an instance while doing work on CMF
proper? Or do you never need any ZMI access or test portal instances? Do
you manually create a separate buildout extending CMF.buildout? IMHO
that would be a needless obstancle as opposed to keeping the "instance"
part.

jens

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuzsGoACgkQRAx5nvEhZLJSDQCfV6Gue1BBSzQwrj0qd41ecAJ3
1pkAoKzOzmnYUxX6D6h6HnvFYahnVm+6
=3lsZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> On 3/31/10 20:33 , Tres Seaver wrote:
>> I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in
>> these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to
>> keep them?
> 
> The "instance" part is a pure convenience to quickly fire up an instance
> if I need to look at something in the ZMI while doing development. If
> there's no pressing reason to remove it I'd really like to keep it.

I can see leaving that alone for the trunk-on-trunk buildout:  do you
need it for the buildouts used to test against other Zope versions?
The extra clutter and build time seems untidy to me.


Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkuzq4QACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ5RjACgrtFddsSOiSc3Kam9sSRYt09V
J4QAoM6tUIpfiW5tsbWDGvaEy1c0Bevm
=IKyY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 3/31/10 20:33 , Tres Seaver wrote:
> I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in
> these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to
> keep them?

The "instance" part is a pure convenience to quickly fire up an instance
if I need to look at something in the ZMI while doing development. If
there's no pressing reason to remove it I'd really like to keep it.

jens

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuzpC8ACgkQRAx5nvEhZLIQqgCbBHzB46qtTkc+MUpK0Wu8OoOM
mM0Anjpp3i/yfLNEeLJoNmkq2R1KZ9Kp
=RF/w
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Tres Seaver  wrote:
> OK, the change I'm planning on the trunk essentially reverts your last
> commit (all the extra version pins to make the 'test-zope212' part
> build), plus deleting the test-zope212 part (see attached patch).

Sure. That wasn't much more than a band-aid.

> BTW, I think the other test buildouts which do not run aganst the Zope2
> trunk should probably also be adjusted to use released Zope 2.12.x eggs
> as well:  we aren't co-developing the Zope 2.12 branch along with CMF
> 2.2 (any more, at least).

Well, it is nice to catch problems introduced in Zope 2 on the day
after they are made. And not when someone tries to update the buildout
to a new version at some later point. The risk is much lower for
stable branches, but it still exists.

As seen from todays test failures, they nicely showed how I screwed
some things up a bit too much on Zope trunk :)

> I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in
> these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to
> keep them?

Yvo has to comment this. I think he sometimes rebuilds the pot files
in CMF with the i18n part. Not sure about the instance.

Hanno
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> 2010/3/31 Tres Seaver :
>> I believe the root of this problem is that the 'index' and 'versions'
>> bits of a buildout.cfg are effectively Highlanders ("there can only be
>> one").  I gave up on trying to get the "two, two, two Zopes in one"
>> buildout to work, and instead created a separate buildout.cfg for
>> running CMF's tests against Zope 2.12.3.
> 
> Yeah, that sounds sensible. The extra test part with an index was a
> hack in the first place.
> 
>> Unless somebody objects violently, I plan to check the attached config
>> in on a branch of the main CMF buildout, and rip out the stuff which
>> tries to do both from the trunk version.  This change will require
>> Stefan's nightly runner to be adjusted, so I'm CC'ing him.
> 
> Looks all good, except for this first line of comment, which should be
> CMF trunk + Zope 2.12 :)
> 
>> # CMF trunk + Zope trunk
> 
> Personally I prefer versions.cfg files, so we could use an:
> 
> extends = http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.3/versions.cfg
> 
> instead of the index = line. But I don't care much for this specific
> test buildout.

OK, the change I'm planning on the trunk essentially reverts your last
commit (all the extra version pins to make the 'test-zope212' part
build), plus deleting the test-zope212 part (see attached patch).

BTW, I think the other test buildouts which do not run aganst the Zope2
trunk should probably also be adjusted to use released Zope 2.12.x eggs
as well:  we aren't co-developing the Zope 2.12 branch along with CMF
2.2 (any more, at least).

I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in
these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to
keep them?



Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkuzlXcACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6GtgCePELI/PiWKI71CESkmn6ybLou
YFgAoJHrg5d2A4wTIsc1jeh8UjUqCqOD
=N8Fu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Index: buildout.cfg
===
--- buildout.cfg	(revision 110373)
+++ buildout.cfg	(working copy)
@@ -1,15 +1,12 @@
 # CMF trunk + Zope trunk
 
 [buildout]
-extensions = buildout.dumppickedversions
-
 extends = src/Zope2/versions.cfg
 parts =
 zope2
 instance
 zopepy
 test
-test-zope212
 i18n-cmfcalendar
 i18n-cmfdefault
 eggs =
@@ -34,39 +31,10 @@
 src/five.localsitemanager
 
 [versions]
-# Override of a Zope2 trunk version pin
-zope.sendmail = 3.5.1
-# CMF-only dependencies
 five.formlib = 1.0.2
-plone.recipe.zope2instance = 4.0a4
-z3c.recipe.i18n = 0.7.0
-zope.authentication = 3.7.0
-zope.cachedescriptors = 3.5.0
-zope.componentvocabulary = 1.0
-zope.copy = 3.5.0
-zope.copypastemove = 3.5.2
-zope.deprecation = 3.4.0
-zope.dublincore = 3.4.3
-zope.error = 3.6.0
+plone.recipe.zope2instance = 4.0a1
 zope.formlib = 3.10.0
-zope.hookable = 3.4.1
-zope.minmax = 1.1.1
-zope.password = 3.5.1
-zope.session = 3.9.2
-zope.app.applicationcontrol = 3.5.0
-zope.app.appsetup = 3.11
-zope.app.component = 3.8.3
-zope.app.container = 3.8.0
-zope.app.debug = 3.4.1
-zope.app.dependable = 3.4.0
 zope.app.form = 3.12.1
-zope.app.locales = 3.5.1
-zope.app.pagetemplate = 3.7.1
-zope.app.publication = 3.7.0
-zope.app.publisher = 3.8.3
-zope.app.schema = 3.5.0
-zope.app.testing = 3.6.2
-zLOG = 2.11.1
 
 [zope2]
 recipe = zc.recipe.egg
@@ -91,14 +59,6 @@
 eggs = ${buildout:eggs}
 defaults = ['--module', '^Products[.](CMF|DC|GenericSetup)|^five[.]']
 
-[test-zope212]
-recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner
-index = http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.3/
-eggs =
-Zope2 == 2.12.3
-${buildout:eggs}
-defaults = ['--module', '^Products[.](CMF|DC|GenericSetup)|^five[.]']
-
 [i18n-cmfcalendar]
 recipe = z3c.recipe.i18n:i18n
 eggs =
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Hanno Schlichting
2010/3/31 Tres Seaver :
> I believe the root of this problem is that the 'index' and 'versions'
> bits of a buildout.cfg are effectively Highlanders ("there can only be
> one").  I gave up on trying to get the "two, two, two Zopes in one"
> buildout to work, and instead created a separate buildout.cfg for
> running CMF's tests against Zope 2.12.3.

Yeah, that sounds sensible. The extra test part with an index was a
hack in the first place.

> Unless somebody objects violently, I plan to check the attached config
> in on a branch of the main CMF buildout, and rip out the stuff which
> tries to do both from the trunk version.  This change will require
> Stefan's nightly runner to be adjusted, so I'm CC'ing him.

Looks all good, except for this first line of comment, which should be
CMF trunk + Zope 2.12 :)

> # CMF trunk + Zope trunk

Personally I prefer versions.cfg files, so we could use an:

extends = http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.3/versions.cfg

instead of the index = line. But I don't care much for this specific
test buildout.

> [buildout]
> parts =
>    zopepy
>    test
> eggs =
>    Zope2
>    Products.CMFCalendar
>    Products.CMFCore [test]
>    Products.CMFDefault
>    Products.CMFTopic
>    Products.CMFUid
>    Products.DCWorkflow
>    Products.GenericSetup
>    five.localsitemanager
> develop =
>    src/Products.CMFCalendar
>    src/Products.CMFCore
>    src/Products.CMFDefault
>    src/Products.CMFTopic
>    src/Products.CMFUid
>    src/Products.DCWorkflow
>    src/Products.GenericSetup
>    src/five.localsitemanager
> index = http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.3
>
> [versions]
> # CMF-only dependencies
> five.formlib = 1.0.2
>
> [zopepy]
> recipe = zc.recipe.egg
> eggs = ${buildout:eggs}
> interpreter = zopepy
> scripts = zopepy
>
> [test]
> recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner
> eggs = ${buildout:eggs}
> defaults = ['--module', '^Products[.](CMF|DC|GenericSetup)|^five[.]']
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Tres Seaver wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> Hi Tres,
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Tres Seaver  wrote:
>>> I can't even get the trunk buildout to build this morning:  Hanno, do
>>> you have any clue what is going on here?
>>>
>>>  The version, 3.7.1, is not consistent with the requirement, \
>>>   'zope.sendmail<3.7.0'.
>>>  While:
>>>   Installing test-zope212.
>>>  Error: Bad version 3.7.1
>> I added lots of version pins for all unpinned packages to the
>> buildout. I guess some of those loose ends suddenly became
>> problematic. I'm not sure which one exactly caused this, though.
> 
> This is a problem with trying to run both the Zope-trunk tests and the
> Zope-2.12 tests in the same buildout:  we should ideally be able to have
> *both* zope.sendmail versions in the 'eggs' directory, with the
> "correct" one for each testrunner configured somehow.  I don't think the
> testrunner recipe is clever enough for this usage, though.
> 
>> After my change the buildout runs at least. Judging from your commits,
>> you are working on the test failures. I'll leave you to it for a while
>> :) I was planning to look at them later today.
> 
> I've squished them all, I think, running against the trunk.  There are
> still a bunch of errors / failures running under 2.12.3, though, which I
> can't figure out.

I believe the root of this problem is that the 'index' and 'versions'
bits of a buildout.cfg are effectively Highlanders ("there can only be
one").  I gave up on trying to get the "two, two, two Zopes in one"
buildout to work, and instead created a separate buildout.cfg for
running CMF's tests against Zope 2.12.3.

Unless somebody objects violently, I plan to check the attached config
in on a branch of the main CMF buildout, and rip out the stuff which
tries to do both from the trunk version.  This change will require
Stefan's nightly runner to be adjusted, so I'm CC'ing him.


Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkuzjjUACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6cVACg1RC0QGs2TYfJTuKprgGIsox2
RAEAoJ8Qokke0sN2W+ir3lkT3z7ksNAS
=WlVc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
# CMF trunk + Zope trunk

[buildout]
parts =
zopepy
test
eggs =
Zope2
Products.CMFCalendar
Products.CMFCore [test]
Products.CMFDefault
Products.CMFTopic
Products.CMFUid
Products.DCWorkflow
Products.GenericSetup
five.localsitemanager
develop =
src/Products.CMFCalendar
src/Products.CMFCore
src/Products.CMFDefault
src/Products.CMFTopic
src/Products.CMFUid
src/Products.DCWorkflow
src/Products.GenericSetup
src/five.localsitemanager
index = http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.3

[versions]
# CMF-only dependencies
five.formlib = 1.0.2

[zopepy]
recipe = zc.recipe.egg
eggs = ${buildout:eggs}
interpreter = zopepy
scripts = zopepy

[test]
recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner
eggs = ${buildout:eggs}
defaults = ['--module', '^Products[.](CMF|DC|GenericSetup)|^five[.]']
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Hi Tres,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Tres Seaver  wrote:
>> I can't even get the trunk buildout to build this morning:  Hanno, do
>> you have any clue what is going on here?
>>
>>  The version, 3.7.1, is not consistent with the requirement, \
>>   'zope.sendmail<3.7.0'.
>>  While:
>>   Installing test-zope212.
>>  Error: Bad version 3.7.1
> 
> I added lots of version pins for all unpinned packages to the
> buildout. I guess some of those loose ends suddenly became
> problematic. I'm not sure which one exactly caused this, though.

This is a problem with trying to run both the Zope-trunk tests and the
Zope-2.12 tests in the same buildout:  we should ideally be able to have
*both* zope.sendmail versions in the 'eggs' directory, with the
"correct" one for each testrunner configured somehow.  I don't think the
testrunner recipe is clever enough for this usage, though.

> After my change the buildout runs at least. Judging from your commits,
> you are working on the test failures. I'll leave you to it for a while
> :) I was planning to look at them later today.

I've squished them all, I think, running against the trunk.  There are
still a bunch of errors / failures running under 2.12.3, though, which I
can't figure out.


Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkuzfl4ACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7hLQCg2uKF+wmK8LZ8IDrkbR86vM81
vD0AoKMBNtV5AHVrUrKxAYF0JN1Sd6r7
=1a7y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

CMF Tests Summarizer wrote:

> Test failures
> -
> 
> Subject: FAILED (errors=13) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux
> From: CMF Tests
> Date: Tue Mar 30 21:52:10 EDT 2010
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012790.html

I can't even get the trunk buildout to build this morning:  Hanno, do
you have any clue what is going on here?

 $ svn co svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/CMF.buildout/trunk
 ...
 $ cd trunk
 $ /path/to/python2.6 bootstrap/bootstrap.py
 ...
 $ bin/buildout
 ...
 Installing test-zope212.
 Getting distribution for 'Zope2==2.12.3'.
 ...
 Got Zope2 2.12.3.
 Getting distribution for 'zope.app.schema'.
 Got zope.app.schema 3.5.0.
 Getting distribution for 'zope.app.publisher'.
 Got zope.app.publisher 3.8.3.
 The version, 3.7.1, is not consistent with the requirement, \
   'zope.sendmail<3.7.0'.
 While:
   Installing test-zope212.
 Error: Bad version 3.7.1

The 'test-zope212' part uses the following section:

 [test-zope212]
 recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner
 index = http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.3/
 eggs =
 Zope2 == 2.12.3
 ${buildout:eggs}
 defaults = ['--module', '^Products[.](CMF|DC|GenericSetup)|^five[.]']

Adding 'zope.sendmail<3.7.0' to the eggs list doesn't help here.



Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkuzZAkACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7v2QCfQe0zU3OpBt6CUX2724APnrfP
YLIAnAzO6N4CYxsgFBr/w0kvIAxpp2Ma
=z80S
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Tue Mar 30 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Wed Mar 31 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (errors=13) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Mar 30 21:52:10 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012790.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Mar 30 21:46:10 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012787.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Mar 30 21:48:10 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012788.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Mar 30 21:50:10 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012789.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-30 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Mon Mar 29 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue Mar 30 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon Mar 29 21:52:38 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012786.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon Mar 29 21:46:38 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012783.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon Mar 29 21:48:38 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012784.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon Mar 29 21:50:38 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012785.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-29 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sun Mar 28 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Mar 29 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun Mar 28 21:53:18 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012782.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun Mar 28 21:47:18 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012779.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun Mar 28 21:49:18 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012780.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun Mar 28 21:51:18 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-March/012781.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-02-23 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Mon Feb 22 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue Feb 23 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon Feb 22 21:00:55 EST 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-February/012650.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon Feb 22 20:54:55 EST 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-February/012647.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon Feb 22 20:56:55 EST 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-February/012648.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon Feb 22 20:58:55 EST 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-February/012649.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2009-09-11 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Thu Sep 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Sep 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.2 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Thu Sep 10 21:11:12 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-September/011987.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Thu Sep 10 21:07:12 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-September/011985.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Thu Sep 10 21:09:12 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-September/011986.html

Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.2 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Thu Sep 10 21:13:12 EDT 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-September/011988.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests