Interesting post. I am still not sure to what level I'll look to Google
for app infrastructure. Seems to me there are too many restrictions on
what you'd really be able to deploy and then you're stuck with married
to what they've got for better or worse. On the other hand, Stripping
zope to
perhaps too late to help with the sprints, but i got zope3 running on
app engine last week http://zope3.appspot.com and
http://zope3.appspot.com/tests, and blogged about to
http://blog.kapilt.com
most of zope.app isn't useable due to persistence or containment and
security proxies, but page
Am Sonntag, 25. Mai 2008 13:32 schrieb Andreas Jung:
--On 24. Mai 2008 15:44:01 +0200 Hermann Himmelbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I currently use
SQLAlchemy, but it seems that transactions are managed on the RDB-level
only, which means that the object state is not in the transaction
--On 24. Mai 2008 15:44:01 +0200 Hermann Himmelbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently use
SQLAlchemy, but it seems that transactions are managed on the RDB-level
only, which means that the object state is not in the transaction scope.
Huh? If you use one of the integration
Am Freitag, 23. Mai 2008 18:19 schrieb David Pratt:
Hi Jodok. I had looked at storm a while back but the zope integration
seemed to lack any relationship with zope schemas. I guess it is
possible to define a zope schema that is not persisted and create the
tables from it. It did not seem to
Hello Jodok,
Please contact Georgy Berdyshev (codingmaster at gmail.com) who has
Zope on Jython as a GSOC project.
I think your interests about the C modules could be quite close.
Thursday, May 22, 2008, 10:53:33 PM, you wrote:
JB On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:53 PM, David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jodok. I had looked at storm a while back but the zope integration
seemed to lack any relationship with zope schemas. I guess it is
possible to define a zope schema that is not persisted and create the
tables from it. It did not seem to me a good way of using CA. How are
you managing this
Hi,
Next week Lovely will be sprinting in New York/San Francisco to get
the Zope3 framework and the first applications running on Google
AppEngine. You’re welcome to join us.
Google AppEngine is a perfect match to the transition we at Lovely
Systems made during the last 12 month in
Hi Jodok. Sounds interesting. Curious what you are replacing ZODB with.
Are you using its interfaces to Relstorage / other ZODB backend, an ORM
to map direct to rdb, or other database. Many thanks.
Regards,
David
Jodok Batlogg wrote:
Hi,
Next week Lovely will be sprinting in New York/San
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:53 PM, David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jodok. Sounds interesting. Curious what you are replacing ZODB with. Are
you using its interfaces to Relstorage / other ZODB backend, an ORM to map
direct to rdb, or other database. Many thanks.
right now we're using
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi jodok
Betreff: [Zope-dev] Zope3 on Google AppEngine
Hi,
Next week Lovely will be sprinting in New York/San Francisco
to get the Zope3 framework and the first applications running
on Google AppEngine. You're
11 matches
Mail list logo
