[Zope-dev] Re: State of the philikon-aq-and-__parent__ branch

2007-06-20 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Hanno Schlichting wrote: as some of you may have noticed I worked a bit more on philikon's branch which makes Acquisition and in return the Zope2 security machinery aware of __parent__ pointers. Yay, thanks Hanno! As I won't have much time to work on this anymore, I would encourage all of

[Zope-dev] State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-20 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4-integration branch? If not, I'd like to see it merged, now that ZODB 3.8 has beta'ed. -- http://worldcookery.com -- Professional Zope documentation and training ___ Zope-Dev maillist -

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-20 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 20. Juni 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4-integration branch? If not, I'd like to see it merged, now that ZODB 3.8 has beta'ed. The only outstanding issues are ZClasses. If we merge this branch

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations.

2007-06-20 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Stefan H. Holek wrote: Log message for revision 76597: Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations. ... @@ -130,7 +131,15 @@ if OFS.interfaces.IObjectManager.providedBy(ob): dispatchToSublocations(ob, event) [EMAIL PROTECTED](OFS.interfaces.IItem,

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-20 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
On 20 Jun 2007, at 12:20 , Andreas Jung wrote: --On 20. Juni 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4-integration branch? If not, I'd like to see it merged, now that ZODB 3.8 has beta'ed. The only

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-20 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 20. Juni 2007 12:29:29 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 20 Jun 2007, at 12:20 , Andreas Jung wrote: --On 20. Juni 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4-integration

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations.

2007-06-20 Thread Stefan H. Holek
I took my cues from how ObjectModifiedEvent is handled. I figured copied and moved should be treated the same. Also, there is this comment in OFS/subscribers.py: # The following subscribers should really be defined in ZCML # but we don't have enough control over subscriber ordering for #

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations.

2007-06-20 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
On 20 Jun 2007, at 13:16 , Stefan H. Holek wrote: I took my cues from how ObjectModifiedEvent is handled. I figured copied and moved should be treated the same. Also, there is this comment in OFS/subscribers.py: # The following subscribers should really be defined in ZCML # but we don't

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 5 OK

2007-06-20 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Jun 19 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Wed Jun 20 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Jun 19 20:50:46 EDT 2007

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: QuequeCatalog and GenericSetup

2007-06-20 Thread Joachim Schmitz
Tres Seaver schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joachim Schmitz wrote: Hi, We are now using the QueueCatalog as a replacement of the portal_catalog, and renamed the original portal_catalog to portal_catalog_real. In our local toolset.xml I definded required

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations.

2007-06-20 Thread Stefan H. Holek
This should of course have read: I took my cues from how *ObjectMovedEvent* is handled. On 20. Jun 2007, at 13:16, Stefan H. Holek wrote: I took my cues from how ObjectModifiedEvent is handled. I figured copied and moved should be treated the same. Also, there is this comment in