Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-20 Thread Jim Fulton
Andreas Jung wrote: --On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2004 16:01 Uhr -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: --On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2004 15:34 Uhr -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: --On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2004 20:30 Uhr +0100 Stefan

Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-20 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 7:36 Uhr -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please explain why including all of docutils requires adjusting the paths. I did that already in an earlier mail last week. We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and don't adjust the paths. We *did* adjust

Re: [Zope-dev] Is Zope.2.7.4 feature frozen ?

2004-12-20 Thread Jim Fulton
Andreas Jung wrote: --On Freitag, 17. September 2004 11:58 Uhr -0300 Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I was lead to believe that 2.7.x was not feature frozen due to the Zope 2.7.4 beta 1 - Features added ... section in http://zope.org/Products/Zope/2.7.4b2/CHANGES.txt

Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-20 Thread Jim Fulton
Andreas Jung wrote: --On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 7:36 Uhr -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please explain why including all of docutils requires adjusting the paths. I did that already in an earlier mail last week. You may think you did. We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and

[Zope-dev] Re: cvs for Zope 2.7.X

2004-12-20 Thread Jim Fulton
Dennis Allison wrote: I am a bit confused by the current state of the CVS repository. Where is the current CVS for Zope 2.7.3+? On the Zope-2_7-branch branch in the CVS repository. What's the purpose of the markers saying ATTENTION_THIS_AREA_IS_NOW_CLOSED.txt/1.1 Did you read the contents

Re: [Zope-dev] Is Zope.2.7.4 feature frozen ?

2004-12-20 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 9:48 Uhr -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are improvements of existing functionalies but not new features. I consider improvements of existing functionality to be a new feature. Third-dot releases should be only for bug fixes. Then I call them new

Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-20 Thread Tim Peters
[Jim Fulton] We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and don't adjust the paths. We *did*adjust docutils slightly. [Andreas Jung] No, Zope 3 ships only with the 'docutils' subdirectory of the Docutils package. [Jim] What is it lacking? I suppose it's the 'docs', 'extras', 'licenses' and

Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-20 Thread Jim Fulton
Tim Peters wrote: ... Jim, while I personally don't care much, Zope3's repackaging of docutils doesn't meet license requirements to retain the original licenses in derivative works. Zope2's does, because it includes docutil's whole 'licenses' subdirectory (except for the GPL). At least as of the

Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-20 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim Peters] Jim, while I personally don't care much, Zope3's repackaging of docutils doesn't meet license requirements to retain the original licenses in derivative works. Zope2's does, because it includes docutil's whole 'licenses' subdirectory (except for the GPL). [Jim Fulton] At least

Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-20 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 11:08 Uhr -0500 Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Jim Fulton] We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and don't adjust the paths. We *did*adjust docutils slightly. [Andreas Jung] No, Zope 3 ships only with the 'docutils' subdirectory of the Docutils package. [Jim]

Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-20 Thread Jim Fulton
Andreas Jung wrote: --On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 11:08 Uhr -0500 Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Jim Fulton] We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and don't adjust the paths. We *did*adjust docutils slightly. [Andreas Jung] No, Zope 3 ships only with the 'docutils' subdirectory of the