On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 03:55:23PM -0500, Garrett Smith wrote: > > So, we could also use something like: > > > > content/++adapter++dc/title > > > > but I think people want something more concide for ZPT. > > I prefer this notation, even though it's more verbose. I think it should > be supported along with a short cut syntax. > > This problem seems analogous to view lookup -- > "content/++view++index.html" and "content/@@index.html" are equivalent. > > So, applied to adapters, we could use: > > content/++adapter++dc/title (or '++adapt++') > > one could use: > > content/##dc/title > > or perhaps (yuckier): > > content/**dc/title > > I'd hate to see Yet Another Traversal Syntax introduced when we already > have a decent pattern established.
I like this train of thought. Today I brainstormed content/::dc/title on IRC. I'm not entirely sure why, but adaptation and the ':' character seem to be related in my mind. Marius Gedminas -- Never be afraid to tell the world who you are. -- Anonymous
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )