On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:30:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2006-7-5 18:06 -0300:
| >...and then I find it. Phew :)
| >
| > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/8925
|
| But you see that this post does not compare local versus global
| access but "c
Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2006-7-5 18:06 -0300:
>...and then I find it. Phew :)
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/8925
But you see that this post does not compare local versus global
access but "cell reference in enclosing (!) scope" versus global access.
As my example proves
...and then I find it. Phew :)
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.devel/8925
--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com
Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:29:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| That would extremely surprise me:
|
| While global lookup was significantly optimized,
| it is still an lookup with a string as argument.
|
| For local lookup on the other hand, the compiler has
| turned the name into an
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2006-7-5 18:56 +0200:
>Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid:
> _getattr = getattr
> _none = None
> marker = _marker
>local namespace """optimizations""" that are found in
>unrestrictedTraverse?
Why do you think they were stupid?
They do
Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2006-7-5 16:45 -0300:
> ...
>It has been demonstrated in other lists that global lookups are most
>of the time faster than local lookups in recent versions of python.
That would extremely surprise me:
While global lookup was significantly optimized,
it is still an loo
--On 5. Juli 2006 16:45:21 -0300 Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:21:29PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
| > Does that mean you're for or against it?
| >
|
| For (of course) :-)
It has been demonstrated in other lists that global lookups are most
of the time
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:21:29PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
| >Does that mean you're for or against it?
| >
|
| For (of course) :-)
It has been demonstrated in other lists that global lookups are most
of the time faster than local lookups in recent versions of python.
--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfo
--On 5. Juli 2006 19:00:52 +0100 Tim Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid:
_getattr = getattr
_none = None
marker = _marker
local namespace """optimizations""" that are found in
unrestrictedTraverse?
I
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid:
_getattr = getattr
_none = None
marker = _marker
local namespace """optimizations""" that are found in unrestrictedTraverse?
I find these things rather confusing when looking at zope core code, and
al
--On 5. Juli 2006 19:11:16 +0200 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5 Jul 2006, at 19:05, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 5. Juli 2006 18:56:25 +0200 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid:
_getattr = getattr
_none =
On 5 Jul 2006, at 19:05, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 5. Juli 2006 18:56:25 +0200 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid:
_getattr = getattr
_none = None
marker = _marker
local namespace """optimizations""" that are foun
--On 5. Juli 2006 18:56:25 +0200 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid:
_getattr = getattr
_none = None
marker = _marker
local namespace """optimizations""" that are found in
unrestrictedTraverse?
I am pretty sure
Is anyone opposed to me removing the stupid:
_getattr = getattr
_none = None
marker = _marker
local namespace """optimizations""" that are found in
unrestrictedTraverse?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nu
14 matches
Mail list logo
