[Zope-dev] Re: Zope-Dev -- confirmation of subscription -- request 616673

2002-11-27 Thread Phil Harris
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 05:54:27 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zope-Dev -- confirmation of subscription -- request 616673 We have received a request from 193.63.123.17 for subscription of your email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. To confirm the request,

[Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread seb bacon
The DateTime bug in 2.6.0 breaks all of my sites. This must be true for very many other people. If we collectively want use of Zope to multiply 10x, I don't think it's a great idea to let a major bug like that stay in the latest-and-greatest release. Can we have a bugfix release? seb

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Andreas Jung
Someone posted already a fix for this problem. It should not be hard to fix this single problem by exchanging the DateTime.py file on your sites -aj --On Mittwoch, 27. November 2002 11:18 + seb bacon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The DateTime bug in 2.6.0 breaks all of my sites. This must be

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Magnus Heino
Someone posted already a fix for this problem. It should not be hard to fix this single problem by exchanging the DateTime.py file on your sites That really doesn't matter. The official release on http://www.zope.org/Products still has the bug. -- /Magnus

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Chris Withers
Andreas Jung wrote: Someone posted already a fix for this problem. It should not be hard to fix this single problem by exchanging the DateTime.py file on your sites I'll echo my earlier comment: Whatever happened to release early, release often? Why is this not happening with Zope? cheers,

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Lennart Regebro
From: Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] Someone posted already a fix for this problem. It should not be hard to fix this single problem by exchanging the DateTime.py file on your sites Yep, it's on http://www.zope.org/Members/regebro/ somewhere. But I agree that it's time for a bugfix release

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Guido van Rossum
Someone posted already a fix for this problem. It should not be hard to fix this single problem by exchanging the DateTime.py file on your sites I'll echo my earlier comment: Whatever happened to release early, release often? Why is this not happening with Zope? Because it doesn't

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Chris Withers
Guido van Rossum wrote: Why is this not happening with Zope? Because it doesn't apply. Release early, release often is for bleeding edge developers. Says who? I thought the idea behind it was to get the releases out early, so you can find the bugs faster and get the releases more stable

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Guido van Rossum
Says who? I thought the idea behind it was to get the releases out early, so you can find the bugs faster and get the releases more stable more quickly... I guess what I'm saying is that for a version 2.x.y, x should behave as you describe while y should go up as often as a bug is

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Wolfgang Strobl
On 27 Nov 2002, 11:18 seb bacon wrote: Can we have a bugfix release? Me too. I'd like to get the fix for Issue 597 (http://collector.zope.org/Zope/597) in such a bugfix release. ZCTextIndex, quite different from the old TextIndex, currently is almost unusuable outside the US, because it

RE: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Brian Lloyd
From: Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] Someone posted already a fix for this problem. It should not be hard to fix this single problem by exchanging the DateTime.py file on your sites Yep, it's on http://www.zope.org/Members/regebro/ somewhere. But I agree that it's time for a bugfix

[Zope-dev] KeywordIndex errors

2002-11-27 Thread Chris Withers
Hi, started seeing quite a few of these showing up in one of our server's logs: -- 2002-11-27T16:16:26 ERROR(200) KeywordIndex unindex_object could not remove documentId -869933785 from index companies. This should not happen. exceptions.KeyError: -869933785 This is Zope 2.6.0, hence the

Re: [Zope-dev] KeywordIndex errors

2002-11-27 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Mittwoch, 27. November 2002 18:08 + Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, started seeing quite a few of these showing up in one of our server's logs: -- 2002-11-27T16:16:26 ERROR(200) KeywordIndex unindex_object could not remove documentId -869933785 from index companies.

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Chris McDonough
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 12:31, Wolfgang Strobl wrote: On 27 Nov 2002, 11:18 seb bacon wrote: Can we have a bugfix release? Me too. I'd like to get the fix for Issue 597 (http://collector.zope.org/Zope/597) in such a bugfix release. ZCTextIndex, quite different from the old TextIndex,

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Magnus Heino
I guess what I'm saying is that for a version 2.x.y, x should behave as you describe while y should go up as often as a bug is discovered and fixed... That means we either waste a lot more time doing releases, or the releases become a lot more shoddy, hardly more than a snapshot from

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Mittwoch, 27. November 2002 13:17 -0500 Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 12:31, Wolfgang Strobl wrote: On 27 Nov 2002, 11:18 seb bacon wrote: Can we have a bugfix release? Me too. I'd like to get the fix for Issue 597 (http://collector.zope.org/Zope/597)

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Casey Duncan
I am assigned to fix this. I will make time to do it over the holiday. Time has been extremely short for me (and basically all of us at ZC) lately, so your patience is appreciated. I'm assuming we will not have bug day before 2.6.1, but perhaps one shortly thereafter is in order? -Casey On

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugfix release?

2002-11-27 Thread Lennart Regebro
From: Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sometimes going through the CVS logs for the module in which the bug is in, you can tell who has most recently been involved in that code and send them an email about the bug. Heh. Never worked for me. Ah well, now I can fix things myself instead. :-)

Re: [Zope-dev] KeywordIndex errors

2002-11-27 Thread Myroslav Opyr
Andreas Jung wrote: --On Mittwoch, 27. November 2002 18:08 + Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, started seeing quite a few of these showing up in one of our server's logs: -- 2002-11-27T16:16:26 ERROR(200) KeywordIndex unindex_object could not remove documentId -869933785

Re: [Zope-dev] KeywordIndex errors

2002-11-27 Thread Wolfram Kerber
This usually happens when there are duplicates in the indexed keywords and the record isn't updated before unindexing. Shouldn't cause any problems, though it isn't nice. This can be easily fixed by changing the KeywordIndex' index_object method to make keywords unique before indexing. -

[Zope-dev] Zope 2.6.0 ZMI Problem for CJK(Collector 623) patch.

2002-11-27 Thread Hajime Nakagami
Hi ! Zope 2.6.0 have a problem for non 'iso-8859-1' user. And Collector 623 is still incollect now. http://collector.zope.org/Zope/623 It's serious problem for CJK(I'm Japanese). So I make patch for 2.6.0. http://www005.upp.so-net.ne.jp/zope260-i18n-20021123.diff 1.Install $ cd $(INST_HOME) $

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6.0 ZMI Problem for CJK(Collector 623) patch.

2002-11-27 Thread Hajime Nakagami
Sorry http://www005.upp.so-net.ne.jp/nakagami/zope260-i18n-20021123.diff http://www005.upp.so-net.ne.jp/zope260-i18n-20021123.diff ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML

Re: [Zope-dev] KeywordIndex errors

2002-11-27 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Donnerstag, 28. November 2002 01:48 +0100 Wolfram Kerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This usually happens when there are duplicates in the indexed keywords and the record isn't updated before unindexing. Shouldn't cause any problems, though it isn't nice. This can be easily fixed by changing