Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reducing the amount of ZCML directives

2006-02-14 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 2/14/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > component=".alias.sydneyFactory" > name="alias.SydneyBristow" > /> > > The naming of the component already gives it away as a factory. To me that's > enough naming. I think I agree. This to me makes sense. If i

Re: [Zope3-dev] zcml in config db?

2006-02-14 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 2/14/06, Shaun Cutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The biggest reason: I can imagine that when deploying a package, various > configurations, for instance security, but also adding internationalization, > have to be adapted for the specific site. This way, they could be deployed > without access/

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 web root

2006-02-14 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:17:04AM +0100, Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote: | Shaun Cutts said the following on 2006-02-14 07:37: | I have seriously considered trying out Django and similar tools to see | if they would fit better with the kind of applications I need to do, but | I really like the power t

[Zope3-dev] Re: One namespace for ZCML

2006-02-14 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Just note that I'm explicitly not addressing automation as a use case for > custom ZCML directives. I believe automation is best done in Python. If you're > trying to invent a new ZCML directive that does something

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 web root

2006-02-14 Thread Dario Lopez-Kästen
Sidnei da Silva said the following on 2006-02-14 12:15: On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:17:04AM +0100, Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote: | Shaun Cutts said the following on 2006-02-14 07:37: | I have seriously considered trying out Django and similar tools to see | if they would fit better with the kind of a

[Zope3-dev] Re: One namespace for ZCML

2006-02-14 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: >> I suspect quite >> a few of the directives that can go away are in the 'small' namespaces, >> such as mail. We may also want to move some directives to other >> namespaces. If all directiv

Re: [Zope3-dev] Pluggins vs Application Definition

2006-02-14 Thread Rocky Burt
Stephan Richter wrote: > On Saturday 11 February 2006 16:50, Jim Fulton wrote: > >>- Application developers need to build an application. They will >> generally want fairly tight control over what goes into the >> application. For them, it's valuable to say in an explicit >> way what they

[Zope3-dev] Re: RFC: Reducing the amount of ZCML directives

2006-02-14 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lennart Regebro wrote: > On 2/14/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > component=".alias.sydneyFactory" >> name="alias.SydneyBristow" >> /> >> >>The naming of the component already gives it away as a factory.

[Zope3-dev] Future of zope.app

2006-02-14 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Hi everyone, Jim said that he wants zope.app to become smaller. I would welcome that. Is it time for this to be thought about? For various reasons, mostly personal ones, I would consider Zope 3.3/2.10 a good point for this to be done. If others agree, we should get started, especially since we mo

[Zope3-dev] Re: One namespace for ZCML

2006-02-14 Thread Florent Guillaume
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Yet again looking for comments, this time at: http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/OneNamespaceForZCML. Let me add my -1 to this. I'm all for reducing the number of namespaces in the standard directives, and reducing the number of directives too, but getting rid of names

Re: [Zope3-dev] Future of zope.app

2006-02-14 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 08:41, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Jim said that he wants zope.app to become smaller. I would welcome that. > Is it time for this to be thought about? > > For various reasons, mostly personal ones, I would consider Zope > 3.3/2.10 a good point for this to be done.

Re: [Zope3-dev] Future of zope.app

2006-02-14 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Stephan Richter wrote: >>Jim said that he wants zope.app to become smaller. I would welcome that. >>Is it time for this to be thought about? >> >>For various reasons, mostly personal ones, I would consider Zope >>3.3/2.10 a good point for this to be done. If others agree, we should >>get started, e

[Zope3-dev] Re: One namespace for ZCML

2006-02-14 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Tres Seaver wrote: >>>Just note that I'm explicitly not addressing automation as a use case for >>>custom ZCML directives. I believe automation is best done in Python. If >>>you're >>>trying to invent a new ZCML directive that does something else to an >>>adapter/view/utility before registering it

Re: [Zope3-dev] Pluggins vs Application Definition

2006-02-14 Thread Benji York
Rocky Burt wrote: Zope 2 developers see zcml slugs and say, "what, things have gotten harder going to zope3?". This isn't a contradiction of what Rocky Burt said, but I feel the need to assert that "harder" doesn't necessarily mean "worse". It's also not necessarily "better" either. Now ba

[Zope3-dev] Re: Indirection Reporter

2006-02-14 Thread Derrick Hudson
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:18:24AM -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote: | I want a way to inspect all of the indirections chosen in the course of | a web request or any other publishing operation. After executing a web | request, Zope will report all of the points where it made a decision | using the

Re: [Zope3-dev] One namespace for ZCML

2006-02-14 Thread Jeff Shell
On 2/13/06, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 13 February 2006 07:57, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > Yet again looking for comments, this time at: > > http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/OneNamespaceForZCML. > > -1 > > Here some comments: > > - You do not argue how the decision-mak

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 web root

2006-02-14 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:36 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:51:34 -, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Scripts and RBDMS are the fast food of the web development world, not the salad. Looks nice, tastes great, eventually leaves you fat and unhealthy. ZODB and mayb

[Zope3-dev] Indirection Reporter

2006-02-14 Thread Kent Tenney
> The report will consist of lines that look something like this, but more > graphical: ... > The point is to make most indirection transparent to both beginners and > experts. ... > Thoughts? As one who lurks, wishing he was smart enough to understand Zope3, this is exciting. As I gaze up at the

[Zope3-dev] Re: Future of zope.app

2006-02-14 Thread Mikhail Kashkin
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > I also think that the release system we have chosen shouldn't stand in > the way of agile refactorings. If the last release contained only 10 new > features, I have no problem when the next one contains 100 or 1000, > given it's all properly documented and BBB is

correction (Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 web root)

2006-02-14 Thread Dario Lopez-Kästen
Dario Lopez-Kästen said the following on 2006-02-14 08:17: If the tools and feature that Zope provide become easier to integrate in an non-Zope envireonment, I think that Zope will eventually come out as the tool of choice for any projects that needs to do more than "setup a simple website", w

Re: [Zope3-dev] One namespace for ZCML

2006-02-14 Thread Lennart Regebro
OK, after following the diskussion I'm now -1. Lets first go through Phillips other ZCML simplification, then look at what we can do for browser:*, and then see if what's left should have several namespaces or not. I think that people who can't be bohered to copy/paste a set of names-space definit