Hi Nick,
Nick Davis wrote:
BTW Both Chris and I come from the UK where complaining about things
is a national sport so please no-one take offence. ;-)
Nah, the Plone stuff is beyond mere national past time. The excruciating
agony it's caused me on a fairly regular basis for a number of year
Rob, Tres,
Thanks a lot for your helpful responses. I take Tres's point of the
difficulty of making templates that work for the different interests of
designers and programmers, and that migration headaches are often a
consequence of this. Hadn't thought of it like that before.
Also its goo
Nick Davis wrote:
Hello
Some thoughts :
- Upgrading to Zope 2.8 without reading the release notes.
I followed the release notes but this didn't fix catalog errors. I am
not the only one. This is apparently fixed in Zope 2.8.2 but that
doesn't look like it can be downloaded yet.
in some ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Davis wrote:
>>> - Third party products that are not yet fully compatible
>>> with Plone 2.1 and/or Zope 2.8.
>
> Should this perhaps be the other way around? If those products used the
> APIs correctly, perhaps a new release of Zope/Plone s
Hello
Some thoughts :
- Upgrading to Zope 2.8 without reading the release notes.
I followed the release notes but this didn't fix catalog errors. I am
not the only one. This is apparently fixed in Zope 2.8.2 but that
doesn't look like it can be downloaded yet.
- Third party products that ar
Rob Miller wrote:
this strikes me as a bit unfair. to quote stefan holek from a post on
plone-dev earlier today, most reported migration problems are due to:
- Upgrading to Zope 2.8 without reading the release notes.
*shrugs* I've not had need to read he release notes yet, what am I missing?
Chris Withers wrote:
Nick Davis wrote:
there seem to still be migration problems and broken products which
prevent people going to 2.1 yet.
Yup.
this strikes me as a bit unfair. to quote stefan holek from a post on
plone-dev earlier today, most reported migration problems are due to:
Hi Nick,
Nick Davis wrote:
I agree that 2+ years should have produced maturity. Zope seems to be
a lot more stable than Plone.
Well, Zope has had about 10 years to stabilise, versus Plone's 2 ;-)
Maybe the reason people focus on your Plone talk is you touch a chord
with people who too
Chris
I agree that 2+ years should have produced maturity. Zope seems to
be a lot more stable than Plone.
Maybe the reason people focus on your Plone talk is you touch a
chord with people who too are wrestling with Plone.
Probably at least once a week the thought crosses our minds of
d
Nick Davis wrote:
Thanks for posting this, Chris. Very interesting. I would've liked to
have been at the conferences where you gave these. ;-)
With bricks or beer? ;-)
I think you make some good points.
thanks!
My main gripe with Plone is its such a moving target. Hopefully as it
matures
Thanks for posting this, Chris. Very interesting. I would've liked to
have been at the conferences where you gave these. ;-)
I think you make some good points.
My main gripe with Plone is its such a moving target. Hopefully as it
matures this will get better.
_
David H wrote:
> I saw that in a few google hits but ... I figured that if a fair
> population wants to view the presentations then the files should be in a
> universal format - like pdf or rtf.
> Its an interesting question: how many people who just wish to peruse
> the files will feel compe
12 matches
Mail list logo
