Roger Ineichen napisał(a):
Renaming doesn't make sense to me since in every book and
documentation ISite is used. I'm against every beautification
which has no benefit.
IPossibleSite -- ISite makes perfect sense to me.
IPossibleSite -- IComponentSite doesnt make sense to me.
and
Thomas Lotze wrote:
Log message for revision 79117:
- moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to zope.location
This is an interesting move. I can settle with the idea, but I wonder
this was discussed... Last time I remember we were discussing the idea
of a package a la
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 09:37, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Thomas Lotze wrote:
Log message for revision 79117:
- moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to
zope.location
This is an interesting move. I can settle with the idea, but I wonder
this was discussed...
On 8/22/07, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this was discussed... Last time I remember we were discussing the idea
of a package a la zope.site or zope.componentsite...
I certainly find zope.componentsite better, because the name actually
explains what it's about.
(Also, as
On 22 Aug 2007, at 15:52 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 09:37, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Thomas Lotze wrote:
Log message for revision 79117:
- moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to
zope.location
This is an interesting move. I can settle with
Hi
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Philipp von Weitershausen
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. August 2007 15:37
An: Thomas Lotze
[...]
This is an interesting move. I can settle with the idea, but
I wonder this was discussed...
