How can I use this line ? Do I need any product ?
Anderson
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/list
Hi Anderson,
Anderson Ami wrote:
> How can I use this line ? Do I need any product ?
>
>
I don't understand your question. Perhaps you need to explain your
situation in more detail.
In any case, this looks like a question about using Zope rather than
about the development of zope itsel
Michael Bernstein wrote:
> Jimmie Houchin wrote:
> >
> > I would like to echo Michael's sentiment and comments. I am at the
> > beginning stage of Zope development of a website which will have
> > millions of objects of a single object type and multiple of such.
>
> are your objects intended to b
I don't know if this was mentioned earlier, but you might want to check
out the OracleStorage product which allows you to use Oracle as storage
for the ZODB.
http://www.zope.org/Products/OracleStorage
This solution would likely scale to your needs.
Also there are several object databases like M
I'm still lost as to when __bobo_traverse__ is checked for object traversal
and when not.
I have very simple piece of SkinScript: WITH SELF COMPUTE __bobo_traverse__
= traversal_method. Looking at the traverse method in BaseRequest.py it
looks to me as if an object is always checked if it has a
It sounds to me like you're trying to have SkinScript supply a
bobo_traverse for the Specialist itself, and this you cannot do. (There
are other ways to change a Specialist's bobo_traverse behavior, but
SkinScript is not one of them.) The SkinScript you're doing is meaningful
only if you want to
Suppose I have a list of existing folder objects and depending
on their index in the list I want to set a property called 'rang'.
I assumed you could something like this:
(normally the list comes from outside)
Any ideas or hints? Thanks
Arno Gross,
> While that would work for the simple object case, I find the
> prospect of storing a bunch of BLOBs (for the image data of
> the Photos) in an RDBMS to be *most* un-appetizing. Storing
> them on the server's file-system seems in-elegant as well.
Okey dokey, just a suggestion. I have heard peopl
Arno Gross wrote:
> Suppose I have a list of existing folder objects and depending
> on their index in the list I want to set a property called 'rang'.
>
> I assumed you could something like this:
>
>
>
> (normally the list comes from outside)
>
>
>
Here, you're getting an item w
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Michael Bernstein wrote:
> as Squishdot). Adding a dependency on an RDBMS or requiring
> additional setup on the server's FS seems a step in the
> wrong direction.
[...]
> So the question remains: Will either approach (within the
> ZODB) allow me to scale the application to hu
> It sounds to me like you're trying to have SkinScript supply a
> bobo_traverse for the Specialist itself, and this you cannot do. (There
> are other ways to change a Specialist's bobo_traverse behavior, but
> SkinScript is not one of them.) The SkinScript you're doing is meaningful
> only if y
Hello, everyone,
It seems that many of you have used ZCatalog pretty well.
My problem is that I'd like a ZClass (of a Product) to subclass
CatalogAware, and implement all the index and search inside the Product.
That means I don't want to do any DTML method stuff outside of the Product.
Could
Michael Bernstein wrote:
> So, again: Has anyone run up against any performance or
> other limitations regarding large numbers (hundreds of
> thousands or more) of objects stored within the ZODB either
> in a BTree Folder or a Rack?
I was looking into the same issues recently, but for a much sma
Does ZPatterns provide a nice interface / way for storing classes in a
RDBMS? I have to say using an RDBMS is not as transparent as I would like,
this may may improve it. Finally a reason for me to ZPatterns...
--
Andy McKay.
- Original Message -
From: "John Eikenberry" <[EMAIL PROTEC
On a more minor note would it be possible to get rid of the old style dtml
syntax (
John Eikenberry wrote:
>
> Michael Bernstein wrote:
>
> > So, again: Has anyone run up against any performance or
> > other limitations regarding large numbers (hundreds of
> > thousands or more) of objects stored within the ZODB either
> > in a BTree Folder or a Rack?
>
> I was looking into th
Andy McKay wrote:
>
> > While that would work for the simple object case, I find the
> > prospect of storing a bunch of BLOBs (for the image data of
> > the Photos) in an RDBMS to be *most* un-appetizing. Storing
> > them on the server's file-system seems in-elegant as well.
>
> Okey dokey, just
RDM wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Michael Bernstein wrote:
> > as Squishdot). Adding a dependency on an RDBMS or requiring
> > additional setup on the server's FS seems a step in the
> > wrong direction.
> [...]
> > So the question remains: Will either approach (within the
> > ZODB) allow me to
Andy McKay wrote:
> Does ZPatterns provide a nice interface / way for storing classes in a
> RDBMS? I have to say using an RDBMS is not as transparent as I would like,
> this may may improve it. Finally a reason for me to ZPatterns...
The best way to get a taste is to try it out. The easiest wa
Lily Li wrote:
>
> Hello, everyone,
>
> It seems that many of you have used ZCatalog pretty well.
>
> My problem is that I'd like a ZClass (of a Product) to subclass
> CatalogAware, and implement all the index and search inside the Product.
> That means I don't want to do any DTML method stuff
Michael Bernstein wrote:
> John Eikenberry wrote:
> >
> > I was looking into the same issues recently, but for a much smaller set of
> > data (5ish). In my tests ZPatterns/binary-trees scaled well for storage
> > and retrieval. But ZCatalog did not. It was basically useless for partial
> > m
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Michael Bernstein wrote:
> I do not know if BTree folders and Racks share the same
> B-Tree implementation, which is why I qualified my statement
> as 'slightly less confident'.
I'm fairly certain that BTree folders, Squishdot, and Racks all
use the BTree module that comes wi
... and what's the chance of getting my minor (but incredibly nice) change
to the management menus in?
I'd rather not have to ship a modified version of Zope...
Richard
ps. for those who missed the first post, I'm advocating that the ordering
of the management menu tree be done by the Ob
John Eikenberry wrote:
>
>
> Long answer: If you check out the source and/or hit it with the profiler
> you'll see that the way the partial search works is to first do a more
> general search then to limit the hits as much as possible via regex's.
> Both these steps have to happen no matter the
Hello all,
Zope 2.3.0 beta 1 is now available. You can download it from
Zope.org:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.3.0b1/
This release contains the final new features for 2.3, including:
- A browser preferences screen to allow people to
tweak certain aspects of the new man
25 matches
Mail list logo
