Re: [Zope-dev] List of packages in ZTK

2009-07-05 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 13:31 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Christian Theune wrote: > > > I took the Zope 3.4 KGS, removed the obvious packages that do not belong > > to the ZTK out of the list and created a home for the master list that > > de

Re: [Zope-dev] List of packages in ZTK

2009-07-05 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 11:14 +0200, Tobias Rodäbel wrote: > Hi, > > On 05.07.2009, at 07:06, Lennart Regebro wrote: > > > 2009/7/5 Stephan Richter : > >> To be honest, I am very disappointed by this list. It is totally > >> meaningless > >> to me since it does not represent any list with wh

Re: [Zope-dev] utilities and python version in zope2.12

2009-07-05 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonas Meurer wrote: > Hello, > > I just recognized that lots of utilities in zope2.12 still do have > python2.4 as interpreter while the release notes of zope2.12 talk about > python2.5 and python2.6 being the only supported python versions. True, bu

Re: [Zope-dev] List of packages in ZTK

2009-07-05 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lennart Regebro wrote: > 2009/7/5 Tres Seaver : >> BFG-the-framework uses the "bicycle seat toolkit" (zope.interface, >> zope.component, and dependencies). > > Fun name. Any reason for calling it this instead of the ZCA? Except > that it's obviously a

[Zope-dev] utilities and python version in zope2.12

2009-07-05 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hello, I just recognized that lots of utilities in zope2.12 still do have python2.4 as interpreter while the release notes of zope2.12 talk about python2.5 and python2.6 being the only supported python versions. greetings, jonas ___ Zope-Dev maillist

Re: [Zope-dev] List of packages in ZTK

2009-07-05 Thread Lennart Regebro
2009/7/5 Tres Seaver : > BFG-the-framework uses the "bicycle seat toolkit" (zope.interface, > zope.component, and dependencies). Fun name. Any reason for calling it this instead of the ZCA? Except that it's obviously are funnier? :-) -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.w

Re: [Zope-dev] How to test changes to ZTK packages?

2009-07-05 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Cook wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 14:35 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: > >> While I know that Mac people often report problems building lxml, I >> never have issues building lxml on Linux: the '--static-deps' option is >> a sufficient workaround for

Re: [Zope-dev] How to test changes to ZTK packages?

2009-07-05 Thread Tim Cook
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 14:35 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: > While I know that Mac people often report problems building lxml, I > never have issues building lxml on Linux: the '--static-deps' option is > a sufficient workaround for variants with too-old versions of libxml2 / > libxslt. I do not know

Re: [Zope-dev] List of packages in ZTK

2009-07-05 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lennart Regebro wrote: > 2009/7/5 Tobias Rodäbel : >> I'd like to mention repoze.bfg here. It takes a fairly small set of >> zope.* packages. > > Sure. Nothing says you have to use *all* ZTK packages either. It's a > collection of packages for buildi

Re: [Zope-dev] List of packages in ZTK

2009-07-05 Thread Lennart Regebro
2009/7/5 Lennart Regebro : > Maybe I stretch the word too much, but I would almost say > that BFG isn't dependent on ZTK, but just on the Zope Component > Architecture. (Which of course doesn't the ZTK from being useful in writing BFG apps. Just not REQUIRED.) -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Pl

Re: [Zope-dev] List of packages in ZTK

2009-07-05 Thread Lennart Regebro
2009/7/5 Tobias Rodäbel : > I'd like to mention repoze.bfg here. It takes a fairly small set of > zope.* packages. Sure. Nothing says you have to use *all* ZTK packages either. It's a collection of packages for building web frameworks. BFG is amazingly minimalistic and will by itself only include

Re: [Zope-dev] List of packages in ZTK

2009-07-05 Thread Tobias Rodäbel
Hi, On 05.07.2009, at 07:06, Lennart Regebro wrote: > 2009/7/5 Stephan Richter : >> To be honest, I am very disappointed by this list. It is totally >> meaningless >> to me since it does not represent any list with which I can build >> even a >> fairly simple application today. There is not a