I want to thank everyone who's participating in this
thread. The input is extremely valuable.
Garrett Smith wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
We don't. In fact, one could argue that adaptation is a bit like
a different kind of traversal. In fact, in Zope 3, we already have
a notion of this. In
Jim Fulton wrote:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| So far, I like:
| | foo/bar-dc/title
| | the best.
OTOH, for 'valid' xhtml, u would have to write:
You mean well-formed.
foo/bar-gt;dc/title
Totally defeating the purpose. One may argue that this would not be
part of the output, but it breaks the
Tres Seaver wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| So far, I like:
| | foo/bar-dc/title
| | the best.
OTOH, for 'valid' xhtml, u would have to write:
You mean well-formed.
foo/bar-gt;dc/title
Totally defeating the purpose. One may argue that this would not be
part of the output, but
Jim Fulton wrote:
IMO, if we take this route, we should think of the notation as
providing an alternate traversal operator. That is, there is
syntax that either modifies or replaces /, so of the examples
above, only:
context/*dc/title
In that case, I'd be happy to consider adaptation as
Evan Simpson wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
IMO, if we take this route, we should think of the notation as
providing an alternate traversal operator. That is, there is
syntax that either modifies or replaces /, so of the examples
above, only:
context/*dc/title
In that case, I'd be happy to consider
Jim Fulton wrote:
We don't. In fact, one could argue that adaptation is a bit like
a different kind of traversal. In fact, in Zope 3, we already have
a notion of this. In general, in Zope 3 paths, we can say:
foo/++namespace++name
where /++namespace++ can be thought of as a special form
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 03:55:23PM -0500, Garrett Smith wrote:
So, we could also use something like:
content/++adapter++dc/title
but I think people want something more concide for ZPT.
I prefer this notation, even though it's more verbose. I think it should
be supported along with
