Igor Stroh wrote:
> Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:15:42PM +0100, Florian Lindner wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I also think that pure Latex would be the best choice. It's convertible into
>>>a
>>>lot different formats and can be edited just using a simple text editor.
>>
>>
>>Isn't
On 2/15/06, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So with that in mind, if you do not know how to do professional desktop
> publishing, then LaTeX is a much better options, since it results look really
> professional.
We also have lots of cool support for Python documentation in LaTeX,
whic
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 03:38, Chris Withers wrote:
> I find it ironic the one of the first uses of PCs was to do word
> processing, and yet we seem to always strive to edit plain text of one
> variety or another, and yes, that includes latex ;-)
That's because Word Processors just do not ha
Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:15:42PM +0100, Florian Lindner wrote:
I also think that pure Latex would be the best choice. It's convertible into a
lot different formats and can be edited just using a simple text editor.
Isn't Docbook a better choice? Is is specially des
Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:15:42PM +0100, Florian Lindner wrote:
>
>>I also think that pure Latex would be the best choice. It's convertible into
>>a
>>lot different formats and can be edited just using a simple text editor.
>
>
> Isn't Docbook a better choice? Is
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:15:42PM +0100, Florian Lindner wrote:
>
> I also think that pure Latex would be the best choice. It's convertible into
> a
> lot different formats and can be edited just using a simple text editor.
Isn't Docbook a better choice? Is is specially designed for documents
Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2006 19:41 schrieb Paul Dumais:
> Thanks, everyone for your comments. I'm not sure how commited I am to
> doing this, but I might as well take the rock soup approach. A rock
> soup is better than no soup, and everyone else can add their favorite
> ingredients to make it int
Thanks, everyone for your comments. I'm not sure how commited I am to
doing this, but I might as well take the rock soup approach. A rock
soup is better than no soup, and everyone else can add their favorite
ingredients to make it into something tasty.
I like the latex approch. There is a latex to
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 12:15, Paul Dumais wrote:
> Do we start from scratch?
I think you have to, because both current books have licenses that do not
allow any other commercial use.
> Can we use any of the material from Stephan
> or Phillip's books? The Zope 3 Developer's Handbook by Step
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:15:50 -0700
Paul Dumais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Do we start from scratch? Can we use any of the material from
Stephan
or Phillip's books? The Zope 3 Developer's Handbook by Stephan
Richter
doesn't seem to have any copywrite notice on it (on line pdf ver
Hi everyone,
I would like to see a Zope 3 Developer's LiveBook. I know this has
been mentioned in the past, but I think it really makes sense because
Zope3 is changing so quickly and there are alot of great solutions to
problems coming all the time.
Do we start from scratch? Can we use any of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
