Re: [Zope-dev] Developer meeting on IRC in #zope today at 15:00 UTC

2010-06-14 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

On 06/08/2010 09:18 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
 Hi,

 it's time again. See the attached agenda.

Better late then never, here's the info from last weeks meeting:

- ZTK 3.4.1 seems to be done (RC needs to be turned into final)

- Funding for Windows VM is there, Adam is building a tool for
   automatically building binary eggs when packages are released

- On the meta side: the last weeks had fewer participants than before
   which could be due to the topics stalling with maintenance tasks.
   We'll try to give better opportunity to bring up topics by inviting
   for the meeting already on Monday and making it clear that we
   don't have to stick with the topics from the draft agenda.

The full summary will be available here:
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/zope-dev/zope-dev-20100608.html

Cheers,
Christian

-- 
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh  co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Developer meeting in IRC tomorrow at 15:00 UTC

2010-06-14 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

I'd like to invite to the next developer meeting on IRC (#z...@freenode) 
which happens tomorrow at 15:00 UTC.

If you have anything you'd like to talk about, please feel free too send 
a topic suggestion in response to this post: it's really intended to be 
a platform for anyone of us to get itches scratched, so I want *you* to 
speak up. :)

If nothing else comes up, we'll keep following up on the test runners 
and how to get some metrics for bug days.

Christian

-- 
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh  co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 36 OK, 10 Failed

2010-06-14 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Jun 13 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Jun 14 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 46 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 12 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct 
at gocept.com, 27 from jdriessen at thehealthagency.com.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 470 projects
From: ct at gocept.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 21:13:08 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015237.html

Subject: FAILED : BlueBream template / Python2.6.4 32bit linux
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Sun Jun 13 22:00:55 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015245.html

Subject: FAILED : BlueBream template / Python2.5.2 32bit linux
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Sun Jun 13 22:00:57 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015246.html

Subject: FAILED : BlueBream template / Python2.7b2 32bit linux
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Sun Jun 13 22:00:57 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015247.html

Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 32bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Sun Jun 13 23:33:08 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015248.html

Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.2 Linux 32bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Sun Jun 13 23:34:21 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015249.html

Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.4 Linux 32bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Sun Jun 13 23:34:28 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015250.html

Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4.1 KGS / Python2.4.6 32bit linux
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Mon Jun 14 00:00:16 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015251.html

Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / ztk_win slave-win
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Mon Jun 14 02:31:52 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015256.html

Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / ztk_win slave-win
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Mon Jun 14 07:25:30 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015262.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 08:48:01 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015218.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 08:55:36 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015219.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / ztk slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 09:24:43 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015220.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 09:33:52 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015221.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu64
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 11:55:09 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015222.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu32
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 11:55:17 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015223.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu64
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 11:57:04 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015224.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu32
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 11:57:18 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015225.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 12:02:01 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015226.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 12:09:32 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015227.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu64
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 12:55:11 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015228.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu32
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 12:55:16 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015229.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 13:01:45 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015230.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu64
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Sun Jun 13 13:55:08 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015231.html

Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu32
From: 

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 36 OK, 10 Failed

2010-06-14 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


 Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 32bit
 From: ccomb at free.fr
 Date: Sun Jun 13 23:33:08 EDT 2010
 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015248.html
 
 Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.2 Linux 32bit
 From: ccomb at free.fr
 Date: Sun Jun 13 23:34:21 EDT 2010
 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015249.html
 
 Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.4 Linux 32bit
 From: ccomb at free.fr
 Date: Sun Jun 13 23:34:28 EDT 2010
 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015250.html

These apparent test failures are due to the following problem in the
buildout step, which did not cause the step to fail:


-  $ --
Installing test-zopeapp.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.locales'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.folder'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.error'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.publisher'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.principalannotation'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.server'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.http'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.dependable'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.broken'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.locking'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.pagetemplate'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.form'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.intid'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.container'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.interpreter'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.interface'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.basicskin'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.publication'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.wsgi'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.testing'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.zopeappgenerations'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.ftp'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.localpermission'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.schema'.
Generated script
'/home/ccomb/slave3/Python2.6.4-Linux-32bit/build/bin/test-zopeapp-zope.app.tree'.
While:
  Installing test-zopeapp.
  Getting distribution for 'zope.preference'.
Error: Picked: zope.preference = 3.8.0
program finished with exit code 0
-  $ --

That egg needs to be called out in the zopeapp.cfg file, I think (wasn't
it just spun out of zope.app.preference?)


Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkwWMVcACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6CvgCgqEB0cxwOqTkbVnTu3vrEe5u6
+2MAnRZGZBGe+etJ9jDUivYVXDDb7vMI
=hWo7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.13 - next steps

2010-06-14 Thread Jonas Meurer
hello,

On 13/06/2010 Hanno Schlichting wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org wrote:
  another build system would be magnificent :-)
 
  the new build system in zope2.12 makes it hard/impossible to distribute
  zope2 binaries within linux/*bsd/hurd/... distributions. so far no
  distribution i know contains zope2.12, and the most obvious reason is
  the new build system.
 
 In the Zope community we have decided to stop maintaining our own
 build infrastructure, as we simply do not have the resources to do so.
 Getting this right in a cross platform manner including Windows is no
 small task and there's no general open-source build infrastructure
 that provides this. Therefor we have decided to go with a language
 specific build infrastructure in the form of distutils and its
 extension setuptools / distribute.
 
 Personally I think this has been the right choice for us and has
 triggered a new interest in distutils. distutils2 is the latest
 offspring of that effort and is making good progress. Better
 integration into operating system package managers is one of the main
 focus areas of that effort. While solving these issues on the Python
 language level takes more time, it ultimately is the better approach.
 
  thus i suggest to either provide monolithic tarballs which do contain
  the debendencies, or change release policy for the dependencies to not
  break backwards compability with every minor release.
 
 I consider packaging up individual Python distributions as individual
 system packages as a flawed approach. The specific dependencies on
 exact versions of these distributions for any given application are
 too diverse for this approach to make much sense. The number of
 releases is so frequent and the stability requirements so different
 from system packages, that this just isn't a good match.
 
 If I were to package anything as a system package, then it would be
 one big package for something like CMFDefault, Plone or Zenoss as an
 application or one package for a custom developed application.
 zc.sourcerelease is one approach to help in this task for a
 zc.buildout based application.

first, thanks for clarifying. did i get you right, that for the future,
monolithic source releases of zope2 are planned again once the dust has
settled?

and second, does documentation exist which explains how to craft a
monolithic tarball with zc.sourcerelease in order to build zope2.12
without network access? i still didn't get the picture regarding
buildout, and thus don't understand zc.sourcerelease either :-/

greetings,
 jonas


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.13 - next steps

2010-06-14 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi.

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org wrote:
 first, thanks for clarifying. did i get you right, that for the future,
 monolithic source releases of zope2 are planned again once the dust has
 settled?

No. There is currently no monolithic released planned at all.

Only if someone does all the work of automating such a release, engage
with the community to discuss the approach and is willing to adjust to
community feedback, only then I as the release manager might make
those steps part of the release process. I'm not aware of anyone who
has shown even remote interest in this task.

 and second, does documentation exist which explains how to craft a
 monolithic tarball with zc.sourcerelease in order to build zope2.12
 without network access? i still didn't get the picture regarding
 buildout, and thus don't understand zc.sourcerelease either :-/

I'm not aware of any specific documentation. www.buildout.org and the
distutils-sig mailing list [1] would be the appropriate places to
look.

Hanno

[1] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.13 - next steps

2010-06-14 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jonas Meurer wrote:
 hello,
 
 On 13/06/2010 Hanno Schlichting wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org wrote:
 another build system would be magnificent :-)

 the new build system in zope2.12 makes it hard/impossible to distribute
 zope2 binaries within linux/*bsd/hurd/... distributions. so far no
 distribution i know contains zope2.12, and the most obvious reason is
 the new build system.
 In the Zope community we have decided to stop maintaining our own
 build infrastructure, as we simply do not have the resources to do so.
 Getting this right in a cross platform manner including Windows is no
 small task and there's no general open-source build infrastructure
 that provides this. Therefor we have decided to go with a language
 specific build infrastructure in the form of distutils and its
 extension setuptools / distribute.

 Personally I think this has been the right choice for us and has
 triggered a new interest in distutils. distutils2 is the latest
 offspring of that effort and is making good progress. Better
 integration into operating system package managers is one of the main
 focus areas of that effort. While solving these issues on the Python
 language level takes more time, it ultimately is the better approach.

 thus i suggest to either provide monolithic tarballs which do contain
 the debendencies, or change release policy for the dependencies to not
 break backwards compability with every minor release.
 I consider packaging up individual Python distributions as individual
 system packages as a flawed approach. The specific dependencies on
 exact versions of these distributions for any given application are
 too diverse for this approach to make much sense. The number of
 releases is so frequent and the stability requirements so different
 from system packages, that this just isn't a good match.

 If I were to package anything as a system package, then it would be
 one big package for something like CMFDefault, Plone or Zenoss as an
 application or one package for a custom developed application.
 zc.sourcerelease is one approach to help in this task for a
 zc.buildout based application.
 
 first, thanks for clarifying. did i get you right, that for the future,
 monolithic source releases of zope2 are planned again once the dust has
 settled?

No such plans exist.  Your desire for a network-free install needs to be
backed up by some work, as none of the core developers have that goal.

 and second, does documentation exist which explains how to craft a
 monolithic tarball with zc.sourcerelease in order to build zope2.12
 without network access? i still didn't get the picture regarding
 buildout, and thus don't understand zc.sourcerelease either :-/

A casual browse of the zc.sourcerelease page on PyPI yields:

http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.sourcerelease#creating-source-releases-from-buildouts



Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkwWQzsACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ5oTwCeOGZHOldy6fOZblczsbZ9rJtq
iKIAn0lzIXtgFqb2jrPu1yo7RE4KqzN7
=Hsxl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.13 - next steps

2010-06-14 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi there,

thanks to all of you for the feedback. Given the general agreement to
the plan, I'm going to release a first alpha on Friday June 25.

More alpha releases will follow depending on the changes that go into
the codebase. But I expect them on a roughly 3-4 weeks basis. If the
code stays as stable as it is and no new major features come in, I
expect to release a first beta in early September, in time for the
German Zope User Group conference.

The concrete plan up to the final will be decided once we get a beta
out of the door.

Thanks all,
Hanno

On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
 Aim for having a Zope 2.13 release in time for Plone 4.1, get a first
 alpha release out by the end of the month or early July. We can have
 more alpha releases during the summer, a beta probably around the
 zope-dev summit / German Zope User Group conference in early
 September.
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )