On Saturday 21 February 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> One (probably nice) solution that comes in my mind is to make the form
> somehow aware if it needs to re-update its actions and to provide a
> way for the action handler to signal about that. Probably, a simple
> boolean form instance variable w
On Saturday 21 February 2009, Roger Ineichen wrote:
> I fixed a z3c.form issue where util.Manager keys and values
> get append more then one time by calling update more then once
> on widgets or actions.
>
> For doing so, I implemented a UniqueOrderedKeys class for
> util.Manager._data_keys and a d
Hi Dan
> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.form update issues
>
> 2009/2/21 Dan Korostelev :
> > 2009/2/21 Roger Ineichen :
> >> we should carefully review this part and probably add
> action.update
> >> after action.execute. Right now, without looking at the
> code I think
> >> we do not update
2009/2/21 Dan Korostelev :
> 2009/2/21 Roger Ineichen :
>> we should carefully review this part and probably
>> add action.update after action.execute. Right now, without looking
>> at the code I think we do not update actions after execute. Which
>> could end in bad action handler setup because of
2009/2/21 Roger Ineichen :
> we should carefully review this part and probably
> add action.update after action.execute. Right now, without looking
> at the code I think we do not update actions after execute. Which
> could end in bad action handler setup because of skipped action
> condition handl
Hi Dan
> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.form update issues
>
> 2009/2/21 Roger Ineichen :
> > Hi all
> >
> > I fixed a z3c.form issue where util.Manager keys and values
> get append
> > more then one time by calling update more then once on widgets or
> > actions.
> >
> > For doing so, I implem
2009/2/21 Roger Ineichen :
> Hi all
>
> I fixed a z3c.form issue where util.Manager keys and values
> get append more then one time by calling update more then once
> on widgets or actions.
>
> For doing so, I implemented a UniqueOrderedKeys class for
> util.Manager._data_keys and a decorator which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert rottermann wrote:
> thanks a lot for the effort that has been put into the new zope documentation.
> I have a litte wish:
> the colors of the index (light green on whit) is uncomfortable to my eyes and
> hard to read.
> maybe this could be chang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
>>> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org.
>> Is this failure official or is there
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 14:11, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> IMHO, the way the Zope community is structured, it's very hard to get
> people to contribute this kind of thing. I hope things are different
> now. The work that happened with the Zope book is encouraging, for
> example. However, most people wh
Hi all
I fixed a z3c.form issue where util.Manager keys and values
get append more then one time by calling update more then once
on widgets or actions.
For doing so, I implemented a UniqueOrderedKeys class for
util.Manager._data_keys and a decorator which will prevent
to override them. See z3c.f
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 20:13, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
> For the time being Zope2 must be used as a develop egg. Like e.g. so:
> http://svn.zope.org/CMF.buildout/trunk/
>
I got it working without development egg:
[buildout]
parts =
instance
eggs =
some_project
zope2
# Re
thanks a lot for the effort that has been put into the new zope documentation.
I have a litte wish:
the colors of the index (light green on whit) is uncomfortable to my eyes and
hard to read.
maybe this could be changed to a more contrasting combination?
robert
Andreas Jung schrieb:
> -BEGIN PG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In preparation for the upcoming Zope 2.12 release we reorganized the
Zope 2 documentation:
- - all related documentation is now maintained a restructured text
document in SVN:
svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope2docs
- - The Zope Book, The Zo
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:59, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> We
>
> Yes. But not *I*. And you asked if *I* could get it done. :) Perhaps
> you meant if I could nag people into doing it. I doubt that I could.
> I'm not good at making people do things for free. :)
>
> I think th
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Feb 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Feb 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Feb 20 20:55:07 EST 2009
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:59, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> We
Yes. But not *I*. And you asked if *I* could get it done. :) Perhaps
you meant if I could nag people into doing it. I doubt that I could.
I'm not good at making people do things for free. :)
I think the way your formulated this is indicati
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote at 2009-2-19 13:06 -0500:
>I can adapt to any style
>and believe that the fine grain details should not be dogmatically
>enforced but rather allow for variations in such subjective preferences.
+1
--
Dieter
___
Zope-Dev mai
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Feb 21, 2009, at 08:55 , Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>> - - are there any legal issues with the design & layout in case we
>> want to
>> make modifications? I know that the designer of new.zope.org theme
>> made some tr
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:14, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Please go make this happen if you can. It's very important. I can't anymore.
>
> As far as I can see, it's a question of
> - setting up a server, I would recommend a Plone site with the new Zope theme.
We have this a
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:37, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> With the revolutionary eggification of the masses that is underway the
> dictatorship has ended. Zope 2.12 is a libertarian meritodemocracy.
Well, at least if you have svn access. :)
--
Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista.
htt
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:27, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> As I will make it with ZClasses, I will participate outside your circles.
> Thus, you may dictate and I fight your dictatorship
With the revolutionary eggification of the masses that is underway the
dictatorship has ended. Zope 2.12 is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.02.2009 11:27 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2009-2-16 20:43 +0100:
>> ...
>> On Feb 16, 2009, at 19:43 , Dieter Maurer wrote:
>>
>>> Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-2-16 19:20 +0100:
...
Please come off it. Either becom
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2009-2-16 20:43 +0100:
> ...
>On Feb 16, 2009, at 19:43 , Dieter Maurer wrote:
>
>> Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-2-16 19:20 +0100:
>>> ...
>>> Please come off it. Either become an active contributor and
>>> participate
>>> in our dictatorship
>>
>> I will never participate i
Am 21.02.2009 um 11:23 schrieb Michael Howitz:
> Log message for revision 96885:
> Using ``z3c.ptcompat`` instead of deprecated ``z3c.pt.compat``.
[...]
There are still test failures and I don't know how to fix them. Anyone?
File "/Users/mac/Documents/tmp/z3c.pagelet/src/z3c/pagelet/
README.txt
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-2-16 19:50 +0100:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On 16.02.2009 19:43 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-2-16 19:20 +0100:
>>> ...
>>> Please come off it. Either become an active contributor and participate
>>> in our dictatorship
>
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:14, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Please go make this happen if you can. It's very important. I can't anymore.
As far as I can see, it's a question of
- setting up a server, I would recommend a Plone site with the new Zope theme.
- creating a zodb.zope.org DNS record and point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 21, 2009, at 08:55 , Andreas Jung wrote:
> - - are there any legal issues with the design & layout in case we
> want to
> make modifications? I know that the designer of new.zope.org theme
> made some trouble when it came to discussion about
Andreas Jung wrote:
> I just checked new.zope.org and I think that your idea appears
> reasonable. The only thing I dislike about the new.zope.org design is
> the navigation tree at the bottom of the page. All other parts of the
> design could be re-used directly - perhaps with some slightly modif
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:14, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> The new.zope.org initiative died because no-one could write any content.
>> Even then 5-10 pages of content requires for a very basic microsite was
>> too much, and several separate calls for volunteers produced almost
30 matches
Mail list logo
