-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03.04.2009 21:02 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
*This* part needs some fixing, largely because Jim's role their is an
artifact of ZC's role, now lapsed, as custodians. At a minimum, there
should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> *This* part needs some fixing, largely because Jim's role their is an
>>> artifact of ZC's role, now lapsed, as custodians. At a minimum, there
>>> should be a group (I suggest the zope-web regulars) who
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2009, at 22:53 , Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> +1 to making svn-over-http read-only checkouts work.
>
> This is now working. The repository can be reached under...
>
>http://svn.zope.org/repos/main/
Jens, you're my hero :-)
Remind me that I owe you beer next tim
Tres Seaver wrote:
>> - the web front end is ancient and not as good as other options (Trac,
>> WebSVN)
>
> Fixing the web front-end should be a matter for the zope-web list.
The zope-web list is pretty dead...
>> So I thought I'd ask what the plans are now that the foundation owns all
>> the
Andreas Jung wrote:
>> *This* part needs some fixing, largely because Jim's role their is an
>> artifact of ZC's role, now lapsed, as custodians. At a minimum, there
>> should be a group (I suggest the zope-web regulars) who can take over
>> the maintenance of that application. A *different* gro
Christian Theune wrote:
>> See:
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.6_releasenotes.html#auth-related-improvements
>
> However, this only *allows* clients to manage their password reasonably,
> it doesn't force them to.
Well, you can't force someone to keep their private key private either...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.04.2009 22:53 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
> *This* part needs some fixing, largely because Jim's role their is an
> artifact of ZC's role, now lapsed, as custodians. At a minimum, there
> should be a group (I suggest the zope-web regulars) who c
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 20:43 +0200, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 20:39, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> > On Apr 2, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> >> For me, the ideal would be simply https for everything and using http
> >> basic auth for access with more people having access t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 2, 2009, at 22:53 , Tres Seaver wrote:
> +1 to making svn-over-http read-only checkouts work.
This is now working. The repository can be reached under...
http://svn.zope.org/repos/main/
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
First, this cross-post was inappropriate: it is a matter for general
discussion among Zope committers, which is not a matter for the
Foundation to act on unless / until some consensus for changing the
status quo emerges. This will be my last post to
Martijn Pieters schrieb:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 20:31, Chris Withers wrote:
>> For me, the ideal would be simply https for everything and using http
>> basic auth for access with more people having access to update the
>> passwd file and maybe Trac or WebSVN for a nice web interface.
>>
>> I vol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.04.2009 21:58 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> I have been told that there are mirrors of the Zope SVN repository
>> providing read access via "http".
>
> Shame none of them is advertised anywhere...
http://svn.zope.de
- -a
Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Possibly because I am using SVN 1.6.
>
> Then "never" means since 2009-03-20. Or else you have never done a
> checkout from a password-protected SVN-over-HTTP(S) server.
It's been encrypted on Windows for longer than that...
(svn 1.4...)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 02.04.2009 20:44 Uhr, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> On 02.04.2009 20:39 Uhr, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> On Apr 2, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
For me, the ideal would be simply https for everything and using http
basic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.04.2009 20:44 Uhr, Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 02.04.2009 20:39 Uhr, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Apr 2, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
>>> For me, the ideal would be simply https for everything and using http
>>> basic auth for access with more
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 20:39, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
>> For me, the ideal would be simply https for everything and using http
>> basic auth for access with more people having access to update the
>> passwd file and maybe Trac or WebSVN for a nice web
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 20:31, Chris Withers wrote:
> For me, the ideal would be simply https for everything and using http
> basic auth for access with more people having access to update the
> passwd file and maybe Trac or WebSVN for a nice web interface.
>
> I volunteer to help with any/all of t
17 matches
Mail list logo