er or worse. =)
I believe this comes from some example I found via zope.org but could be
wrong.
Best,
jim
--
Jim Hebert http://www.cosource.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The cooperative market for open source software
"Well actually I was considering
27;s what I've been known to
do, if I correctly understand your goal...)
jim
--
Jim Hebert http://www.cosource.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The cooperative market for open source software
"Well actually I was considering opening a market in fly
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Hamish Lawson wrote:
> Jim Hebert wrote:
>
> > Is there a reason you can't do this by just messing with the
> > namespaces stack, ie, adding additional folders to it?
>
> I had been latterly thinking this myself and set about trying to d
e simply the coolest damn thing I have ever worked on,
bar none. I would love to bump into Jim Fulton at a show sometime, because
I think I like the way his mind works!! =)
jim
hoping to git educated. =)
--
Jim Hebert http://www.cosource.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED
double-dtml-with in one place, the toplevel
index_html.
So, it may not be ideal for other design patterns.
jim
--
Jim Hebert http://www.cosource.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The cooperative market for open source software
"Well actually I was considerin
on the list are profiting from this exchange
as much as I am!
jim
--
Jim Hebert http://www.cosource.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The cooperative market for open source software
"Well actually I was considering opening a market in flying pigs. M
;d be nice to have a solution requiring javascript, but
I bet you that the people dumb enough to double click the submit button
are the people with javascript on... =)
jim
--
Jim Hebert http://www.cosource.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The cooperative marke
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Nils Kassube wrote:
> The problem is not that a client who paid for custom development
> will get the source. It's the fact that you have to release the
> source code of an enhanced GPL'ed component (and possibly stuff
> built with it) for everyone else, too.
*gasp* Your cl
ant out there
can pick and choose among the code available and if they want to shun
GPL'd modules, great. That's a far better way to go then telling people
not to write them in the first place, thank you very much.
jim
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Nils Kassube wrote:
> Jim Hebert wrote:
>
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Nils Kassube wrote:
> To quote Dave Winer: "[The GPL is] designed to create a wall between
> commercial development and free development. The world is not that
> simple. There are plenty of commercial developers who participate in
> open source. Python belongs in commercial p
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Nils Kassube wrote:
> I'm only pointing out what I think is a problem with using a
> GPL'ed component in a Zope site.
> My Zope-specific problem is: If I use a GPL'ed component in a complex
> object oriented environment like Zope, does this mean that the whole
> work is now
You could check into the ExtFile product (search on zope.org) and see if
that makes a perf difference.
That said, just about anything on that setup is going to be slow!!
Please excuse the os advocacy, but given that this is likely all you'd
dream of running on this server anyways (ie it's not lik
OK, this works:
My DTML Method, "y":
foo
If I change z to read as follows, it breaks:
foo
where y is a DTML Method simply containing
The error I get is:
Error Type: AttributeError
Error Value: __getitem__
...
Traceback (innermost last):
File /usr/local/Zope-2.2.4-src/lib/python/
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> I tried to reproduce this in Zope 2.3 CVS.
Sorry, shoulda mentioned, this error came from 2.2.4, and apologies for
not testing against at least 2.2.5 first, I managed to miss its release
entirely... (I still haven't gotten around to installing it so I
14 matches
Mail list logo
