On 03/04/2010 11:35 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
A thought that came up when reading this paragraph: another option
restructuring/grouping to reduce the amount of packages may be to join
smaller packages with weird
On 03/04/2010 04:13 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
* 2010-03-03 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote:
The ZTK was created in part to deal with instability issues arising from
people working on parts without testing the whole.
I suppose
Hi,
On 03/04/2010 10:44 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Weird. Tres' mail didn't make it into gmane ... I'll fold my replies to
Jim and Tres into this one mail. (Looks like I'm now turning into the
one making noise here. I'm already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Theune wrote:
On 03/04/2010 04:13 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
* 2010-03-03 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote:
The ZTK was created in part to deal with instability issues arising
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
* 2010-03-03 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote:
The ZTK was created in part to deal with instability issues arising from
people working on parts without testing the whole.
I suppose everybody here agrees that any change to a
Hello,
* 2010-03-04 09:22, Baiju M wrote:
I wonder whether we can split ztk.cfg zopeapp.cfg further logically ?
Something like zca.cfg , index.cfg, form.cfg, auth.cfg etc. ? May be we
will end up with one cfg file for each package :)
I don't think we need to split the cfg files: IMHO what
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
A thought that came up when reading this paragraph: another option
restructuring/grouping to reduce the amount of packages may be to join
smaller packages with weird boundaries into larger ones again. (Not that
I suggest
Hello,
Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 9:43:44 PM, you wrote:
JF Others, like me and Martijn and probably many many others, see the ZTK
JF as a set of packages that can be used in various subsets and
JF combination. We want as few dependencies as possible. We also want a
JF configuration of
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
A thought that came up when reading this paragraph: another option
restructuring/grouping to reduce the amount of packages may be to join
smaller
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
* 2010-03-03 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote:
The ZTK was created in part to deal with instability issues arising from
people working on parts without testing the whole.
I suppose everybody here agrees that any change to a
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
A thought that came up when reading this paragraph: another option
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Brian Sutherland
br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
In the specific case of zope.event, I'd prefer it stay separate. I
want developers to be able to publish events without having to commit
to a
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:19:52AM -0500, Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Brian Sutherland
br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
In the specific case of zope.event, I'd prefer it stay separate. I
want developers to be
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:19:52AM -0500, Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Brian Sutherland
br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
In the specific case of zope.event, I'd prefer it stay separate. I
want developers to be
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Brian Sutherland
br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:19:52AM -0500, Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Brian Sutherland
br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
In the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
* 2010-03-03 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote:
The ZTK was created in part to deal with instability issues arising from
people working on parts without testing
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
* 2010-03-03 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote:
The ZTK was created in part to deal with
One thing that makes problems like this really hard is that email is such
a terrible tool for much of the needed communication. It would be nice
if we could do something more sprinty. I don't want to help if it involves
drawn out email discussions, but, FWIW, I'd be willing to allocate some
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
* 2010-03-03 20:41, Chris McDonough wrote:
Why wouldn't that be worked out here? Is it because you just want the
mechanics of such a project done elsewhere without having to see it
talked about on this maillist? Or is
On 03/03/2010 09:43 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
* 2010-03-03 20:41, Chris McDonough wrote:
Why wouldn't that be worked out here? Is it because you just want the
mechanics of such a project done elsewhere without having to
* 2010-03-03 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote:
The ZTK was created in part to deal with instability issues arising from
people working on parts without testing the whole.
I suppose everybody here agrees that any change to a package which is part
of the ZTK *must* be tested against the whole ZTK. It
21 matches
Mail list logo
