Hi,
I have the latest PageTemplates, ZTUtils, and TAL installed on Zope 2.4.3
with python 2.1.1 on Linux.
Whenever I try to create or edit a PageTemplate using IE5.5 or IE6 on
windows I get the following error. It works fine however when I use
Netscape or Mozilla on windows or linux.
I have
I wasn't aware of that effort, thanks for pointing it out. I was only
tinkering so of course that project is a much more complete solution
than what I was envisioning.
Went through problems.txt and more rapidly throught the specs, and I
liked what I saw. There is a formal statement on the hand
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How extensively is STX actually used? I've been looking at it myself
> recently, and the whole system seem rather simplistic to me in how it
> parses the text. I'm talking specifically of the STX version currently
> standard in Zope 2.5 (and 2
How extensively is STX actually used? I've been looking at it myself
recently, and the whole system seem rather simplistic to me in how it
parses the text. I'm talking specifically of the STX version currently
standard in Zope 2.5 (and 2.4 I think), which I believe is STXNG; I
haven't gone back t
From: "Florent Guillaume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Then it's simply :-) a matter of user interface. There's also the
> question of what permissions are needed to modify a workgroup of course.
>
> Does this match what you want ?
Yeah, I think so.
> Looks quite feasible to me, and I think it can be d
Hi all,
As talked about last week, I've updated the proposed features
document for Zope 2.6:
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/Zope2.6/ProposedFeatures
...to cut out those proposals without volunteers. Now comes
the hard part :^)
There are quite a few proposals there. The current li
Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With workgroups you create ten workgroups. Within each workgrup you assign
> users to their respective roles. You then add the workgroups to the correct
> places in the hierarchy. It also opens for the possibility to assign
> workgroup managers that can
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 07:01:13PM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> From: "Jim Penny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I now have two kinds of administrators, and two kinds of users.
>
> An interesting case. If I understand it correctly, with our workgroups
> scheme,the restricted administrators would h
From: "Florent Guillaume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No no no ! With NUG the Roles added to a group are still added at the
> local role level, which means that the 'bosses' group only has a Boss
> role where you want it.
Yes, of course. But what I was aiming at is that all the Bosses have Boss
right a
de ZORZI Frederic wrote:
> Hello zopers, I'm writing a product with a relational database mapping.
> When I launch loading procedures, the product creates ~ 5 instances.
> I regulary do a get_transaction().commit(), but memory still increase
> constantly (more than 300 megs for python proces
I'm trying to wrap my mind around what you call workgroups.
By the way, have you reviewed the use cases for workgroups that I put in
http://www.zope.org/Members/nuxeo/Products/NuxUserGroups/README.txt ?
Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> With normal grouping, you typically have on
From: "Jim Penny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I now have two kinds of administrators, and two kinds of users.
An interesting case. If I understand it correctly, with our workgroups
scheme,the restricted administrators would have administration rights on a
workgroup. They would then be able to create u
Hello zopers, I'm writing a product with a relational database mapping.
When I launch loading procedures, the product creates ~ 5 instances.
I regulary do a get_transaction().commit(), but memory still increase
constantly (more than 300 megs for python processes)
How can I flush memory ?
T
Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I needed a generalization of this scheme (and so ended up writing my own
> User Folder).
>
> We manufacture parts which are controlled by second parties, but bought
> primarily by third parties. I will call these parties Manufacturer,
> Brand Owners
Brian Lloyd wrote:
>
...
> I can easily imagine that "right" behavior of a link if
> your main goal is to avoid 404s will _not_ be right if
> you are using the link in other ways. For example, if you
> went to a URL that had been moved, what is the right
> "context" that it should render itself
15 matches
Mail list logo