Ken Manheimer wrote:
How is that better than what i implemented, "Refuse"? (Or maybe you
missed that, since it's not in the excerpt context?) As the discussion
has proceeded i'm becoming more convinced that "refuse" is fine...
...and I'm more convinced that "wont fix" is better. This is what So
Ken Manheimer wrote:
All the actions are verbs, "won't fix" is not a verb.
Do we have to be this pedantic?
"Wont' fix" says what it does, it's close enough to verb usage for me:
"I won't fix that"
verb the more clearly indicates the result is "won't fix"? (While the
distinction between "refuse
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> Or maybe "Deny" as a action? Sounds less angry than "reject" and "refuse".
What's being denied - the request to fix the bug, or the validity of the
bug report? "Refuse" suggests only that we are refusing to fix the bug,
there's no implication that the
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 11:56, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > From: "Ken Manheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > All the actions are verbs, "won't fix" is not a verb. Can you suggest a
> > > verb the more clearly indicates the result is "won't fix"?
>
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> From: "Ken Manheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > All the actions are verbs, "won't fix" is not a verb. Can you suggest a
> > verb the more clearly indicates the result is "won't fix"?
>
> Tough one...
>
> "Live with"
> "Ignore"
> "Keep this bug as is"
[Ken Manheimer]
> All the actions are verbs, "won't fix" is not a verb. Can you
> suggest a verb the more clearly indicates the result is "won't
> fix"?
Sorry, I got lost on the first sentence: what difference does it make to
anything whether they're verbs, adjectives, a mix, ...? They're all j
Ken Manheimer wrote:
>
> All the actions are verbs, "won't fix" is not a verb.
How about 'bikeshed'
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
Or maybe "Deny" as a action? Sounds less angry than "reject" and "refuse".
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailma
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 04:56:42PM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> "Featurize" (as in "This is not a bug, it's a feature")
That's my favorite bug-closing technique!
"Closed" works pretty well for that one, though in order
to really justify it I feel compelled to add comments,
docstrings, and/or he
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 11:56, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> From: "Ken Manheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > All the actions are verbs, "won't fix" is not a verb. Can you suggest a
> > verb the more clearly indicates the result is "won't fix"?
>
> Tough one...
>
> "Live with"
> "Ignore"
> "Keep this bu
From: "Ken Manheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> All the actions are verbs, "won't fix" is not a verb. Can you suggest a
> verb the more clearly indicates the result is "won't fix"?
Tough one...
"Live with"
"Ignore"
"Keep this bug as is"
"Zenify"
"Featurize" (as in "This is not a bug, it's a featur
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Andreas Jung wrote:
> --On Donnerstag, 6. Mai 2004 12:37 Uhr +0100 Chris Withers
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ken Manheimer wrote:
> >
> >> Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually
> >> states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a "Won
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Chris Withers wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>
> > Yay! Does this mean we have a fully functional "wont fix" state now?
>
> It does appear to, woohoo!
>
> Can we change the action name from "Refuse" to "Won't Fix"? I took a while to
> find it...
All the actions are verbs, "
Thanks for this Ken!
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 07:57, Chris Withers wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>
> > Ken Manheimer wrote:
> >
> >> Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually
> >> states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a "Wontfix" state and
> >> a "refuse" tr
--On Donnerstag, 6. Mai 2004 12:37 Uhr +0100 Chris Withers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ken Manheimer wrote:
Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually
states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a "Wontfix" state and a
"refuse" transition (bringing to a total of
Chris Withers wrote:
Ken Manheimer wrote:
Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually
states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a "Wontfix" state and
a "refuse" transition (bringing to a total of three the transitions by
which issues are dodged:), and hooked th
Ken Manheimer wrote:
Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually
states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a "Wontfix" state and a
"refuse" transition (bringing to a total of three the transitions by which
issues are dodged:), and hooked them into the existing l
Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think there needs to be another category named "wontfix" that
> doesn't imply that it will ever be fixed like "deferred" seems to.
> This category should also be selected in the default search settings.
Later, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-0
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 13:59, Casey Duncan wrote:
> I volunteer Chris to implement it ;^)
Just tried. I thought it was just a setting in the ZMI, but it's not.
:-( Someone go get Ken!! ;-)
- C
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail
[Chris McDonough]
> I think there needs to be another category named "wontfix" that
> doesn't imply that it will ever be fixed like "deferred" seems to.
> This category should also be selected in the default search settings.
+1. The Python bug tracker has a WontFix, and it's proved valuable in
pr
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 13:43, Casey Duncan wrote:
> In retrospect I probably should have just marked it as deferred rather
> than rejected, the idea was more to provoke action (which I did) then to
> reject it as not-a-bug.
I think there needs to be another category named "wontfix" that doesn't
imp
21 matches
Mail list logo
