Hi.
I just fixed something for myself that was simply a little annoying detail:
The preferences dialog (which is used far to less i think) lets one choose
how big dtml method/document editing boxes (textarea) should be. I know that
IE resizes them automatically (was it css or jscript?) but opera
I'd like to see ZSQL methods altered so that bind variables could be used in
SQL queries.
This would improve SQL operations for at least Oracle, which is the one db
I know of that uses bind variables to speed it's querie-management.
This is filed as a bugreport in the collector previously but h
Romain Slootmaekers wrote:
>
> - Loggers (fi, file logger, db loggers, remote logger, nulllogger,...)
Zope already has a filer logger, I dunno what you mean by db, remote and null loggers,
perhaps you can explain?
> - Filters (fi on severity, on subsystem, ...)
zLOG already provides this.
Se
On Thursday 28 February 2002 3:00 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote:
>Paul sent a note to zope-coders some time back fishing for
>some feedback regarding planning for a Zope 2.6 (excepted):
>> I propose that planning for a 2.6 focus on the following thoughts:
>I wholeheartedly agree that 2.6 needs to be sig
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Chris Withers wrote:
> Romain Slootmaekers wrote:
> >
> > - Loggers (fi, file logger, db loggers, remote logger, nulllogger,...)
>
> Zope already has a filer logger, I dunno what you mean by db, remote and null
>loggers,
> perhaps you can explain?
>
db= log to database..
> > Absolutely ... and I would also like to see Richards excellent Call
> > Profiler service become part of the core.
>
> I'm definitely putting the profiler into 2.6 - there's just an open question
> of where it gets put. The question was asked on zope-coders, and got no
> response. I figure
> > I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in
> > Zope by default. That is, I'd like "Synchronization", to a be a default
> > property of Zope objects, so that objects/content can be pushed and
> > pulled between two Zope installations.
>
> I would use ZCVSFolder or
seb bacon wrote:
>
> I think the use cases driving synchronisation requirements are not yet
> sufficiently understood. Agreed, it's a feature that many people need,
> but I get the impression it would be premature to include ZSyncer as is
> in Zope without more detailed planning. On the other ha
Steve Alexander wrote:
>
> Yeah... maybe we need a standard "Zope Expansion Kit" that is a cohesive
> package of products that aren't in the Zope core, but are officially
> sanctioned and versioned and released alongside versions of Zope.
I thought that's what the /Products directory in the stan
Toby Dickenson wrote:
>
> The 2.6 timeframe should allow me to find some time to integrate my Unicode
> support (in ZPublisher, ZServer, and DTML), if there is agreement that this
> is the right thing to do.
I'd +1 that in a big way :-)
Especially combined with landing all Andreas' cool ZCatalo
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:00
Subject: [Zope-Coders] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!
>
> I wholeheartedly agree that 2.6 needs to be significantly a community
+1, and I say that knowing that it means I have to help. I'm willing to
write the docs for whoever works on the code.
A gentle reminder on some of the posts in this thread. Please don't
respond with "I'd really like ." Respond with "I'm
willing to do the work for ." That's part of the poi
If I had to make a wild guess, I would say 2.6 might land in the
May-June timeframe.
I would anticipate a drive for finalization in May, with the release
cycle in June.
That's not official, just a good guess based on our historical release
patterns.
On Friday, March 1, 2002, at 06:56 AM, Ch
I'd suggest starting with the combination of Evan's zopemake and zctl
scripts. One thing that zopemake could be extended with is an
autoconf-style "configure" that figures out where the appropriate version of
Python is, which C compiler to use, etc.
- C
- Original Message -
From: "Paul
Romain Slootmaekers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> db= log to database...
>
> remote:what if you want your logs to be put on another machine
>
> null logger does nothing.
Handling the log output should be _completely_ separated from
Zope.
On the fly changes to log levels and separating oupu
Have you looked at EventLogManager?
http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/Products/EventLogManager
If I had it to do over again, I'd change lots, but it does do what you're
asking for.
> what if I want to split the logs based on some condition
> I have to change code in Zope, and restart the se
I would say, make SSL part of the standard z2.py, so you can turn on/off,
specify address, etc. of https ports just as you do with http ports (and of
course integrated with siteaccess2, etc.)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zop
On Fri, 01 Mar 2002 09:48:08 -0500, marc lindahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I would say, make SSL part of the standard z2.py, so you can turn on/off,
>specify address, etc. of https ports just as you do with http ports (and of
>course integrated with siteaccess2, etc.)
Ive never really understo
Romain Slootmaekers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Handling the log output should be _completely_ separated from
> > Zope.
> what do you mean exactly by '_completely_ separated'
>
> do you mean asynchronous handling ?
Completely separated means that it isn't Zope's job to care for rotating
log
On 01 Mar 2002 16:27:18 +0100, Frank Tegtmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Completely separated means that it isn't Zope's job to care for rotating
>logs, filtering them and what else you could do to logs. There are
>lots of programs out there that are specialized in handling log data.
>
>We for
See PEP 282 [1]. If this PEP is accepted, work should probably follow its
course. It would be nice to have a single logging mechanism for Python, and
for Zope to use and/or extend it. Granted, if it is accepted, it won't be
in Python until Python 2.3 which I believe is due in August.
..[1] htt
On 3/1/02 7:30 AM, "Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd suggest starting with the combination of Evan's zopemake and zctl
> scripts. One thing that zopemake could be extended with is an
> autoconf-style "configure" that figures out where the appropriate version of
> Python is, whic
On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 04:16, Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
> I'd like to see ZSQL methods altered so that bind variables could be used in
> SQL queries.
+1, even though MySQL doesn't bind variables (yet, apparently in the
works for 4.0).
Another thing I would like (and could probably write) is an ad
This hotfix addresses an important security issue that may affect some
users of Zope versions 2.2.0 through 2.5.x
The issue involves the checking of security for objects with proxy
roles. The context of the owner user that created the object with proxy
roles was not being taken into account w
I'm having some issues trying to use ZEO on Win2k w/ Apache and Quixote.
Specifically:
- if I happen to call client code before the server is running, I get
a python process which is completely hung -- I can't even kill it from
the process monitor w/ administrator privs. Every client request
25 matches
Mail list logo
