From: Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does machine mean? The host running the ZEO server? The host
running the ZEO client? What about those of us who run multiple ZEO
clients
on the same machine (multi-cpu, test instances, whatever)...
I think it should show the site name, ie,
Lennart Regebro wrote:
From: Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does machine mean? The host running the ZEO server? The host
running the ZEO client? What about those of us who run multiple ZEO
clients
on the same machine (multi-cpu, test instances, whatever)...
I think it should
Steve Alexander wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
I think it should show the site name, ie, www.torped.se:1006, or
intranet.torped.se:8080, and so on.
That would make me know where I was editing all the tim (except when
I have
SiteRoots. I loathe the littl buggers. Grrr). :-)
It is a great
There's a couple good starting points for looking at this stuff...
http://www.alistapart.com/stories/fear4/
http://www.alistapart.com/stories/dao/
From: Jeff Kowalczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 16:12:44 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Zope-dev] ZMI: IE6 TextArea width
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Are you planning to up the python version to 2.2? Because in that case I'd
be happy to put in Authentication support in MailHost. Smtplib.py in 2.1.2
doesn't support authentication.
I don't know how people are currently using Zope with 2.2. There is
probably some
In my own casual experimentation, Zope worked okay by itself on Mandrake
Linux 8.2b4 with Python 2.2, but ZEO refused to work.
For what it's worth.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: Matt Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Are you planning to up the python version to
Just a heads up, for people who're not sure:
None of the Linux binary downloads of Zope I've tested (including
2.5.1b1) are built with Large File Support in python. Also unstable
Debian's python is without Large File Support, same thing with Mandrake
8.1.
If you want to check for yourself your
Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are trying to get to the bottom of a few straggling
instability reports, so we're planning to go ahead with
I started with 2.5.1b1 today and have problems with our one central
index_html approach.
That would be really
Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can't reproduce this myself. Are you using DTML, PageTemplates,
something else?
I tried with 2.5.0 also and had the same effect. I assume there is
some Product interference - I will try to eliminate the one.
Maybe it's a patched version of ZSyncer.
The machine should, in my opinion, be the domain you are logged in on. I.e,
if you are authenticated for domain www.foobar.com:1001, thats what it
should say, according to an internal survey here at Torped (that means me
and Johan). :-)
It would be nice to have it configurable, but I'm not sure
I don't know how people are currently using Zope with 2.2.
Well, I guess I could make a check for the Zope version, so not to tie up
Zope 2.6 to Python 2.2.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
I get this message when starting Zope 2.5.1b1 on Windows 98:
2002-03-18T19:32:15 INFO(0) z2 Your umask of 000 may be too permissive; for
the
security of your Zope data, it is recommended you use 077
That's rather silly on Windows 98. :-)
A couple of questions:
- Should that really be 077? That
http://collector.zope.org/Zope/30
What are people take on empty dates? Today I can find no way to enter empty
dates (I think None worked before, but it doesn't work in 2.5.1b1 anyway).
This is a problem, because we need to be able to have empty dates. Also,
enetering something magick (like
Frank Tegtmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for taking the time for a check.
I completely made a fool of myself - I was falling into the
DTML-Document/DTML-method trap.
The central index_html was created as DTML document ..
Sorry for stealing your time.
Regards, Frank
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 13:21, Lennart Regebro wrote:
The machine should, in my opinion, be the domain you are logged in on. I.e,
if you are authenticated for domain www.foobar.com:1001, thats what it
should say, according to an internal survey here at Torped (that means me
and Johan). :-)
http://collector.zope.org/Zope/30
What are people take on empty dates?
snip
This is a problem, because we need to be able to have empty dates. Also,
enetering something magick (like None, or 1980/0/0 isn't usable.
We fix this
with this simple patch, which so far has caused us no
Lennart Regebro wrote:
I get this message when starting Zope 2.5.1b1 on Windows 98:
No you didn't, you got it on the trunk. I just double-checked. My big
security patch was never checked in on the 2.5 branch.
2002-03-18T19:32:15 INFO(0) z2 Your umask of 000 may be too permissive; for
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a full collection of wholesale freight rate calculators at
http://www.apx-air-cargo.com
Our new calculator is here and it will calculate rates from Asia to over 30 US
cities including customs clearance and delivery.
Great! Is it available as a Product?
Jeff Kowalczyk writes:
Jabber, IMAP and LDAP are the ones that come to mind immediately, since
you'd be that much closer to having Zope fulfill a role that MS Exchange
really doesn't; inexpensive, easily maintained groupware for small
organizations that need custom workflow app
From: Behrens Matt - Grand Rapids [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Second, you are confusing umasks with modes. When you create a file on
UNIX its modes are 0666 umask, directory 0777 umask.
Oh, yeah, right...
Yes, but it's not silly to check for os.name == 'posix', which I will
fix on my own time
From: Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I propose that we could add a new field type with a name
like optional_date. The converter handler for that type could
handle an empty field in whatever way we feel is reasonable,
without breaking existing applications. (Let the fight over
reasonable
I've applied both patches, however I've changed the incref part a
little. Now it reads:
#define Py_INCREF(op) ((op)-ob_refcnt 0 ? (op)-ob_refcnt++ :
fprintf(stderr,Eeek! Increfing an object from refct 0 at
%s:%d\n,__FILE__,__LINE__), (op)-ob_refcnt++)
It's all in one line if my MUA wrapped it.
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 17:44, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
I've applied both patches, however I've changed the incref part a
little. Now it reads:
#define Py_INCREF(op) ((op)-ob_refcnt 0 ? (op)-ob_refcnt++ :
fprintf(stderr,Eeek! Increfing an object from refct 0 at
I propose that we could add a new field type with a name
like optional_date. The converter handler for that type could
handle an empty field in whatever way we feel is reasonable,
without breaking existing applications. (Let the fight over
reasonable begin! :^)
That's fine by me. And
24 matches
Mail list logo
