Shane Hathaway wrote:
Michael Bernstein wrote:
Did I miss something? Did I just manage to embarrass myself? Is this a
dream where I find I am wearing nothing but underwear in public and
then wake up?
Well, OPE made me think of:
- Opie on The Andy Griffith Show - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053
On Friday 16 April 2004 03:24 pm, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> - Spelling it "zOPE" to take advantage of a frequent mishap involving
> the cAPS lOCK key
That must be what happened for zLOG, and I declared that dead. I don't think
anyone's ready for that for Zope 3 just yet. ;-)
-Fred
--
Fred
On Friday 16 April 2004 03:06 pm, Michael Bernstein wrote:
> Shouldn't we strive for consistency in nomenclature going forward?
Definately. My point was that we don't have anything to base it on, not that
we shouldn't be.
Zope 3 kindly specifies some guidelines for naming, including module and
Michael Bernstein wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
Hehe. ;-)
(I do hope you're joking!)
About even considering a 'wholesale moving and renaming' yes, obviously,
but as far as suggesting 'OPE' as an alternative to 'z' (insofar as it
is still necessary to avoid a name-clash with 'Zope'), no. 'OPE' (as
Fred Drake wrote:
On Friday 16 April 2004 01:31 pm, Michael Bernstein wrote:
> From a consistency in nomenclature POV, I find 'z' jars a bit with
> ZConfig, zdaemon, ZEO, zLog, and ZODB, which one might expect to find
> nested within 'z' (as 'z.Config' for example). This is admittedly only
>
Michael Bernstein wrote:
However, rather than suggest a wholesale moving and renaming of these
packages within 'z', I'd like to suggest an alternative short name for
the 'zope' package, 'OPE', which avoids this issue:
import OPE.interface
from OPE.app import zapi
from OPE.app.event import pub
On Friday 16 April 2004 01:31 pm, Michael Bernstein wrote:
> From a consistency in nomenclature POV, I find 'z' jars a bit with
> ZConfig, zdaemon, ZEO, zLog, and ZODB, which one might expect to find
> nested within 'z' (as 'z.Config' for example). This is admittedly only
> an issue for the ne
Jim Fulton wrote:
Based on recent discussions, I've created a proposal:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/RenameTheZopePackage
to rename the "zope" package to "z". Unless there are strong
objections, we'll do this after we move the Zope repository head to
subversion at the end of the month.
From a con
