Re: AW: [Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: zope.location/trunk/s - moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to zope.location
Roger Ineichen napisał(a): Renaming doesn't make sense to me since in every book and documentation ISite is used. I'm against every beautification which has no benefit. IPossibleSite -- ISite makes perfect sense to me. IPossibleSite -- IComponentSite doesnt make sense to me. and IPossibleComponentSite -- IComponentSite is worth to comment on. Regards Roger Ineichen Yes, ISite is already used as a well-known term for Zopers (is short and 'handy'), but in general I just don't like the name Site/ISite. It does not corresponds to the meaning that most of the people from 'outside' of 'Zope world' have, and it was confusing me at the begining of my history with Zope. Even now sometimes looking for a help on Web (googling ;)) is a little pain, couse very specific (narrow) key words used for finding a solution gives no results, and at the same time not using some of them leads to hunderds/thousands of pages with information of 'sites' in the meaning of portal/web_apps or others. Personally I don't like ComponentSite as well (and probably won't like anything with the word 'site' inside ;))) Component- or Local- Registry will be much more appreciated to me, but I don't want to vote right now for any of them. I just think that some other name(s) (than 'Site') should be invited/proposed, discussed and than used (I vote for that!), even for the sake of 'breaking relations' to previous name (by 'previous' I mean current term 'Site') that could be met in books/docs. -- Ramok ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: zope.location/trunk/s - moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to zope.location
Thomas Lotze wrote: Log message for revision 79117: - moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to zope.location This is an interesting move. I can settle with the idea, but I wonder this was discussed... Last time I remember we were discussing the idea of a package a la zope.site or zope.componentsite... (Also, as long as we're moving things, I wouldn't mind renaming ISite to IComponentSite). -- http://worldcookery.com -- Professional Zope documentation and training ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: zope.location/trunk/s - moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to zope.location
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 09:37, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: Log message for revision 79117: - moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to zope.location This is an interesting move. I can settle with the idea, but I wonder this was discussed... There was an E-mail pointing this out. I remember giving +1. Last time I remember we were discussing the idea of a package a la zope.site or zope.componentsite... (Also, as long as we're moving things, I wouldn't mind renaming ISite to IComponentSite). -1 on IComponentSite Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: zope.location/trunk/s - moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to zope.location
On 8/22/07, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this was discussed... Last time I remember we were discussing the idea of a package a la zope.site or zope.componentsite... I certainly find zope.componentsite better, because the name actually explains what it's about. (Also, as long as we're moving things, I wouldn't mind renaming ISite to IComponentSite). +1 -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr.fdrake at gmail.com Chaos is the score upon which reality is written. --Henry Miller ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: zope.location/trunk/s - moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to zope.location
On 22 Aug 2007, at 15:52 , Stephan Richter wrote: On Wednesday 22 August 2007 09:37, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: Log message for revision 79117: - moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to zope.location This is an interesting move. I can settle with the idea, but I wonder this was discussed... There was an E-mail pointing this out. I remember giving +1. Yup, found it [1]. Last time I remember we were discussing the idea of a package a la zope.site or zope.componentsite... (Also, as long as we're moving things, I wouldn't mind renaming ISite to IComponentSite). -1 on IComponentSite Do you have any reasons other than that ISite is a widely understood term in Zope 3 now and everyone knows about it [2] (which I personally think is naive thinking, given that we'd like to make terminology as easy as possible for newbiews and my experience says that ISite is anything but intuitive). [1] http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2007-August/023210.html [2] http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2007-August/023189.html ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
AW: [Zope3-dev] Re: SVN: zope.location/trunk/s - moved IPossibleSite and ISite from zope.app.component to zope.location
Hi -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Philipp von Weitershausen Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. August 2007 15:37 An: Thomas Lotze [...] This is an interesting move. I can settle with the idea, but I wonder this was discussed... Last time I remember we were discussing the idea of a package a la zope.site or zope.componentsite... (Also, as long as we're moving things, I wouldn't mind renaming ISite to IComponentSite). -1 Renaming doesn't make sense to me since in every book and documentation ISite is used. I'm against every beautification which has no benefit. IPossibleSite -- ISite makes perfect sense to me. IPossibleSite -- IComponentSite doesnt make sense to me. and IPossibleComponentSite -- IComponentSite is worth to comment on. Regards Roger Ineichen _ END OF MESSAGE -- http://worldcookery.com -- Professional Zope documentation and training ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/dev%40projekt01.ch ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
