On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:38:16 +0100, Oliver Bleutgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Acquisition.ImplicitAcquirerWrapper: 42442
That class is used to glue together acquisition content chains. Being
top of the list indicates that you have been leaking an acquisition
context chain.
That doesnt mean t
Toby Dickenson wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:38:16 +0100, Oliver Bleutgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Acquisition.ImplicitAcquirerWrapper: 42442
>>
>
> That class is used to glue together acquisition content chains. Being
> top of the list indicates that you have been leaking an acquis
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:37:00 +0100, Oliver Bleutgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>- I did paste only the objects which have such a high count (next one
>was approx 200).
Hmm. Ill have to ponder what that means.
>- This server (2.3.3) has no special products on it, just 2 Folderish
>ZClasses, wh
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 05:08 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
>
>
> Matthew, thanks for taking the time to gdb the beast with me. Did you
> come up with any instrumentation I should add to Python or Zope to get
> what it is that Python is trying to resease twice? If you want, I can
> a
Andre Schubert schrieb:
>
> Andy McKay schrieb:
> >
> > Didnt Shane do a leak finder product that can help debug this?
> > http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh
>
> I will install the LeakFinder product on the server and look what
> happens
If have installed LeakFinder this morning and resta
Hello,
We also have the problem with zope crashing with segfault 11.
I've read al earlier posts on this subject, but couldn't notice anything
that could arrange a direct solution, or I should have missed something?
The only thing I can try is to describe our situation :
- We have a produc
One more question then I'll shut up ;-).
Toby Dickenson wrote:
>>Is there a description somewhere what the basic causes of such leakages
>>are? I.e. only bugs in python c-code/zope c-code?
>>
>
> No, its possible for a bug in through-the-web edited dtml to cause
> this.
Waah, this is the fir
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:46:27 +0100, Oliver Bleutgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Waah, this is the first time I hear that. That means that even if
>zope/python would be bug-free, it's possible to write dtml that causes a
>leak?
>Is there a (non-esoteric) example for that?
(untested, but the pri
The
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 10:05, Martijn Jacobs wrote:
> [...]
>
> I don't know where to start, because attaching GDB doesn't make any
> sense, since you have to start zope single threaded (according to Matts
> Stability Howto) and then no crashes occur.
Actually, at least in Linux, with a rec
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 09:09, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 05:08 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> >
> >
> > Matthew, thanks for taking the time to gdb the beast with me. Did you
> > come up with any instrumentation I should add to Python or Zope to get
> > what
I'm curious as to what is holding up Zope 2.5.1? 2.5.1b1 has been out for
quite a while now (in Zope time).
--andy.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(R
We are trying to get to the bottom of a few straggling
instability reports, so we're planning to go ahead with
a b2 as soon as we've either a) figured out and fixed them
b) figured them out and found it wasn't a Zope core problem
or c) decide that we can't make enough progress in a
reasonable time
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> Well, I have the energy, I just don't know where to start. But it's
> beginning to look like I'll just have to roll up my sleeves and dive in
> C code to hunt this beast down. And to think that I'd chosen Python as
> my official programming language to avoid just
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 13:04, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I just found out about something that might help. If you compiled
> against the GNU C library, you can set the environment variable
> MALLOC_CHECK_ to 1 to get malloc usage warnings printed to stderr, or
> set it to 2 to cause an abort() as
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 13:03, Brian Lloyd wrote:
> We are trying to get to the bottom of a few straggling
> instability reports, so we're planning to go ahead with
> a b2 as soon as we've either a) figured out and fixed them
> b) figured them out and found it wasn't a Zope core problem
> or c) deci
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 12:40, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> Also, how about turning on some flags in
> gc.seg_debug()? Do you think we might be able to glance something by
> seeing what objects where logged as freed or by storing them in
> gc.garbage?
Forgot to mention, gc module documentation
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 13:04, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
>>I just found out about something that might help. If you compiled
>>against the GNU C library, you can set the environment variable
>>MALLOC_CHECK_ to 1 to get malloc usage warnings printed to stderr, or
> > We are trying to get to the bottom of a few straggling
> > instability reports, so we're planning to go ahead with
> > a b2 as soon as we've either a) figured out and fixed them
> > b) figured them out and found it wasn't a Zope core problem
> > or c) decide that we can't make enough progress
> Actually, at least in Linux, with a recent gdb, you can attach gdb to
> zope in multithread mode. Just take the "-t 1" from the command line
> sugested by the StabilityHOWTO and you're set. Best results are achieved
> by compiling everything from source (python even, use the
> --prefix=/path/to
Hello,
I am very new to Zope/DTML and I am a little confused with the operation of
the DTML-IN statement. Here is the snippet of code
This code displays the contents 4 cells in a table
and the output is12(4,5,6)(7,8,9)I am a litte confused
because I though
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 14:04, Brian Lloyd wrote:
>
> The best way to help is to help get this (these) down to
> a minimal, reproducable test case.
The problem is, as far as I could check, the crashes all happen inside
the gc, which runs orthogonal to the requests, so getting a
reproduceable test
Hi Gary,
This question is more suited to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and you should not send html e-mail to any of these
two lists, but since we are here...
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 16:13, Gary Yee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am very new to Zope/DTML and I am a little confused with
I set MALLOC_CHECK_ to 1 and it said it was using the malloc debug
hooks, but didn't report anything else before the crashes, so no point
in setting it to 2...
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 13:49, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 13:04, Shane Hathaway wrot
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 12:04, Brian Lloyd wrote:
> - Absolutely eliminate SQL db access as a cause (it sounds
> like we have proof of this now)
This sounds like it is not specific to any DA. Is that the case?
--
Andy Dustman PGP: 0x930B8AB6
@ .net http://dustman.net
> > - Absolutely eliminate SQL db access as a cause (it sounds
> > like we have proof of this now)
>
> This sounds like it is not specific to any DA. Is that the case?
The only one I know of is the MySQL DA, but what I was
getting at here was that eliminating ANY sql db access
lets us d
On Wednesday, March 13, 2002, at 10:40 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
wrote:
>
> What about patching Python to report the freed objects like you
> mentioned on IRC? Also, how about turning on some flags in
> gc.seg_debug()? Do you think we might be able to glance something by
> seeing what objects
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 21:30, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, March 13, 2002, at 10:40 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
> wrote:
> >
> > What about patching Python to report the freed objects like you
> > mentioned on IRC? Also, how about turning on some flags in
> > gc.seg_debug()? Do you
27 matches
Mail list logo
