Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-3-25 08:19 +0100:
> ...
>> I am very happy to read this...
>>
>
>I still have no idea why you are behind ZClasses?
It is nice to have an UI supported way to build applications.
ZClasses are in many cases easier than Python based product
development.
> ...
>ZClasses will
+1
I have handed systems with a thin ZClass layer on top to semi-
developers and they were *easily* able to take it from there. These
are people who would never have grokked (and bothered with) disk-
based Python development and all the mumbo-jumbo it entails.
No other system has anything e
--On 24. März 2006 21:05:49 +0100 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote at 2006-3-24 11:25 -0500:
On the subject of deprecation, for the record, I think removing
ZClasses is a mistake. They have legitimate uses. They have major
flaws too. It would help if we would mo
Jim Fulton wrote at 2006-3-24 11:25 -0500:
>
>On the subject of deprecation, for the record, I think removing
>ZClasses is a mistake. They have legitimate uses. They have major
>flaws too. It would help if we would more clearly document their
>limitations and pitfalls, rather than get rid of the
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 24. März 2006 12:03:42 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are lots of people who have good uses for ZClasses for
quick one-off projects. I've heard from some of them.
There are lots of people who use Zope who don't fit this
definition. I care a
--On 24. März 2006 12:03:42 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are lots of people who have good uses for ZClasses for
quick one-off projects. I've heard from some of them.
There are lots of people who use Zope who don't fit this
definition. I care about these people. :)
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 24. März 2006 11:25:53 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the subject of deprecation, for the record, I think removing
ZClasses is a mistake. They have legitimate uses. They have major
flaws too. It would help if we would more clearly document their
li
--On 24. März 2006 11:25:53 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the subject of deprecation, for the record, I think removing
ZClasses is a mistake. They have legitimate uses. They have major
flaws too. It would help if we would more clearly document their
limitations and pitfall
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 24. März 2006 11:25:53 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the subject of deprecation, for the record, I think removing
ZClasses is a mistake. They have legitimate uses.
I don't think that ZClasses have real use in the current Zope world
except for le
--On 24. März 2006 11:25:53 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the subject of deprecation, for the record, I think removing
ZClasses is a mistake. They have legitimate uses.
I don't think that ZClasses have real use in the current Zope world except
for legacy code. Most people
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 Mar 2006, at 16:25, Jim Fulton wrote:
On the subject of deprecation, for the record, I think removing
ZClasses is a mistake. They have legitimate uses. They have major
flaws too. It would help if we would more clearl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 Mar 2006, at 16:25, Jim Fulton wrote:
On the subject of deprecation, for the record, I think removing
ZClasses is a mistake. They have legitimate uses. They have major
flaws too. It would help if we would more clearly document their
limita
On the subject of deprecation, for the record, I think removing
ZClasses is a mistake. They have legitimate uses. They have major
flaws too. It would help if we would more clearly document their
limitations and pitfalls, rather than get rid of them, at least
until we have something better,
Ji
13 matches
Mail list logo
