Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 13. November 2005 11:25:21 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/collector_contents?searching=yep&Sear
chableText=&status%3Alist%3Aignore_empty=Accepted&status%3Alist%3Aignore_
empty=Pending&classifications%3Alist%3Aigno
--On 13. November 2005 11:25:21 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/collector_contents?searching=yep&Sear
chableText=&status%3Alist%3Aignore_empty=Accepted&status%3Alist%3Aignore_
empty=Pending&classifications%3Alist%3Aignore_empty=bug&importan
[Andreas Jung]
> ...
> There are no 2.9 related issues in the collector but I assume there a bunch
> of unreported issues.
That the Zope trunk tests fail on Windows should be a 2.9 release issue, yes?
Windows test failures on Zope trunk
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1931
___
Andreas Jung wrote:
I can only what I know of. If there are bugs then they should be documented
in the collector.
Of course.
...
We currently have 9
critical Zope 2 bugs.
Where are they documented? They should be documented in the collector or
least there should be some communication
--On 13. November 2005 10:55:19 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you also track bugs?
I can only what I know of. If there are bugs then they should be documented
in the collector.
I'm not sure how, aside from feature
completeness, we
decide we're ready for a beta. For Zope 3
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 12. November 2005 22:08:38 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
FYI (this is mostly for the benefit of the Five folks), I've created a
Zope 2.9 branch from the trunk as of about 10 minutes ago. This branch
is frozen for feature work; it may need some ch
--On 12. November 2005 22:08:38 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
FYI (this is mostly for the benefit of the Five folks), I've created a
Zope 2.9 branch from the trunk as of about 10 minutes ago. This branch
is frozen for feature work; it may need some changing of externals t
