benchmarks with query plan and it didn't make any
noticeable difference.
What might be true or is becoming more likely is that indexes are used
where they don't fit the use case rather than that the indexes
themselves need optimisation.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http
site with 300,000 remember based users and
roughly 150,000 documents and images indexed.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo
|0.105|95165.88
getFullname |ZCTextIndex |0.104|95313.06
getRoles |FieldIndex |0.104|95385.31
getUserName |ZCTextIndex |0.103|96692.46
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roché Compaan wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 09:20 +0200, Hedley Roos wrote:
Have you measures the time needs for some standard ZCatalog queries
used with a Plone site
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:08 , Roché Compaan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
- Plone uses too many indexes, and in particular, uses multiple text
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:41 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:32 , Roché Compaan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
When it comes to integrating anything in Zope itself I'd choose the
latter
Hi Fabio
The funkload tests were project specific. I plan to write up my findings
and to do benchmarks on a standard Plone instance and blog about it.
This will unfortunately have to wait since I'm on holiday this week :-)
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 18:50 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
On 26.10.2008 18:43 Uhr, Roché Compaan wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 09:20 +0200, Hedley Roos wrote:
I suspect specific indexes are just performing suboptimally and needs to
be improved. ExtendPathIndex in Plone seems to be one
Where can one find Zope 3 catalog? Or is it simply zope.index?
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:44 -0700, Ross Patterson wrote:
Roché Compaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where can one find Zope 3 catalog? Or is it simply zope.index?
I think zope.app.catalog is what you're looking for.
Thanks. I was looking at the Zope 3 version distributed with Zope 2.10
which
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 20:01 +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote at 2007-9-18 08:55 +0200:
...
Sorry if I was unclear but what I'm really asking is if it is possible
to improve the conflict handling of the current indexes that we have in
Zope. I am also asking if concurrent
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 19:57 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roché Compaan wrote:
Hi there
Are the current indexing solutions that we have in Zope 2 and 3 the best
that we can have? Is there any way to improve the amount of concurrent
indexing
like to make the ZODB work
for me here.
Are there solutions here? Can one employ some of the QueueCatalog
conflict resolution strategies to make indexes more resilient? Or should
one use some locking strategy instead?
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http
)
!= next):
raise Unauthorized(name)
If you agree that his is a bug, I'll log it.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 09:48 +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote at 2007-2-23 22:00 +0200:
...
Thanks for that pointer. It's good that way, it should make invalidation
easier. It could be as simple as invalidating any cached result that
contains the documentId being indexed. Do
heavily on the catalog,
optimisation of catalog operations can surely help improving
scalability.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org
with a Plone site that is a heavy user of the catalog)
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 06:55 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote:
I'm curious, has anybody played around with the idea of caching ZCatalog
results and if I submitted a patch to do this would it be excepted?
I quickly coded some basic caching of results on a volatile attribute
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:09 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 06:55 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote:
I'm curious, has anybody played around with the idea of caching
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 20:43 +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote at 2007-2-23 18:44 +0200:
...
Cool idea. I haven't done any coding involving OFS.Cache though. Looking
at it briefly it looks like one can modify the catalog to subclass
OFS.Cacheable and then use the ZCacheable_get
that this
is communicated properly at release time.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding
basically boils down to figure out if the
user is allowed to access C or not.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 19:10 +0100, Max M wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote:
The rest of the discussion basically boils down to figure out if the
user is allowed to access C or not.
Hasn't it been raised allready that there is no way of knowing that?
A single method might be public
should guard access to its attributes.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 09:27 +0100, Max M wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote:
I'm unsure about the security check in the patch below - I copied the
way restrictedTraverse does it. I read through validate in the default
security policy but it is one of those methods where all the security
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 14:56 +, Chris Withers wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote:
+obj = self.aq_parent.unrestrictedTraverse(self.getPath(), None)
+if obj and securityManager.validate(obj, obj, None, None):
+return obj
+else:
+return None
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 19:36 +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote at 2005-3-3 09:53 +0200:
...
-return self.aq_parent.restrictedTraverse(self.getPath(), None)
+obj = self.aq_parent.unrestrictedTraverse(self.getPath(), None)
+if obj
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 21:06 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 20:21 Uhr +0100 Dieter Maurer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roché Compaan wrote at 2005-2-25 17:22 +0200:
Last year in March the following checkin was made that changed
ZCatalog's getObject to use
work because restrictedTraverse already
fails when traversing the 'documents' folder.
I would propose that getObject does an unrestrictedTraverse of the path
and then checks if the user has permission to access that the object.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http
Have a look at Archetypes, it does what you want.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/archetypes
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
Santi Camps wrote:
Hi all,
I've been developing database oriented applications for about 10 years,
using zope
Santi Camps wrote:
En/na Roché Compaan ha escrit:
Have a look at Archetypes, it does what you want.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/archetypes
I think you are talking about SQLStorage of Archetypes.
I was actually thinking of the implementation of References, which uses
the ZCatalog in manner
about writing
DA's but '_v_' attributes are *volatile* attributes and they are not
persisted, see http://zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/VolatileAttributes.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist
PersonObject.aq_base
rather than just PersonObject?
No, because the ZODB already strips acquisition wrappers - like Dieter
pointed out above. You only have to make sure that you wrap objects in
the original acquisition context when you retrieve them.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:50:56 -0400
Casey Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 30 September 2002 08:36 am, Roché Compaan wrote:
Don't know if this will help but these errors specifically occur with
'lines' properties with Keyword Indexes on them.
What is also significant
have thought that only unique values
should be stored in the index data.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:17:17 +0200
Jean Jordaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Our app has been hitting these errors for months:
2002
something with the namespace
that makes it impossible for the subsequent dtml-in tag to
find the getProxies method in the root.
Any ideas why?
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist
On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 18:31, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 11:45, Roché Compaan wrote:
[...]
dtml-in getProxies('Platform') sort=Name prefix=platform
This is not a valid syntax, you should have::
dtml-in getProxies('Platform') sort=Name prefix=platform
simply upgrade and my problem will go away :)
And it did! Just thought I'd mention this since I didn't find anything
in the collector about it.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist
) = f-f_stacksize' failed.
Any help will be much appreciated.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts
I have a ZPatterns application that uses the ZODB as storage. When I delete
an object only the name of the script that deleted the object is shown in
the Undo log. Is there any way to determine the ID of the object that was
deleted? Is there a way that one can get a handle on the object that
40 matches
Mail list logo
