[Zope3-dev] unittest failure in svn trunk

2005-08-04 Thread Wichert Akkerman
I just noticed a unittest error on the current svn trunk: Failure in test testRunIgnoresParentSignals (zdaemon.tests.testzdrun.ZDaemonTests) Traceback (most recent call last): File /local/sources/svn/zope/Zope3/src/zdaemon/tests/testzdrun.py, line 237, in testRunIgnoresParentSignals

Re: [Zope3-dev] PAU trouble

2005-08-04 Thread Dominik Huber
Velko Ivanov wrote: Dominik Huber wrote: Provide ILocation by those adapters, use the 'locatalbe' attribute of the adapter directive (- location proxied) or set the permission explicitly to zope.Public. Thanks for the reply PsycopgAdapter inherits ZopeDatabaseAdapter, which provides

Re: [Zope3-dev] unittest failure in svn trunk

2005-08-04 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 04 August 2005 04:24, Wichert Akkerman wrote: Failure in test testRunIgnoresParentSignals (zdaemon.tests.testzdrun.ZDaemonTests) Traceback (most recent call last):   File /local/sources/svn/zope/Zope3/src/zdaemon/tests/testzdrun.py, line 237, in testRunIgnoresParentSignals

Re: [Zope3-dev] unittest failure in svn trunk

2005-08-04 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Stephan Richter wrote: I always ignore this one ;-) If it is something to be ignored shouldn't be disabled? Having a known failure in the unittests is kind of bad. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3.1.0c1

2005-08-04 Thread Tim Peters
[Antonio Beamud Montero] I have downloaded and when I've make a check: . Failure in test testUmask (zdaemon.tests.testzdrun.ZDaemonTests) Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/antonio/src/noarch/zope/Zope-3.1.0c1/build/lib.linux-i686-2.3/zdaemon/tests/testzdrun.py, line 260,

[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.1.0c1

2005-08-04 Thread Derrick Hudson
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:09:14PM +0200, Antonio Beamud Montero wrote: | I have downloaded and when I've make a check: | . | Failure in test testUmask (zdaemon.tests.testzdrun.ZDaemonTests) | Traceback (most recent call last): | File |

Re: [Zope3-dev] unittest failure in svn trunk

2005-08-04 Thread Julien Anguenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Stephan Richter wrote: I always ignore this one ;-) If it is something to be ignored shouldn't be disabled? Having a known failure in the unittests is kind of bad. Wichert. I doesn't fail for me on a

Re: [Zope3-dev] unittest failure in svn trunk

2005-08-04 Thread Tim Peters
[Wichert Akkerman] | I just noticed a unittest error on the current svn trunk: Failure in test testRunIgnoresParentSignals (zdaemon.tests.testzdrun.ZDaemonTests) Traceback (most recent call last): File /local/sources/svn/zope/Zope3/src/zdaemon/tests/testzdrun.py, line 237, in

Re: [Zope3-dev] unittest failure in svn trunk

2005-08-04 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 04 August 2005 09:52, Julien Anguenot wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Stephan Richter wrote: I always ignore this one ;-) If it is something to be ignored shouldn't be disabled? Having a known failure in the unittests is kind of bad. Wichert. I doesn't fail

Re: [Zope3-dev] unittest failure in svn trunk

2005-08-04 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Tim Peters wrote: See above. Does it fail often for you (or for Stephan)? If so, someone on a platform where it fails needs to investigate why. It certainly isn't failing for everyone. If failed 2 out of 2 tries on my laptop which uses python 2.3.5. I succeeded on a desktop

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.1.0c1

2005-08-04 Thread Albertas Agejevas
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:50:11AM -0400, Derrick Hudson wrote: On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:09:14PM +0200, Antonio Beamud Montero wrote: | I have downloaded and when I've make a check: | . | Failure in test testUmask (zdaemon.tests.testzdrun.ZDaemonTests) | Traceback (most recent call

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3.1.0c1

2005-08-04 Thread Antonio Beamud Montero
El jue, 04-08-2005 a las 09:50 -0400, Tim Peters escribió: [Antonio Beamud Montero] I have downloaded and when I've make a check: . Failure in test testUmask (zdaemon.tests.testzdrun.ZDaemonTests) Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: [Zope3-dev] unittest failure in svn trunk

2005-08-04 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 04 August 2005 11:24, Tim Peters wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zope3]$ uname -a Linux ds9 2.4.22-1.2199.nptlsmp #1 SMP Wed Aug 4 11:48:29 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zope3]$ python test.py -vvuL --all . Ignores ... and it passed 400 times in a row (at which

[Zope3-dev] [Fwd: Zope3.1 -- Z3/ECM status and future]

2005-08-04 Thread Julien Anguenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I guess It could interest some people on this list as well. J. - -- Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo RD (Paris, France) CPS Platform : http://www.cps-project.org Zope3 / ECM : http://www.z3lab.org mail: anguenot at nuxeo.com; tel: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57

[Zope3-dev] Zope3 / lxml proposal

2005-08-04 Thread Julien Anguenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FYI, I posted a Zope3 proposal dealing with lxml dependency there. lxml supporters it's over there : http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/LxmlDependency :) J. - -- Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo RD (Paris,

[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.1.0c1

2005-08-04 Thread Derrick Hudson
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:29:00PM +0300, Albertas Agejevas wrote: | On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:50:11AM -0400, Derrick Hudson wrote: | On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:09:14PM +0200, Antonio Beamud Montero wrote: | | I have downloaded and when I've make a check: | | . | | Failure in test

[Zope3-dev] New Proposals Online

2005-08-04 Thread Stephan Richter
Hi everyone, I just posted two developer documentation related proposals: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/DeveloperMode http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/IntrospectorNG Please feel free to comment, question and critique. Regards,

Re: [Zope3-dev] uniformly configurable request factories: bugfix or proposal?

2005-08-04 Thread Gary Poster
On Aug 4, 2005, at 11:17 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: On Thursday 04 August 2005 22:40, Gary Poster wrote: When trying to determine a plug point for some functionality we were contemplating, Fred Drake and I were surprised to see that