t;
> Any hints or does somebody know a framework which supports such
> an implementation?
Hi Roger
Here's a hint I've been looking at. Maybe it will give you some ideas.
http://ajaxpatterns.org/Direct_Login
- Jim Washington
___
Zope-
s and utilities by using zope.component
and zope.interface. :)
zif.sedna (newly beta2 in pypi) now has instructions for using its zope3
database adapter with repoze.tm in pylons.
- Jim Washington
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
full XPath!) interface to Sedna.
Anyway, Chris, any pointers on interfaces and configuration would be
very much appreciated.
-Jim Washington
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HT
ld work in Fedora
Core 3. I have no experience with Fedora, but it is probably worth a
try. I did not have to do anything special.
-Jim Washington
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross pos
weird enough (and perhaps merely a beta issue) that I
could not decide the proper category in the bug collector or even what
to search on to see if it had been reported previously.
So, consider this an FYI should anyone want to take a stab at fixing it
or reporting
Your idea of does have merit IMHO. Should the ZMI really
assume existence of anything other than "id" for objects?
-- Jim Washington
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** N
Toby Dickenson wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:16:35 -0400, Jim Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>2. If we want to get fancy about allowing authentication using that ip
>>address like naked ZServers can do,
>>
>
>>to
>>
>>if request
list of machines, even through a squid or
apache proxy. Essentially add a third thing to have besides username
and password. Which I still think is better than just username and
password, since Zope sees only *one* ip address coming from squid in the
current situation. I'll have to do some mor
hese changes might do there. I do not have check-in
privileges, and probably should not until I get a better clue of how cvs
works :).
Anyway, here is the code FWIW. Apologies that it is not a patch per se.
Now looking for a more clueful sponsor to take it from here to check-in
(after vet
mes, saying 'memory could not be "read".'
-- Jim Washington
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.
where
the client browser is. I realize that other proxies do not always
follow the rules, etc., etc., but I think that using
HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR if not null would be better than a log full of
192.168.1.1.
Apologies if these have already been discussed under another heading.
-- Jim
t find that site now.
But this morning, I found something that might be better if you can
translate asp -> python. http://coveryourasp.com/ValidateEmail.asp
YMMV.
-- Jim Washington
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/
Would it be smart to include the python header files in the zope binary
distributions? That would seem to solve a few problems for the
individuals using them.
-- Jim Washington
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Zope] Python 2.1 for debian ?
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 12:51:37
Michel Pelletier wrote:
>On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:16:51 -0400
> Jim Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Hi, All
>>
>>Since the Collector is down, where do we send patches if we are not
>>cvs-authorized? I just discovered a not-too-clever hack t
Hi, All
Since the Collector is down, where do we send patches if we are not
cvs-authorized? I just discovered a not-too-clever hack to make the
Find tab recurse through methods of Z Classes, which the margin of this
e-mail is too small to contain.
-- Jim Washington
. It came
from the Field class. Use it. You may name it "FieldBasic" if you
wish.
Regards,
-- Jim Washington
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding
I created un-attached
Persistent descendents on-the-fly while testing earlier? I presume they
garbage-collected away when I was done with them. Is this correct? I
have a nagging worry about ghost objects and the types of programming
errors that might create them.
--
Jim
17 matches
Mail list logo
