RE: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.1.6 ZCatalog: minor bug, missing find import -- with patch

2000-05-30 Thread Brian Lloyd

 I just found a minor bug in Zope 2.1.6's ZCatalog (distribution).
 
 "ZCatalog.py" does not import "find".
 If the "containing" field contains a value, a NameError exception
 is raised.
 
 Patch appended.
 
 Dieter
 

Thanks for the report - it looks like this was already fixed
for 2.2.


Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer  540.371.6909  
Digital Creations  http://www.digicool.com 

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




RE: [Zope-dev] Ending up with a wrapped object through the web?

2000-05-30 Thread Brian Lloyd

  When importing the .zexp, I get an "Attempt to store a 
 wrapped persistent
  object" error. This is really puzzling, because I'm not sure how a
  completely through-the-web Product would have a wrapped 
 object stored in it.
  I tried removing the PythonMethods to see if they were 
 stored in an unusual
  way, and this did not change the behavior...
 
 It's not just you - I've been unable to get any imports to work in
 current-cvs.
 
 Anthony

Hi guys - 

If you are using CVS, you need to do an update in ZODB to update
the coptimizations.c file then rebuild the coptimizations module. 
That should fix the problem...


Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer  540.371.6909  
Digital Creations  http://www.digicool.com 



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] Ending up with a wrapped object through the web?

2000-05-30 Thread Kevin Dangoor

 If you are using CVS, you need to do an update in ZODB to update
 the coptimizations.c file then rebuild the coptimizations module.
 That should fix the problem...

That did the trick. One oddity, though: I had to reauthenticate as the
superuser to do it. Shouldn't a Manager be able to import to
Control_Panel/Products?

Kevin


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] Z SQL: optional isn't?

2000-05-30 Thread Kyler B. Laird


On Tue, 30 May 2000 17:09:20 +1000 (EST) you wrote:

 I like the optional attribute.  I'd like to see
 it do more than sit idle in the code.

You don't have to do the typechecking in the 'arguments' box if you don't
want. eg. in your arguments section:

course=""
subject=""

O.k., it appears that I can still use that with
integers.  I can live with that.  I don't like
setting an integer to what appears to be a
string, but it does work.


select * from enrolments
dtml-sqlgroup where
dtml-sqltest course type=int optional
dtml-sqltest subject type=nb optional
/dtml-sqlgroup

The definition of the 'optional' tag from the docs might help here:
'''A flag indicating if the test is optional. If the test is optional
and no value is provided for a variable, or the value provided is
an invalid empty string, then no text is inserted'''
 
I should have been more specific.  I was
referring to the "optional" attribute of the
*argument* (not the sqltest).  I found that
it's coded in Aqueduct.py, but I'm not aware
of any way to set it from the Z SQL method
form.

Hmm... looking at this definition, it seems you have found a bug
(but setting the default value to "" in the arguments section will
provide a workaround). Or maybe 'no value provided' means 'is None'.
Anyone from DC want to provide a ruling? :-)

Originally, after reading the above ("optional"
in sqltest) definition, I'd hoped to be able to
simply list the variable in the arguments
section and make it optional in the sqltest.
After looking at the code, I determined that
this was not a reasonable expectation.  (What
if I used two sqltests and it was only optional
in one?)

In the course of investigating this, however, I
found that an optional attribute for an
argument is recognized.  It seems like this is
what should be used.

I can live with it either way, but I think that
optional is better than integer_var="". I'd
like to see whatever is chosen documented, and
I'd like to see "optional" removed from 
Aqueduct.py if it's not going to be supported.
(Maybe it's used by something else?)

--kyler

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] 'import' busted in current-cvs.

2000-05-30 Thread Anthony Baxter


Ok dokey, I've done a rebuild, and now, when trying to import
stuff as a user with 'Manager' privs, I get...

  You are not authorized to access RoleManager. 

  Traceback (innermost last):
File /opt/zope/zope-cvs/./lib/python/ZPublisher/Publish.py, line 224, in 
publish_module
File /opt/zope/zope-cvs/./lib/python/ZPublisher/Publish.py, line 189, in publish
File /opt/zope/zope-cvs/./lib/python/ZPublisher/Publish.py, line 175, in publish
File /opt/zope/zope-cvs/Zope2/lib/python/ZPublisher/mapply.py, line 160, in mapply
  (Object: manage_importObject)
File /opt/zope/zope-cvs/./lib/python/ZPublisher/Publish.py, line 112, in 
call_object
  (Object: manage_importObject)
File /opt/zope/zope-cvs/lib/python/OFS/ObjectManager.py, line 525, in 
manage_importObject
  (Object: RoleManager)
File /opt/zope/zope-cvs/lib/python/OFS/CopySupport.py, line 371, in 
_verifyObjectPaste
  (Object: RoleManager)
File /opt/zope/zope-cvs/./lib/python/AccessControl/SecurityManager.py, line 147, 
in validateValue
File /opt/zope/zope-cvs/lib/python/AccessControl/ZopeSecurityPolicy.py, line 212, 
in validate
  Unauthorized: (see above)

As an aside - should issues with current-cvs go into the Collector? 
Many times it seems stuff is fixed well before the Collector gets 
seen to.

Anthony
-- 
Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] Z SQL: optional isn't?

2000-05-30 Thread Stuart 'Zen' Bishop

On Mon, 29 May 2000, Kyler B. Laird wrote:

 This is not the same functionality as is provided
 by the "optional" attribute.  How would I use it
 with an integer, for example?  I don't want a
 default value; I want the option of not having
 the value set at all.
 
 I like the optional attribute.  I'd like to see
 it do more than sit idle in the code.

You don't have to do the typechecking in the 'arguments' box if you don't
want. eg. in your arguments section:

course=""
subject=""

And your method:

select * from enrolments
dtml-sqlgroup where
dtml-sqltest course type=int optional
dtml-sqltest subject type=nb optional
/dtml-sqlgroup

The definition of the 'optional' tag from the docs might help here:
'''A flag indicating if the test is optional. If the test is optional
and no value is provided for a variable, or the value provided is
an invalid empty string, then no text is inserted'''

Hmm... looking at this definition, it seems you have found a bug
(but setting the default value to "" in the arguments section will
provide a workaround). Or maybe 'no value provided' means 'is None'.
Anyone from DC want to provide a ruling? :-)

-- 
Stuart Bishop  Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Alchemist   Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Science, RMIT University


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




[Zope-dev] CatalogAwareness for RackMountables

2000-05-30 Thread Itamar Shtull-Trauring

I've been playing around with ZPatterns, and I must say it's very cool -
finally you can mix ZCatalog and SQL storage.  CatalogAwareness is slightly
different than regular Zope objects in that you have to find the ZCatalog in
the Rack's acquisition path, but that's about it.

The absolute_url function I define here should be moved to the RackMountable
class since it may be useful in other situations.

-

from Products.ZCatalog.CatalogAwareness import CatalogAware
from Products.ZPatterns.Rack import _v_rack, RackMountable

class RMCatalogAwareMixIn(CatalogAware):
""" 
CatalogAwareness for RackMountables.
You need to inherit from this class before RackMountable.

Objects are NOT automatically indexed, because no rack has
been defined when we're in __init__.
"""

def absolute_url(self, relative=0):
""" URL for catalog-awareness """
return "%s/%s" % (self._v_rack.absolute_url(relative), self.id)

def index_object(self):
"""A common method to allow Findables to index themselves."""
if hasattr(self._v_rack, self.default_catalog):
getattr(self._v_rack, self.default_catalog).catalog_object(self,
self.url())

def unindex_object(self):
"""A common method to allow Findables to unindex themselves."""
if hasattr(self._v_rack, self.default_catalog):
try:
getattr(self._v_rack,
self.default_catalog).uncatalog_object(self.url())
except:
pass

def manage_delete(self, _v_rack=_v_rack):
""" Uncatalog this object and then delete it """
self.unindex_object()
return RackMountable.manage_delete(self, _v_rack)

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




[Zope-dev] CatalogAwareness for RackMountables

2000-05-30 Thread Itamar Shtull-Trauring

Sorry if this arrives twice, but mailing lists seem to have swallowed my
earlier mail.

I've been playing around with ZPatterns, and I must say it's very cool -
finally you can mix ZCatalog and SQL storage.  CatalogAwareness is slightly
different than regular Zope objects in that you have to find the ZCatalog in
the Rack's acquisition path, but that's about it.

The absolute_url function I define here should be moved to the RackMountable
class since it may be useful in other situations.

-

from Products.ZCatalog.CatalogAwareness import CatalogAware
from Products.ZPatterns.Rack import _v_rack, RackMountable

class RMCatalogAwareMixIn(CatalogAware):
""" 
CatalogAwareness for RackMountables.
You need to inherit from this class before RackMountable.

Objects are NOT automatically indexed, because no rack has
been defined when we're in __init__.
"""

def absolute_url(self, relative=0):
""" URL for catalog-awareness """
return "%s/%s" % (self._v_rack.absolute_url(relative), self.id)

def index_object(self):
"""A common method to allow Findables to index themselves."""
if hasattr(self._v_rack, self.default_catalog):
getattr(self._v_rack, self.default_catalog).catalog_object(self,
self.url())

def unindex_object(self):
"""A common method to allow Findables to unindex themselves."""
if hasattr(self._v_rack, self.default_catalog):
try:
getattr(self._v_rack,
self.default_catalog).uncatalog_object(self.url())
except:
pass

def manage_delete(self, _v_rack=_v_rack):
""" Uncatalog this object and then delete it """
self.unindex_object()
return RackMountable.manage_delete(self, _v_rack)

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




RE: [Zope-dev] Ending up with a wrapped object through the web?

2000-05-30 Thread Brian Lloyd

 
  That did the trick. One oddity, though: I had to 
 reauthenticate as the
  superuser to do it. Shouldn't a Manager be able to import to
  Control_Panel/Products?
 
 worse yet - you can't import _at_ _all_ outside the control panel.
 
 A manager can't access RoleManager. superuser can't own objects.

Ok - this should be fixed now in CVS. Part of the machinery that
checks whether the user is really allowed to create the type of 
object they are importing was failing spuriously because it 
expected the object it was checking to be wrapped (which isn't 
the case when checking an imported object to see if it can be
added).

Update AccessControl/User.py to get the fix.


Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer  540.371.6909  
Digital Creations  http://www.digicool.com 



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] Ending up with a wrapped object through the web?

2000-05-30 Thread Anthony Baxter


 "Kevin Dangoor" wrote
  If you are using CVS, you need to do an update in ZODB to update
  the coptimizations.c file then rebuild the coptimizations module.
  That should fix the problem...
 
 That did the trick. One oddity, though: I had to reauthenticate as the
 superuser to do it. Shouldn't a Manager be able to import to
 Control_Panel/Products?

worse yet - you can't import _at_ _all_ outside the control panel.

A manager can't access RoleManager. superuser can't own objects.

*sigh*

Anthony, still trying to get XMLWidgets installed...

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] Memory 2.1.4-2.1.6 a.k.a. how to get objects out of the cache

2000-05-30 Thread Jason Spisak

Bill Anderson:

 Jason Spisak wrote:
 
 [...]
 
  That's funny that I am experienceing the same symptoms as you, but my
  installation is totally different. I'm not using GUF, or any DA's, and I'm
  running on RH 6.1.  We really need to figure this out as a community.  I am
  willing to try just about anything short of shipping my machine somewhere
  off premisis. ;)
 
 
 Ok, let's dig up some more info ( or perhaps I missed it ).
 
 Server setup, as in pcgi/Zserver/Apache w/proxypass, etc?

Nothing but straight ZServer/Medusa.

 Compiled on the machine, or binary distribution?
 

 Zope 2.1.1 binary distro. Not sure how it got to be 2.1.4/2.1.6, might
have been the other person having problems, or my mistake.  But the changes
in 2.1.4 and 2.1.6 aren't anything in the Object publisher or Medusa so I
don't think it makes a difference.


 If source, did you start with a clean tree, or did use use the diff
 upgrade, or did you use a new 2.1.6 tarball, and drop it on top of the
 2.1.4 install?
 
 Bill

RH 6.1
2.2.12smp kernel
Hardware RAID
dual 350mhz Xenon 
1 gig ram

Vanilla Zope with no DA's, no Apache.


BTW, Matthew gave me some advice last Friday to use the setcheckinterval
line in z2.py and the performance gains are quite impressive.  Anyone who
is running smp should try it.


All my best,

Jason Spisak
CIO
HireTechs.com
6151 West Century Boulevard
Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90045
P. 310.665.3444
F. 310.665.3544

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] Calling DTML methods from Python

2000-05-30 Thread Rik Hoekstra



Andrew Wilcox wrote:
 
 OK, I'll set up a DTML Quick Reference on the ZDP site right now! It's link
 is
 
 http://zdp.zope.org/portals/beginners/DQR
 
 We should be able to get this in place. Contributions sought!
 
 Do you want me to include my text?  Where would it go?

Yes. Hm, this is already rather specific. I'll paste it into a section
(Topic) called Calling DTML. We may need to revise the topics
afterwards, but that doesn't really matter now.

Note that you can make your own topics (at least I think you can). Last
night I couldn't finish it, but I thought the idea would be there as is.
I'll try and work on it a bit today.

thanks

Rik

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




[Zope-dev] Memory issue 2.1.1 request for info

2000-05-30 Thread Jason Spisak

Matthew T. Kromer:

 I'm extremely curious that the cache doesn't clear when you restart Zope.
 One would normally not expect to see this.  Can you do a "ps xauww" and mail
 it to me / the list?  

USER   PID %CPU %MEM   VSZ  RSS TTY  STAT START   TIME COMMAND
root 1  0.0  0.0  1104   72 ?SMay26   0:05 init [3]
root 2  0.0  0.0 00 ?SW   May26   0:03 [kflushd]
root 3  0.0  0.0 00 ?SW   May26   0:02 [kupdate]
root 4  0.0  0.0 00 ?SW   May26   0:00 [kpiod]
root 5  0.0  0.0 00 ?SW   May26   0:03 [kswapd]
root 6  0.0  0.0 00 ?SW  May26   0:00
[mdrecoveryd]
root 9  0.0  0.0 00 ?SW   May26   0:00
[scsi_eh_0]
bin330  0.0  0.0  11960 ?SW   May26   0:00 [portmap]
root   359  0.0  0.0  1156  144 ?SMay26   0:00 syslogd
-m 0
root   370  0.0  0.0  13960 ?SW   May26   0:00 [klogd]
daemon 386  0.0  0.0  1128  104 ?SMay26   0:00
/usr/sbin/atd
root   402  0.0  0.0  1304  108 ?SMay26   0:00 crond
root   418  0.0  0.0  11240 ?SW   May26   0:00 [inetd]
root   434  0.0  0.0  11760 ?SW   May26   0:00 [lpd]
root   457  0.0  0.0  22040 tty1 SW   May26   0:00 [login]
root   458  0.0  0.0  10760 tty2 SW   May26   0:00
[mingetty]
root   459  0.0  0.0  10760 tty3 SW   May26   0:00
[mingetty]
root   460  0.0  0.0  10760 tty4 SW   May26   0:00
[mingetty]
root   461  0.0  0.0  10760 tty5 SW   May26   0:00
[mingetty]
root   462  0.0  0.0  10760 tty6 SW   May26   0:00
[mingetty]
zope   465  0.0  0.0  17400 tty1 SW   May26   0:00 [bash]
root   498  0.0  0.0  2360   32 ?SMay26   0:00
[in.rlogind]
root   499  0.0  0.0  22880 pts/0SW   May26   0:00 [login]
jason  500  0.0  0.0  1752  484 pts/0SMay26   0:00 -bash
zope  1992  0.0  0.0  31880 tty1 SW   May29   0:01 [python]
zope  1996  0.0 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29   1:33
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  1998  0.0 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29   0:02
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  1999  0.0 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29   0:00
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  2000  0.0 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29   0:00
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  2001  1.4 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29  23:39
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  2002  0.0 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29   0:13
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  2003  0.0 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29   0:08
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  2004  0.0 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29   0:00
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  2005  0.0 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29   0:42
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  2006  0.0 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29   0:00
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  2007  0.0 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29   0:00
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
zope  2008  1.1 22.2 220152 216340 tty1  SMay29  17:55
/Zope/bin/python /Zope/z2.py -t 10 -D
root  2474  0.0  0.0  23600 ?SW   09:35   0:00
[in.rlogind]
root  2475  0.0  0.0  22920 pts/1SW   09:35   0:00 [login]
jason 2476  0.0  0.0  17480 pts/1SW   09:35   0:00 [bash]
jason 2610  0.0  0.0  2508  864 pts/0R11:41   0:00 ps xauww


The memory values are significantly smaller % for the threads than they
were orignially.  Shane had me set the "Target Time Between Accesses" to
3 seconds.  I have futzed with it and now have it at 30 seconds.  Also,
the "target Size" was at 20,000 objects and now I have it at 10,000.


Also a "free" would be helpful too. 

 total   used   free sharedbuffers
cached
Mem:971452 966896   4556   2448 627104 
92608
-/+ buffers/cache: 247184 724268
Swap:   128480   6732 121748


 Under linux,
 shared memory is amongst the last to be scavenged in low memory conditions.
 I'm curious to see if something is allocating that memory as shared or what.
 
 You might also try an "ipcs -a" command to make sure it's not SYSV type
 shared memory (which can stick around even after a process exits.)


-- Shared Memory Segments 
key   shmid owner perms bytes nattchstatus  

-- Semaphore Arrays 
key   semid owner perms nsems status  

-- Message Queues 
key   msqid owner perms used-bytes  messages


Things are moving pretty speedilly since I adjusted the
setcheckinterval.  Thanks Matt!!
I'll send the output of these commands after a Zope exit at the end of
our intranet business here today.

Just think, with ZEO I won't have 

[Zope-dev] New Help System in 2.2

2000-05-30 Thread Jason Spisak

Michel,

I was just browsing the help system and can I just say it is terrfic.  The
.py files especially.  Not that python isn't that easy to read, but having
the ZQR type stuff handy online is a huge win.  Is that stuff updated fro
mthe source on the fly?

Greatfully,

Jason Spisak
CIO
HireTechs.com
6151 West Century Boulevard
Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90045
P. 310.665.3444
F. 310.665.3544

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] Cataloging LocalFS content

2000-05-30 Thread Jonothan Farr

 I think, cataloging "LocalFS" content would be nice.

 I have the following problems with it:

  1. "LocalFS" defines various meta types:
 "Local File System", "Local Directory" and "Local File".

 Only "Local File System" is a "true" meta type which
 should appear in the available objects list of ObjectManager's.

 However, I may well be useful, to select the others, too,
 in for "find" and cataloging.

This could be done, but my concern is that when changes are made to the file
system this will cause the catalog to be out of synch until you re-index. How
does this work with Zope objects? If you move or delete a Zope object that is
cataloged does it automatically update the catalog?


  2. ZCatalog uses "bobo_modification_time" in its meta table
 and for indexing. For "LocalFS" content, this is not
 the best modification time to use for indexing.

 It would be nice, if "bobo_modification_time" could somehow
 be synchronized with the object's modification time in the
 file system.

With the most recent version of LocalFS, the bobobase_modification_time should
be the same as the object's mtime in the file system. Please let me know the
details if you're seeing anything different.


--jfarr



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] New Help System in 2.2

2000-05-30 Thread Chris Withers

Shane Hathaway wrote:
 1) Enahnce the permissions system to include "Accessible via HTTP",
 "Accessible via FTP", etc.

Add to that 'execute in DTML method' ( + python methods  perl
methods;-) and you've got what I've been asking for for so long I've
atoped trying :(

This would prevent the nasty ability to do things like:
http://www.zope.org/standard_html_footer

This should not be accessible through HTTP, but should be through FTP
and DTML...

cheers,

Chris

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] Cataloging LocalFS content

2000-05-30 Thread Rik Hoekstra



 I think, cataloging "LocalFS" content would be nice.

 I have the following problems with it:

  1. "LocalFS" defines various meta types:
 "Local File System", "Local Directory" and "Local File".

 Only "Local File System" is a "true" meta type which
 should appear in the available objects list of ObjectManager's.

 However, I may well be useful, to select the others, too,
 in for "find" and cataloging.

This could be done, but my concern is that when changes are made to the
file
system this will cause the catalog to be out of synch until you re-index.
How
does this work with Zope objects? If you move or delete a Zope object that
is
cataloged does it automatically update the catalog?


Only if it is 'Catalog Aware', otherwise you'll have to update it manually.
In the case of LocalFS this will always be the only way.

Rik



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] New Help System in 2.2

2000-05-30 Thread Jason Spisak

Shane Hathaway writes:

 Jason Spisak wrote:
  I was just browsing the help system and can I just say it is terrfic.  The
  .py files especially.  Not that python isn't that easy to read, but having
  the ZQR type stuff handy online is a huge win.  Is that stuff updated from
  the source on the fly?
 
 Almost.  It's actually written in separate files that mirror the
 structure of the real source.  And I'd like to bring up the point that
 I wonder why it is written that way.  Wouldn't it make more sense to
 self-document the source?
 
 If the issue is that some methods shouldn't be callable from a URL,
 there are better solutions to that problem (this is written to DC
 mainly):

Is this the reason that it's not pulling the docs from the source?
That's not a good idea.  With all the effort that Michel put in to work
around not documenting in the source, he could have fixed it so that it
pulled the docs from the source on the fly without effecting the URL
access.

 1) Enahnce the permissions system to include "Accessible via HTTP",
 "Accessible via FTP", etc.
 2) Use an underscore as the first character of a docstring to indicate
 a non-URL-callable method.
 

I just looked at it and that seems like doing work twice.  Why not just
document your source?

Wonderingly,

Jason Spisak
CIO
HireTechs.com
6151 West Century Boulevard
Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90045
P. 310.665.3444
F. 310.665.3544

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] CatalogAwareness for RackMountables

2000-05-30 Thread Phillip J. Eby

At 12:53 PM 5/30/00 +0300, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
I've been playing around with ZPatterns, and I must say it's very cool -
finally you can mix ZCatalog and SQL storage.  CatalogAwareness is slightly
different than regular Zope objects in that you have to find the ZCatalog in
the Rack's acquisition path, but that's about it.

IMHO, you don't need to keep referring to self._v_rack to do the cataloging
as described, so long as you retrieve your objects from a Specialist; then
the acquisition path is via the Specialist.  I would suggest that you
modify your patches somewhat to reflect this, and use only self.*
attributes, not self._v_rack.*.  It will improve your forward-compatibility
with 0.4.0.


The absolute_url function I define here should be moved to the RackMountable
class since it may be useful in other situations.

I have to disagree with this, since the standard Zope absolute_url method
will work correctly, so long as you access a RackMountable by traversing
(via bobo_traverse) from a Specialist.  If you would like to make your work
easier with version 0.3.0, it would be best for you to move the __of__
wrapping from Specialist.__bobo_traverse__() to Specialist.getItem(), as I
have done in the working copy of 0.4.0.  This will ensure that whenever you
retrieve a rackmountable from a Specialist, it will be wrapped in context
of the Specialist.

Then, by deriving your classes from RackMountable and CatalogAware, you
need only adjust for the absence of add and delete hooks.  And you'll only
need to adjust for that until 0.4.0 makes add/change/delete hooks available
for indexing agents.  I don't know if there will be a Catalog IndexAgent
released with 0.4.0 yet, but there should be one eventually (or perhaps
someone will contribute one).


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] New Help System in 2.2

2000-05-30 Thread Stephan Richter

At 09:09 PM 5/30/00 +, Jason Spisak wrote:
Shane Hathaway writes:

  Jason Spisak wrote:
   I was just browsing the help system and can I just say it is 
 terrfic.  The
   .py files especially.  Not that python isn't that easy to read, but 
 having
   the ZQR type stuff handy online is a huge win.  Is that stuff updated 
 from
   the source on the fly?
 
  Almost.  It's actually written in separate files that mirror the
  structure of the real source.  And I'd like to bring up the point that
  I wonder why it is written that way.  Wouldn't it make more sense to
  self-document the source?
 
  If the issue is that some methods shouldn't be callable from a URL,
  there are better solutions to that problem (this is written to DC
  mainly):

Is this the reason that it's not pulling the docs from the source?
That's not a good idea.  With all the effort that Michel put in to work
around not documenting in the source, he could have fixed it so that it
pulled the docs from the source on the fly without effecting the URL
access.

  1) Enahnce the permissions system to include "Accessible via HTTP",
  "Accessible via FTP", etc.
  2) Use an underscore as the first character of a docstring to indicate
  a non-URL-callable method.
 

I just looked at it and that seems like doing work twice.  Why not just
document your source?

I just talked to Amos and Michel last Friday about that and they researched 
for a long time, whether it would be better to document the source or to 
have different files. They both decided it is the best to have the 
documentation separately. I believe that they looked at the issue from all 
angles and had good reasons, why they went with the current way.
Furthermore, the help system will become even more than just the screen 
help. The .py files you see, are just the start of the new API 
documentation. Furthermore, we will include a new DTML reference soon. Do 
you know about anything else, that should be included?

Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU - Physics and Chemistry
Web2k - Web Design/Development  Technical Project Management


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




[Zope-dev] ZDOM alpha release 2

2000-05-30 Thread Chimezie Thomas-Ogbuji

See release notes for changes (installation process simplified w/
release of 4DOM/4XSLT/4XPATH):

-- 
Chimezie Thomas-Ogbuji
Consultant
Fourthought Inc.
(303) 583 9900 ext 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

ZDOM is the result of a collaborative venture by Digital Creations and
Fourthought Inc. to integrate the W3C Document Object Model interface with
Zope, allowing effortless and familiar traversal of a Zope heirarchy.  
The current alpha release is based on Fourthought's 4DOM , which is one
component of Fourthought's 4Suite.
 
Fourthought provides custom technological solutions based on open
technologies.  4Suite is a powerful set of Python tools developed by
Fourthought for Web-based applications in areas such as Intranets,
E-Commerce and knowledge-management.  Elements of 4Suite have been adopted
as core XML technologies in Zope and in the Python XML distribution
 
The necessary files (which are all available on our ftp server:
ftp.fourthought.com) are
 
ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/mirrors/python4linux/redhat/i386/python-xml-nodom-0.5.4-1.i386.rpm
(Py-XML w/out DOM)

ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/mirrors/python4linux/redhat/i386/4DOM-0.10.0-1.noarch.rpm
 
(4DOM core)

ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/4Zope/ZDOM-dist.tgz
(ZDOM)
 
ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/4Zope/Zope-ZDOM-Patch
(patch file for Zope 2.1.6) OR

http://www.zope.org/Members/anthony/patches/4ZDOM-vs-CVS-0512.patch
(patch file for CVS/alpha 2.2 Zope) 

Documentation:
 
ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/4Zope/INSTALL.txt
(the installation instructions)
 
ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/4Zope/Readme.txt
(short description of ZDOM)
 
ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/4Zope/Release.txt
(release notes)   

links:

Fourthought: http://fourthought.com
4Suite: http://fourthought.com/4Suite/
DOM 2 Spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-DOM-Level-2-2307/
Zope http://www.zope.org
 
contact:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



Installing ZDOM
---

  This document describes installing ZDOM on Unix.

Important Notes

  ZDOM REQUIRES ZOPE AND PYTHON 1.5.2!
  Depending on which Zope version you wish to add ZDOM to, there
  are two patches to download

1) ftp://fourthought.com/pub/4Zope/Zope-ZDOM-Patch
 (patches Zope 2.1.6)
2) http://www.zope.org/Members/anthony/patches/4ZDOM-vs-CVS-0512.patch
 (Anthony Baxter's patch which works on the CVS source tree as of 5/16)


ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/mirrors/python4linux/redhat/i386/4DOM-0.10.0-1.noarch.rpm
 
(4DOM core)

ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/4Zope/ZDOM-dist.tgz
(ZDOM)
 
ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/4Zope/Zope-ZDOM-Patch
(patch file for Zope 2.1.6) OR

http://www.zope.org/Members/anthony/patches/4ZDOM-vs-CVS-0512.patch
(patch file for CVS/alpha 2.2 Zope) 


Installing

  First download these files from our FTP server:

/pub/mirrors/python4linux/redhat/i386/python-xml-nodom-0.5.4-1.i386.rpm
/pub/mirrors/python4linux/redhat/i386/4DOM-0.10.0-1.noarch.rpm 
/pub/4Zope/ZDOM-dist.tgz

/pub/4Zope/Zope-ZDOM-Patch OR
http://www.zope.org/Members/anthony/patches/4ZDOM-vs-CVS-0512.patch

  Install the rpms and decompress ZDOM-dist.tgz somewherer in your PYTHONPATH

  Install and build Zope 2.1.6 if not already done.
  This is required for the components to work.

  The following will install the patches to Zope objects
  to allow manipulation of Zope object via the DOM
  interface:

(the Zope2.1.6 patch assumes that the Zope src files reside in a 'Zope'
directory so a symbolic link is necessary)

ln -s [Zope install dir] Zope
cd (parent directory of Zope install dir)   -- if necessary
patch -p0  (location of dowloaded files)/Zope-ZDOM-Patch OR 
4ZDOM-vs-CVS-0512.patch

  Then add '(zope install dir)/lib/python' to your PYTHONPATH.




RELEASE NOTES
-
5/30/00

changed setAttributeNodeNS to check for aq_base and set to None if it doesn't
exist (since _setProperty expects aquisition to be set up -- but might not
be necessarily so since an element can be created and attributes can be
added WITHOUT it having a parent yet)

redirected computed attributes to instance methods so DOM interfaces can
be overode

added check for aq_base in setAttributeNodeNS (sets to None if it doesnt exist)

5/10/00

ZDOM alpha supports to complete DOM Level 2 Specification
(http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2/)

ZDOM maps the DOM interface to Zope, like so:

childNodes -   objectValues()
mappable subset of DOM 2 Interface -   attributes -   propdict()
parentNode -   self.aq_parent

Default implmentation of both objectValues() and propdict()
are provided on SImpleItem.Item for Zope Objects that do not
implement these interfaces. 

All Zope objects support the DOM Level 2 spec through the inheritence
of SimpleItem.Item from Element.

All objects (except as noted below) created by the use of the DOM
interface (i.e., NodeLists, NamedNodeMaps, childNodes for Attr) are
transient.

All Zope 

[Zope-dev] XMLDocument beta release 3

2000-05-30 Thread Chimezie Thomas-Ogbuji

See release notes for changes (installation process simplified w/
release of 4DOM/4XSLT/4XPATH):

-- 
Chimezie Thomas-Ogbuji
Consultant
Fourthought Inc.
(303) 583 9900 ext 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

XMLDocument beta is a collection of Zope products and python tools that
integrate XML into Zope, above and beyond the current XMLDocument product.
Like ZDOM, it is the result of a collaborative venture by Digital Creations and
Fourthought Inc.

XmlDocument

This is a Zope product that wraps XML content for use in Zope.  In many
ways it behaves similarly to the original XMLDocument, except it only
creates a single Zope object upon import or creation.

XMLImporter

This python module allows users to externally import XML content into
the Zope database in a 'controlled' manner.  The user has full range
of control over import parameters.

XSLT Method

This is a Zope product that wraps an XSLT stylesheet for use in Zope.
Like a DTML method, it can be invoked on a ClobXmlDocument instance
and return the resulting XSLT transformation.

Fourthought provides custom technological solutions based on open
technologies.  4Suite is a powerful set of Python tools developed by
Fourthought for Web-based applications in areas such as Intranets,
E-Commerce and knowledge-management.  Elements of 4Suite have been adopted
as core XML technologies in Zope and in the Python XML distribution


links:

Fourthought: http://fourthought.com
4Suite: http://fourthought.com/4Suite/
DOM 2 Spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-DOM-Level-2-2307/
Zope http://www.zope.org
 
contact:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



Installing XMLDocument beta
---

  This document describes installing XMLDocument beta on Unix.

Important Notes

  XMLDocument requires 4DOM which is covered by the ZDOM
  installation. Simply installing ZDOM should resolve this dependency

  XMLDocument also requires 4XPath and 4XSLT

  You can download the rpms from here:

  
ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/mirrors/python4linux/redhat/i386/4XPath-0.9.0-1.i386.rpm
  ftp://ftp.fourthought.com/pub/mirrors/python4linux/redhat/i386/4XSLT-0.9.0-1.i386.rpm
  

Installing

  Download these files from our FTP server (ftp.fourthought.com):

/pub/4Zope/XMLDocument/XMLDocument-beta.tgz
/pub/4Zope/XMLDocument/XMLImporter-beta.tgz

  Installing XMLDocument and XSLTMethod:

decompress XMLDocument-beta.tgz to your Zope directory

  Installing Demonstration:

Import the  testfolder.zexp file in $Zopeinstalldir$/Extensions.
Point your browser to where you imported testfolder in the zope heirarchy
and follow the directions.

NOTE:  The demonstration cyclicaly creates and destroys a ZDOM
heirarchy in testfolder/, so if you stop it at mid point it may break
if you try to restart it (if it's broken run the reset DTML Method:
which simply removes folder1, folder2, and ZDOMtester)

  Installing XMLImporter:

decompress XMLImporter-beta.tgz to an arbitrary directory.

make sure (Zope install directory)/lib/python is in your PYTHONPATH

* read the python files in test_suite for examples on how to use XMLImporter

  Assuming you've satisfied the dependencies, you should be done!

  questions? email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RELEASE NOTES
5/30/2000

1) Solved __call__ problem, XSLTMethods can be invoked programatically
2) Added a default view for XMLDocuments that can return the XML as:
  syntax highlighted HTML
  raw XML
  plain text
  this can be specified by the output property
3) fixed the copy paste bug
4) added demonstration/example to package

5/16/2000
Moved ClobXMLDocument and XSLTMethod to seperate products
changed ClobXMLDocument to XMLDocument


___
XMLDocument beta supports the import and manipulation of XML files in
Zope through the use of XSLT.
See (XPath:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-19991116, and XSLT:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xslt-19991116)

XMLImporter is currently used as a python based tool to input XML files
as Zope Objects.  The mapping functionality and XSLT transform are used to
manipulate the incomming XML stream into a set of Zope Objects.  The
transform is applied to the incoming XML to allow manipulation and
compression of the incomming XML.
See
http://216.164.72.7:7780/Wiki/Members/jim/ZDOM/InitialNotes
under the heading optimization.  The final set of objects created by XMLImporter
is defined by the mapping dictionary where keys are the tagNames to be
created, and the values are references to python classes.  A current limitation
of the system is that Zope must not be running during an import.

Clob XML Document is a Zope Object that represents a complete XML
document.  Interfaces are provided to edit the content of the document, and modify
how the document is displayed when viewed.  XSLTMethod is a Zope Object that applies 
an XSLT transform to an
object.  An XSLTMethod can be accessed as any other method of an object.  With the
ZDOM pakage installed, the XSLTMethod can be 

Re: [Zope-dev] Memory 2.1.4-2.1.6 a.k.a. how to get objects out of the cache

2000-05-30 Thread Bill Anderson

Jason Spisak wrote:
 
 Bill Anderson:
 
  Jason Spisak wrote:
 
  [...]
 
   That's funny that I am experienceing the same symptoms as you, but my
   installation is totally different. I'm not using GUF, or any DA's, and I'm
   running on RH 6.1.  We really need to figure this out as a community.  I am
   willing to try just about anything short of shipping my machine somewhere
   off premisis. ;)
 
 
  Ok, let's dig up some more info ( or perhaps I missed it ).
 
  Server setup, as in pcgi/Zserver/Apache w/proxypass, etc?
 
 Nothing but straight ZServer/Medusa.

Cool, eliminates suspects.
 
  Compiled on the machine, or binary distribution?
 
 
  Zope 2.1.1 binary distro. Not sure how it got to be 2.1.4/2.1.6, might
 have been the other person having problems, or my mistake.  But the changes
 in 2.1.4 and 2.1.6 aren't anything in the Object publisher or Medusa so I
 don't think it makes a difference.

Have you considered trying a source-compile setup? There may have been
something in the original binary that gets triggered when dynamically
linking (does it do that? I haven't run a binary Zope distribution) to
the libraries on your machine.

I have witnessed this with X.

 RH 6.1
 2.2.12smp kernel
 Hardware RAID
 dual 350mhz Xenon
 1 gig ram
 
 Vanilla Zope with no DA's, no Apache.
 
 BTW, Matthew gave me some advice last Friday to use the setcheckinterval
 line in z2.py and the performance gains are quite impressive.  Anyone who
 is running smp should try it.

It is impressive. I love seing Zope serving static files in the 70rps
range.

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] New Help System in 2.2

2000-05-30 Thread Jimmie Houchin

I too agree the new help system looks nice.

I was considering at one point jumping up and writing a documentation
system for Python/Zope. Unfortunately my notes, not many, are at work.
But some things I had in mind were based on something like JavaDoc. I am
not a Java expert and have not really used JavaDoc much but have seen
some of its documentation.

I was thinking it would be nice to have a parser which could extract
documentation from source to create external documentation files which
could be generated into multiple formats, html, xml, etc. I would have
needed to create a documentation format which could be used in source
but extracted. I was not going to use docstrings as they are intended
for a different purpose and are compiled into the bytecode.

I was thinking that the parser could run over a module and extract
functions, methods, variables and properties, etc. and create a stub
framework on a form. A documenter could then edit documentation for any
or all of the methods, save and it would be inserted appropriately into
source.

I thought it would also be nice if the documentation tree would also
parallel the source tree and have a corresponding colorized html
rendering of the module for browsing. This way one could jump from
documentation to source at will.

I was basically making idea notes. I was going to look at the current
doc generating and py2html tools available first. Then Starship went
down and I couldn't access them. :(

I also wanted to see what the DC team was doing.

I think it would be nice to see some ideas and processes for what and
how Amos and Michel are doing with the documentation and how the
community can help.

Just some thoughts.

Jimmie Houchin


Jason Spisak wrote:
 
 Shane Hathaway writes:
 
  Jason Spisak wrote:
   I was just browsing the help system and can I just say it is terrfic.  The
   .py files especially.  Not that python isn't that easy to read, but having
   the ZQR type stuff handy online is a huge win.  Is that stuff updated from
   the source on the fly?
 
  Almost.  It's actually written in separate files that mirror the
  structure of the real source.  And I'd like to bring up the point that
  I wonder why it is written that way.  Wouldn't it make more sense to
  self-document the source?
 
  If the issue is that some methods shouldn't be callable from a URL,
  there are better solutions to that problem (this is written to DC
  mainly):
 
 Is this the reason that it's not pulling the docs from the source?
 That's not a good idea.  With all the effort that Michel put in to work
 around not documenting in the source, he could have fixed it so that it
 pulled the docs from the source on the fly without effecting the URL
 access.
 
  1) Enahnce the permissions system to include "Accessible via HTTP",
  "Accessible via FTP", etc.
  2) Use an underscore as the first character of a docstring to indicate
  a non-URL-callable method.
 
 
 I just looked at it and that seems like doing work twice.  Why not just
 document your source?
 
 Wonderingly,
 
 Jason Spisak
 CIO
 HireTechs.com
 6151 West Century Boulevard
 Suite 900
 Los Angeles, CA 90045
 P. 310.665.3444
 F. 310.665.3544
 
 Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
 address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
 permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
 result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
 repeats.
 
 ___
 Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
 **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
 (Related lists -
  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] New Help System in 2.2

2000-05-30 Thread Jason Spisak

Stephan Richter writes:

 At 09:09 PM 5/30/00 +, Jason Spisak wrote:
 Shane Hathaway writes:
 
   Jason Spisak wrote:
I was just browsing the help system and can I just say it is 
  terrfic.  The
.py files especially.  Not that python isn't that easy to read, but 
  having
the ZQR type stuff handy online is a huge win.  Is that stuff updated 
  from
the source on the fly?
  
   Almost.  It's actually written in separate files that mirror the
   structure of the real source.  And I'd like to bring up the point that
   I wonder why it is written that way.  Wouldn't it make more sense to
   self-document the source?
  
   If the issue is that some methods shouldn't be callable from a URL,
   there are better solutions to that problem (this is written to DC
   mainly):
 
 Is this the reason that it's not pulling the docs from the source?
 That's not a good idea.  With all the effort that Michel put in to work
 around not documenting in the source, he could have fixed it so that it
 pulled the docs from the source on the fly without effecting the URL
 access.
 
   1) Enahnce the permissions system to include "Accessible via HTTP",
   "Accessible via FTP", etc.
   2) Use an underscore as the first character of a docstring to indicate
   a non-URL-callable method.
  
 
 I just looked at it and that seems like doing work twice.  Why not just
 document your source?
 
 I just talked to Amos and Michel last Friday about that and they researched 
 for a long time, whether it would be better to document the source or to 
 have different files. They both decided it is the best to have the 
 documentation separately. I believe that they looked at the issue from all 
 angles and had good reasons, why they went with the current way.

I trust them implicitly.  I'm sure that my gut reaction was probably the
same one they had, but after careful thought they found a better solution.

 Furthermore, the help system will become even more than just the screen 
 help. The .py files you see, are just the start of the new API 
 documentation. 

Oooo.

Furthermore, we will include a new DTML reference soon. Do 
 you know about anything else, that should be included?

Well if you really want to make it hot, the examples that are in there can
keep coming.  Web links might not be out of order either.  The only problem
is that there is no difinitive Zope online docs to link to, to get the most
recent info.  But when there is, it would be nice to include.

Thanks,

Jason Spisak
CIO
HireTechs.com
6151 West Century Boulevard
Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90045
P. 310.665.3444
F. 310.665.3544

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] New Help System in 2.2

2000-05-30 Thread Jason Spisak

Stephan Richter writes:

 At 12:02 AM 5/31/00 +, Jason Spisak wrote:
  Furthermore, we will include a new DTML reference soon. Do
   you know about anything else, that should be included?
 
 Well if you really want to make it hot, the examples that are in there can
 keep coming.  Web links might not be out of order either.  The only problem
 is that there is no difinitive Zope online docs to link to, to get the most
 recent info.  But when there is, it would be nice to include.
 
 The next task after the 2.2 release is that we will look through the 
 tutorial and see what it does not cover and then add the missing examples 
 in tutorial form. :)
 Off-site links are okay, but what happens, if I sit in the plane and I need 
 that piece. Amos leans also towards external links I think, but I would 
 rather keep it in the distribution; it is only a couple thousand bytes more 
 and will not increase the distro size too much.
 
 A fact is, that most of the Zope Online Help should be the most up-to-date, 
 meaning that we try to encourage developers to update and patch the help 
 system as they update the code.

Personally, I see that same thing might happen that happened to Zope. 
They'll want to get the product out badly, and since the help system is
separate, they'll put it off.  

 Our goal is basically to initialize a good, 
 well organized Zope help system, which content is maintained by the 
 developers, read community.
 

I think this is terrific shot at offering everyone a chance to "get it".

 BTW, if you find any mistakes or want to make additions to the help texts, 
 please send them to me. I hope I will be able to upload a complete revision 
 of *all* the help screens by the end of the week. I have only 80 documents 
 to go. :)

Excellent. I am reading it.  I founfa few "not found"'s but that stuff
probably just not loaded yet.


Jason Spisak
CIO
HireTechs.com
6151 West Century Boulevard
Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90045
P. 310.665.3444
F. 310.665.3544

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] New Help System in 2.2

2000-05-30 Thread Stephan Richter


Excellent. I am reading it.  I founfa few "not found"'s but that stuff
probably just not loaded yet.

Yeah, me too. I am fixing that as I am going along.

Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU - Physics and Chemistry
Web2k - Web Design/Development  Technical Project Management


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )




Re: [Zope-dev] Re: ZCatalog and Unique IDs

2000-05-30 Thread Tres Seaver

Chris Withers wrote:
 
 Tres Seaver wrote:
   who's the CTO?
 
  Jim is.
 
 Okay, I get the joke now :-)
 
   * "persistent" references are effectively required to be immortal:
  it is _mandated_ that one be able to stringify the IOR, copy it
 to a piece of paper, put the paper in a bottle, and cast it on
 the waves;  whoever opens the bottle should be able to transcribe
 the IOR, reify the reference from the string, and communicate with
 the object (which may be an entirely new "incarnation" created
 just for this request).
 
 This is the sort of persistent reference I meant, it's one of the
 reasons I like CORBA as a model ;-)
 
  A general-purpose, persistable reference in Zope pretty much has to
  be represented as an absolute containment path
 
 I don't agree. What happens when you move an object? The object doesn't
 change so why should its persistent reference? In a similar way, what
 happens when an object moves between storages? I reckon it should have
 the same POID...

What you are missing in my description above is that CORBA persistent
IORs
may not map one-for-one to "real" objects -- there may be many IOR's
whose
requests are served by a single "real" object.  Persistent IORs encode a
promise that, if I come back and invoke on the IOR I got from the
bottle,
the ORB which published it must do one of the following:

 * locate / activate the corresponding servant object and delegate to
it;

 * return to my ORB a LOCATION_FORWARD message pointing to the place
   whither it moved;

 * raise a NOT_EXIST exception if the object has died and can't be
   resurrected.

CORBA IOR's can actually consist of multiple "profiles" each of which
encodes
a "search path" to find the object:

 * "endpoint" data -- address information with which to establish a
   connection to the POA (persistent object adapter) e.g., hostname/IP
   + port # for TCP, or pathname for AF_LOCAL sockets;

 * "POA ID" -- a (possibly hierarchical) name for the object adapter
   which published the IOR;

 * "object key" -- the ID for the object, unique *within the POA*.

Zope objects already have an OID which is unique within their storage;
the problem is that there is no useful way to massage an object given
only
its OID;  lots of Zope's machinery depends on knowing the traversal path
used to find it.

 
  A man with one watch knows what time it is;  A man with two is never sure.
 
 That's not quite what I meant... An object is unique. It's aquisition
 context may give it more attributes to play with, but at the end of the
 day it is a seperate entity. This entity should have a unique, global
 identifier; it's POID.

 I think putting a path in front of this identifies the context, but
 doesn't really do a lot to identify the object.
 
 I guess my view depends on _data_ being stored in the object rather than
 acquired. Is this the case?

The traversal path encodes more than just acquired attributes.  For
instance,
it is entirely possible for a single object to be stored in multiple
folders:  in one folder, tseaver might not even be able to *see* the
object,
while in another, I might be able to query or modify it, based on the
local roles assigned in each folder.  (Note that this can't be done
through
the stock management interface, but could be done easily in
"file-system"
Python).

Tres.
-- 
===
Tres Seaver[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Creations"Zope Dealers"http://www.zope.org

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )