Dieter Maurer wrote:
The "str" example shows also that it is not sensible
that the adapter registry framework gives the adapter (factory)
a way to determine its name ("str" has nothing where the "name"
could be sticked in).
True enough, I guess I'll just have to stick with my hack or Tres'
cur
Chris Withers wrote at 2006-11-28 18:09 +:
>Benji York wrote:
>> Chris Withers wrote:
>>> I don't think it'll be a common pattern, but it doesn't feel right to
>>> me that a named adapter (ie: one registered with a specific name) has
>>> no way of finding out what name it has been registered
Previously Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 November 2006 03:37, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > The fact that something is true in Zope 3 does not necessarily make it a
> > good idea.
>
> But the chances are pretty high! ;-)
Of course I meant to say 'Zope 2' there, which does reduce the chan
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 03:37, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> The fact that something is true in Zope 3 does not necessarily make it a
> good idea.
But the chances are pretty high! ;-)
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web
Previously Chris Withers wrote:
> Really? Certainly in Zope 2, prettymuch every persistent objects needs
> to be getId()'able...
The fact that something is true in Zope 3 does not necessarily make it a
good idea.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things.
Benji York wrote:
Really? Now this is a use case I hadn't thought of.. can you give me
some examples of where you've run into this?
I don't know that I have, but the component system doesn't preclude it
so anything we come up with will have to take it into effect.
I'll whisper yagni at this
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 06:12:19PM +, Chris Withers wrote:
> Is there a python-only way to register adapters instead of in ZCML and,
> if it exists, is it safe to use in conjunction with the normal zcml dances?
There's always a way :)
You could just do what the directive does - call the adapt
Chris Withers wrote:
Benji York wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
I don't think it'll be a common pattern, but it doesn't feel right to
me that a named adapter (ie: one registered with a specific name) has
no way of finding out what name it has been registered with...
Because the same adapter can be
Benji York wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
I don't think it'll be a common pattern, but it doesn't feel right to
me that a named adapter (ie: one registered with a specific name) has
no way of finding out what name it has been registered with...
Because the same adapter can be registered more tha
On Monday 27 November 2006 11:17, Benji York wrote:
> This seems somewhat analogous to a Python object being given multiple
> names. In that case too, there is no way for the object to know what
> it's names are.
Great analogy. I used that one before too, but did not think of it this time.
Regar
Chris Withers wrote:
I don't think it'll be a common pattern, but it doesn't feel right to me
that a named adapter (ie: one registered with a specific name) has no
way of finding out what name it has been registered with...
Because the same adapter can be registered more than once, it would
a
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 17 November 2006 03:43, Chris Withers wrote:
What do you suggest I do when the adapter needs to know the name it was
registered for?
You can make the name part of the adapter API.
Not sure what you mean by this?
However, I would suggest revising the design;
On Friday 17 November 2006 03:43, Chris Withers wrote:
> What do you suggest I do when the adapter needs to know the name it was
> registered for?
You can make the name part of the adapter API.
However, I would suggest revising the design; I have never come across a
scenario where I wanted the n
Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Can a named adapter find out the name it was registered with during
the adaptation process?
Nope.
I can see why it's that way, but it seems a shame and maybe even an
oversight :-/
What do you suggest I do when the
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Can a named adapter find out the name it was registered with during
the adaptation process?
Nope.
I can see why it's that way, but it seems a shame and maybe even an
oversight :-/
What do you suggest I do when the adapter needs to know
15 matches
Mail list logo
