Tres Seaver wrote:
Another feature I'm not sure is already in setuptools:
- I *don't* want dev releases to replace production ones
implicitly: no package should be able to install a non-released
version without explicit callout. If this isn't already the
default behavior, then
On Jun 1, 2007, at 7:04 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Any release tagged as alpha, beta, rc, pre, or with an
SVN revision.
I agree with Tres' goal. I think setuptools refers to those as
pre-release tags. And I think anything that has a pre-release tag
should be considered
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2007-5-31 22:04 +0200:
...
How about
foo 2.=5
This seems really weird to me.
I much prefer: foo 2, =2.5
Would you be able to write
foo 2.4, =2.4.3
Yup.
Hmm, ok, then I'm at least not against it. But I still think my
variant is shorter and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on
major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the
following occurred to me:
- Suppose that we always had access to the latest released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On May 31, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
I'd rather have the dot, e.g. foo 2.* = 2.5, just for clarity:
- It makes the intent clearer (that you want any version in the
two dot release line).
- It disambiguates
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 11:14 -0400 schrieb Tres Seaver:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
What do you mean by a dev release?
Any release tagged as alpha, beta, rc, pre, or with an SVN revision.
I agree with Tres' goal. I think setuptools refers to
On May 31, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On May 31, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
I'd rather have the dot, e.g. foo 2.* = 2.5, just for clarity:
- It makes the intent clearer (that you want any version in the
On May 31, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 11:14 -0400 schrieb Tres Seaver:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
What do you mean by a dev release?
Any release tagged as alpha, beta, rc, pre, or with an SVN
revision.
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 11:28 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On May 31, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 11:14 -0400 schrieb Tres Seaver:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
What do you mean by a dev release?
Jim Fulton wrote:
Combined with the fact that that great majority of packages don't change
very much after they have become stable, I think most package
dependencies could be expressed very simply if there was a simple syntax
to specify *just* the major version. In the context of setuptools,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Combined with the fact that that great majority of packages don't
change very much after they have become stable, I think most package
dependencies could be expressed very simply if there was a simple
syntax to specify *just* the major
On May 31, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Combined with the fact that that great majority of packages don't
change very much after they have become stable, I think most
package dependencies could be expressed very simply if there was a
simple syntax
On May 31, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Combined with the fact that that great majority of packages don't
change very much after they have become stable, I think most
package dependencies could be expressed very
On May 31, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 31 May 2007, at 21:50 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On May 31, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Combined with the fact that that great majority of packages
don't change very much after they have
On 31 May 2007, at 22:00 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On May 31, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 31 May 2007, at 21:50 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On May 31, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Combined with the fact that that great majority of
15 matches
Mail list logo
