Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2004 16:01 Uhr -0500 Jim Fulton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2004 15:34 Uhr -0500 Jim Fulton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2004 20:30 Uhr +0100 Stefan
--On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 7:36 Uhr -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please explain why including all of docutils requires adjusting the paths.
I did that already in an earlier mail last week.
We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and don't adjust the paths. We *did*
adjust
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Freitag, 17. September 2004 11:58 Uhr -0300 Rodrigo Dias Arruda
Senra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I was lead to believe that 2.7.x was not feature frozen
due to the Zope 2.7.4 beta 1 - Features added ... section in
http://zope.org/Products/Zope/2.7.4b2/CHANGES.txt
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 7:36 Uhr -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please explain why including all of docutils requires adjusting the
paths.
I did that already in an earlier mail last week.
You may think you did.
We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and
Dennis Allison wrote:
I am a bit confused by the current state of the CVS repository. Where is
the current CVS for Zope 2.7.3+?
On the Zope-2_7-branch branch in the CVS repository.
What's the purpose of the markers saying
ATTENTION_THIS_AREA_IS_NOW_CLOSED.txt/1.1
Did you read the contents
--On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 9:48 Uhr -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
These are improvements of existing functionalies but not new features.
I consider improvements of existing functionality to be a new feature.
Third-dot releases should be only for bug fixes.
Then I call them new
[Jim Fulton]
We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and don't adjust the paths.
We *did*adjust docutils slightly.
[Andreas Jung]
No, Zope 3 ships only with the 'docutils' subdirectory of the
Docutils package.
[Jim]
What is it lacking?
I suppose it's the 'docs', 'extras', 'licenses' and
Tim Peters wrote:
...
Jim, while I personally don't care much, Zope3's repackaging of
docutils doesn't meet license requirements to retain the original
licenses in derivative works. Zope2's does, because it includes
docutil's whole 'licenses' subdirectory (except for the GPL).
At least as of the
[Tim Peters]
Jim, while I personally don't care much, Zope3's repackaging of
docutils doesn't meet license requirements to retain the original
licenses in derivative works. Zope2's does, because it includes
docutil's whole 'licenses' subdirectory (except for the GPL).
[Jim Fulton]
At least
--On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 11:08 Uhr -0500 Tim Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Jim Fulton]
We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and don't adjust the paths.
We *did*adjust docutils slightly.
[Andreas Jung]
No, Zope 3 ships only with the 'docutils' subdirectory of the
Docutils package.
[Jim]
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 11:08 Uhr -0500 Tim Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Jim Fulton]
We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and don't adjust the paths.
We *did*adjust docutils slightly.
[Andreas Jung]
No, Zope 3 ships only with the 'docutils' subdirectory of the
11 matches
Mail list logo