Hi,
I found the solution for my problem:
There was a build folder under lib/python called build/lib/lib-i686-2.4/...
Don't know where it comes from. Maybe a wrong setup before current install
process.
Removing lib/python/build solved my problem.
Regards,
Dirk
--
Feel free – 10 GB Mailbox,
--On 14. Juli 2006 16:01:22 -0400 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
If there are no objections, I plan to release Zope 2.9.4 in about one
week (likely next Thu or Fri).
Note that the 2.9 branch depends at the moment
--On 15. Juli 2006 15:55:42 -0400 Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Tim]
I used tags for ZODB until I gave in to complaints about that, and
switched to using revision numbers. The real complaint about using a
tagged external is that when the tag changes, SVN isn't smart enough
to do an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 15. Juli 2006 15:55:42 -0400 Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Tim]
I used tags for ZODB until I gave in to complaints about that, and
switched to using revision numbers. The real complaint about using a
tagged
--On 14. Juli 2006 16:01:22 -0400 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
If there are no objections, I plan to release Zope 2.9.4 in about one
week (likely next Thu or Fri).
Even sooner would be fine with me. I plan to
Previously Andreas Jung wrote:
I think we should make another internal ZODB release. The current
svn:externals for the ZODB (and other modules) use a revision number
instead of a tag. This reminds me of some former discussion whether to use
revision numbers or tags...what was the result of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 14. Juli 2006 16:01:22 -0400 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
If there are no objections, I plan to release Zope 2.9.4 in about one
week
[Andreas Jung]
...
I think we should make another internal ZODB release. The current
svn:externals for the ZODB (and other modules) use a revision number
instead of a tag. This reminds me of some former discussion whether to use
revision numbers or tags...what was the result of this discussion.
--On 15. Juli 2006 15:21:20 -0400 Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The things people complain about sometimes astonish me -- just as the
things I complain about sometimes astonish others :-)
I used tags for ZODB until I gave in to complaints about that, and
switched to using revision
Previously Andreas Jung wrote:
What do you mean with when the tag changes? A tag IMO should *never*
change.
What he describes sounds like modifying svn:externals to point to a
different tag.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/
[Tim]
I used tags for ZODB until I gave in to complaints about that, and
switched to using revision numbers. The real complaint about using a
tagged external is that when the tag changes, SVN isn't smart enough
to do an incremental update. Instead, when you update after an
external tag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
If there are no objections, I plan to release Zope 2.9.4 in about one
week (likely next Thu or Fri).
Even sooner would be fine with me. I plan to release a 2.8.8 this
weekend with the changes for the ReST fix (I already
Tres Seaver wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
If there are no objections, I plan to release Zope 2.9.4 in about one
week (likely next Thu or Fri).
Even sooner would be fine with me. I plan to release a 2.8.8 this
weekend with the changes for the ReST fix (I already released a 2.7.9).
Note that
13 matches
Mail list logo
