On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 10:22:13AM +0200, Charlie Clark wrote:
> I'll admit to spending most of my time on new CMF stuff but I did close
> two bugs that I felt comfortable with. Didn't seem anyone else was hanging
> around on IRC with bugfixing on their mind.
I saw your checkins (and mentally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/1/10 10:22 , Charlie Clark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll admit to spending most of my time on new CMF stuff but I did close
> two bugs that I felt comfortable with. Didn't seem anyone else was hanging
> around on IRC with bugfixing on their mind.
I
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:07:15AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Roman Joost wrote:
> > Thank you. I actually had troubles running all tests in zope.testrunner.
> > I need to check why to be sure, to avoid commiting something broken.
>
> Marius fixed the buildout for that.
It was actually my bad - I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roman Joost wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 07:59:18AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Roman, I landed my version of the fix in 'zope.testrunner', but didn't
>> touch it in 'zope.testing', since you were working on it. I was rushing
>> a little because
Hi Tres,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 07:59:18AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Roman, I landed my version of the fix in 'zope.testrunner', but didn't
> touch it in 'zope.testing', since you were working on it. I was rushing
> a little because I wanted to release 'zope.testrunner', but wanted to
> check
Casey Duncan wrote:
I will try to tread a little lighter on the Reject button and add a
comment requesting clarification regardless of age. If I don't hear any
for a month or so, then the bug will be closed.
Great, don't suppose you can do a mind-meld with Andreas and Maik and get that
point acros
On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:45:03 -0400
"Tim Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
> On the Python bug tracker, I don't close vague bug reports instantly.
> Instead I add a note, saying that unless more information is added,
> the bug will be closed a month later. It's rare that more info gets
> added
[Chris Withers]
> I feel compelled to scream "me too!" here. Closing a bug, even if
> anonymously or incompletely reported does not make Zope any better.
> See the recent case of a bug that was closed that was still an
> outstanding crash issue. Thankfully Tim managed to rescue that one.
While th
Dieter Maurer wrote:
True. But if they are not planned to be fixed at all, then they should
be closed.
You risk to get less bug reports in the collector...
Filing a (good) bug report takes quite a bit of time.
When you have gotten rejections for several bug reports
(that took you quite
Lennart Regebro wrote at 2004-4-30 22:21 +0200:
>Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> Casey Duncan wrote at 2004-4-29 22:19 -0400:
>>
>>>I'm happy to report a successful bug day with a final tally of almost 40
>>>issues closed. The specific issues we squashed were:
>>>
>>>#28,#181,#321,#340,#349,#439,#444,#495
--On Samstag, 1. Mai 2004 13:13 Uhr +0100 Chris Withers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
There are many bugs with ambigous descriptions, or posted anonymously,
or things that are rather like support questions than bugs. If I see
them I close them. Hard and brutal. :)
I agree mo
Lennart Regebro wrote:
There are many bugs with ambigous descriptions, or posted anonymously,
or things that are rather like support questions than bugs. If I see
them I close them. Hard and brutal. :)
This worries me. I think we need a better documented set of circumstances that
are used for re
Casey Duncan wrote:
This means it is an unsponsored bug. It should not remain open forever.
Urm, I don't really think this logic is sound ;-)
The bug collector is not a substitute for documentation and issues that
will never be resolved should be closed. Otherwise it wastes the time of
volunteer b
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Casey Duncan wrote at 2004-4-29 22:19 -0400:
I'm happy to report a successful bug day with a final tally of almost 40
issues closed. The specific issues we squashed were:
#28,#181,#321,#340,#349,#439,#444,#495,#511,#532,#540,#543,
#544,#545,#546,#553,#562,#574,#584,#602,#637,#
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 20:14:30 +0200
Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Casey Duncan wrote at 2004-4-29 22:19 -0400:
> >I'm happy to report a successful bug day with a final tally of almost
> >40 issues closed. The specific issues we squashed were:
> >
> >#28,#181,#321,#340,#349,#439,#444,#4
Casey Duncan wrote at 2004-4-29 22:19 -0400:
>I'm happy to report a successful bug day with a final tally of almost 40
>issues closed. The specific issues we squashed were:
>
>#28,#181,#321,#340,#349,#439,#444,#495,#511,#532,#540,#543,
>#544,#545,#546,#553,#562,#574,#584,#602,#637,#644,#654,#658,#6
16 matches
Mail list logo
