Baiju M wrote:
Paul Carduner wrote:
Log message for revision 85449: creating a branch to see what I can
do about extjs integration.
Is Paul Carduner paying attention to this thread? He's still continuing
to check in code that uses ExtJS.
Granted we don't *distribute* ExtJS, but we're
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like today they changed their licence to GPL v3 !
I don't know if that exclamation mark is of joy or woe. I vote for woe.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like today they changed their licence to GPL v3 !
I don't know if that exclamation mark is of joy or woe. I vote for woe.
I don't know if woe is
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like today they changed their licence to GPL v3 !
I don't know if that exclamation mark is of joy or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like today they changed their
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
We *still* can't put the ExtJS code itself into svn.zope.org, but
perhaps we can now allow checking in ZPLed code which uses it.
No, we can't. I am willing to be overridden by the Foundation Board on
this. Absent that, consider this an edict. :)
Actually we
Regarding Ext's licensing, I'm told that they are planning to switch
to an OSI-approved license in the near future; we're still waiting for
more details, but my source is here:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/opencore/lists/opencore-dev/archive/2008/04/1208546123405
- PW
--
Paul Winkler
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
can you elaborate with a few more sentences
why?
I could, but I'd rather not. I suggest reading:
http://mjg59.livejournal.com/84586.html
if you haven't already.
I concur with Jim - let's avoid ExtJS as their license is not clear.
When I studied th details of
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
can you elaborate with a few more sentences
why?
I could, but I'd rather not. I suggest reading:
http://mjg59.livejournal.com/84586.html
if you haven't already.
I concur
Paul Carduner wrote:
Log message for revision 85449: creating a branch to see what I can
do about extjs integration.
I found Jim removing two of his extjs related libraries from svn due
to license issues (r85246, r85248).
Please make sure that there is no license issue for your work
Previously Baiju M wrote:
Since extjs is released under LGPL, I guess you can release the library in a
similar license, but only ZPL licensed thing can be committed to our svn :(
There is still an ongoing debate about that even - the extjs authors
basically only want to offer LGPL to you if you
On Friday 18 April 2008, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
There is still an ongoing debate about that even - the extjs authors
basically only want to offer LGPL to you if you meet certain criteria
but won't allow you to redistribute it with just standard LGPL
licensing.
I just researched this a little
On Apr 18, 2008, at 14:09 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 18 April 2008, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
There is still an ongoing debate about that even - the extjs authors
basically only want to offer LGPL to you if you meet certain criteria
but won't allow you to redistribute it with just
On Apr 18, 2008, at 4:28 AM, Baiju M wrote:
Paul Carduner wrote:
Log message for revision 85449: creating a branch to see what I can
do about extjs integration.
I found Jim removing two of his extjs related libraries from svn due
to license issues (r85246, r85248).
Please make sure that
On Friday 18 April 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
Because of ExtJS licensing issues, we should not check anything into
the repository that builds on or requires ExtJS in any way.
I assume you got lawyer advice; can you elaborate with a few more sentences
why? (I did read their license stuff last
On Apr 18, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 18 April 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
Because of ExtJS licensing issues, we should not check anything into
the repository that builds on or requires ExtJS in any way.
I assume you got lawyer advice;
No.
can you elaborate with a
16 matches
Mail list logo
